Jump to content

User talk:Cassianto: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
SineBot (talk | contribs)
Bots
2,548,809 edits
m Signing comment by 82.152.123.85 - "→‎Piss off?: new section"
Cassianto (talk | contribs)
37,340 edits
Undid revision 711448171 by SineBot (talk) -- please don't make me turn the piss off into a fuck off. I'm a bit bored with ANI now
Line 48: Line 48:
== Piss off? ==
== Piss off? ==


Seems you can tell me to piss off and that's OK but I repeat your comments on your talkpage and it gets reverted. Maybe someone on here can explain this to me and other editors? Also you revert a clear MOS edit and nothing happens to you but I'm reported. I take it in the interest of Wikipedia this section will also be deleted even though it does not break any rules. No wonder the rest of us remain outside the wall xxx <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.152.123.85|82.152.123.85]] ([[User talk:82.152.123.85|talk]]) 23:15, 22 March 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Seems you can tell me to piss off and that's OK but I repeat your comments on your talkpage and it gets reverted. Maybe someone on here can explain this to me and other editors? Also you revert a clear MOS edit and nothing happens to you but I'm reported. I take it in the interest of Wikipedia this section will also be deleted even though it does not break any rules. No wonder the rest of us remain outside the wall xxx

Revision as of 23:18, 22 March 2016

Please leave a message; I'll reply here.

    Congrats!!

    Many many congratulations C for this. Usually the time zone I am in means that I miss all the fun so I am happy to be the first to say Well done. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 23:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    If it wasn't for your help and my excellent colleagues and friends, it wouldn't have been possible. Many thanks CassiantoTalk 23:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    I was glad to help. I will expand my post to include a big thanks to all those that took part. It was great fun to see where the article was when you started the FAC and then watch as everyone's input continued to improve it. Enjoy your Sunday. MarnetteD|Talk 23:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Nicely done. Very well written an enjoyable read. Kafka Liz (talk) 00:43, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Why thank you. Again, I wouldn't have what I have today if it wasn't for the help of others; especially that of a certain little Irishman whose help was very much appreciated. Next, something a bit more grizzly. CassiantoTalk 07:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Oi, less of the little! But yeah very nice work Cassianto, you certainly can write. Looking forward to Burke and Hare. Ceoil (talk) 11:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Burke and Hare, now that's something I could really get my teeth into. Kafka Liz (talk) 12:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry I'm late for the congrats, I hadn't realized it had been promoted! Well done!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    George Bernard Shaw

    Greetings! Can Brian B. and I interest you in the peer review of GBS's article? All comments gratefully received if you have time and inclination. Tim riley talk 15:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dagenham Civic Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

    It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Kalki Koechlin

    Hey, I just re-nominated Kalki Koechlin's article for WP:FA. If you find spare time, would you mind taking a look? Thank you! NumerounovedantTalk 18:10, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Your helpful review

    Precious again, your detailed constructive comments which helped to improve Christ lag in Todes Banden, BWV 4 to FA!

    --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:58, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Social Work

    Reply for "No reason to hide rogue ip's. Or do you you have something to hide?" Meaning http://www.thefreedictionary.com/rogue, better put as independent otherwise its misrepresentation. Above that the word IP-hopper and even adding the IP I used by a certain editor Jim1138 shows rogue nature and it seems to be intended for Wikipedia:Harassment. Moreover that same editor seems to add IP's as it goes under the heading, when IP's are already shown. It would be more accurate if the editors attempts are read along with http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-35787730 If such activities are validated for some certain sakes. This sort of anti-social attempts will continue to mask under policies and so on.59.98.249.148 (talk) 17:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    You cannot harass a group of people. If you decide to counter that by saying that this isn't a group and is in fact you alone, then please bear in mind WP:SOCK. A breach of of this will almost certainly see you blocked. CassiantoTalk 17:24, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Piss off?

    Seems you can tell me to piss off and that's OK but I repeat your comments on your talkpage and it gets reverted. Maybe someone on here can explain this to me and other editors? Also you revert a clear MOS edit and nothing happens to you but I'm reported. I take it in the interest of Wikipedia this section will also be deleted even though it does not break any rules. No wonder the rest of us remain outside the wall xxx

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cassianto&oldid=711448445"