User talk:Letcreate123

Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #252

Archives (Index)

1 2

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Your GA nomination of Golden age of arcade video games

The article Golden age of arcade video games you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Golden age of arcade video games for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 18:20, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Informing people of TfDs

Hey ToonLucas22. Please see step III at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Listing a template. I just noticed that the discussion of {{Uw-paid1‎}} etc. had been closed at TfD as keep – without ever knowing they were up for deletion. I have over ten thousand pages on my watchlist and unfortunately missed these. I probably should clean that up a bit, but nevertheless, as the creator of the four templates, your first stop after nominating should have been my talk page, to notify me directly. I am annoyed, even after the keep, that I did not get to participate. Following the notification step will also keep people from later using that as a subsequent basis to overturn the discussion. I can tell you that had this resulted in deletion, I would be composing my deletion review nomination right now. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Re: BOI bias

Not at all man. No bias at all. Its just to keep uniformity. Otherwise Kick ww gross acc to koimoi HNY acc to some other shi*** website. How can we compare if we dont use same source? WikiBriefed (talk) 13:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Notice

Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, such as Reactions to the November 2015 Paris attacks, which you have recently edited. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. RGloucester — ☎ 21:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)