User talk:Chabuk: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
THERE IS NO MAN UGLIER THAN COREY SHEFMAN |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
THERE IS NO MAN UGLIER THAN COREY SHEFMAN |
|||
<div style="background-color: #FF6600; border: 2px solid black; align:center"><font face="arial" size="4" alignment="center"> |
|||
'''<big>My sincere thanks and appreciation goes out to all of the many dedicated wikipedians who have removed defamatory vandalism from my page over the last few days!</big>'''</font><br> |
|||
</div> |
|||
---- |
|||
{| class="infobox" width="270px" |
|||
|- |
|||
!align="center"|[[Image:Vista-file-manager.png|50px|Archive]]<br/>[[Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page|Archives]] |
|||
---- |
|||
|- |
|||
| |
|||
# [[User_talk:Pm shef/Archive 1|31 October 2005 – 7 April 2006]] |
|||
# [[User_talk:Pm shef/Archive 2|8 April 2006 – 5 August 2006]] |
|||
# |
|||
# |
|||
|} |
|||
<!-- Template:Archivebox --> |
|||
<div style="background-color: #EEEEEE; border: 1px solid black; padding-left: 0.5em; padding-right: 0.5em"> |
|||
'''Read BEFORE Posting''': |
|||
* Vandalism and other offensive commentary/trolling will be deleted expeditiously. |
|||
* If you want me to respond/take your comments seriously, sign them with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. I will respond on your talk page, but I will not return to your talk page after that unless you've responded on my talk page. Sounds convoluted, but I'd rather be editing articles than reading your talk page. |
|||
* Add your comments to the '''bottom of the page'''. |
|||
* If you don't agree with a change that I've made to an article, please let me know '''nicely''' and I will address the issue. |
|||
</div> |
|||
==Archive 2== |
|||
*I have just archived my talk page, to see previous discussions, please see [[User:Pm shef/Archive 2|Archive 2]]. -- [[User:Pm shef|pm_shef]] 20:37, 5 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== VaughanWatch etc. == |
|||
Pm_shef, are you going to use [[User:TheM62Manchester/VaughanWatch evidence]] if they do any more |
|||
POV edits?? |
|||
hope this helps... --[[User:TheM62Manchester|TheM62Manchester]] 20:46, 5 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::Sadly, I'm not an admin, but use it anyway and let people on [[WP:ANI]] know about it. --[[User:TheM62Manchester|TheM62Manchester]] 20:50, 5 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*I think that [[User:TheM62Manchester|TheM62Manchester]] wikiloves [[user:pm_shef]] a bit too much. There is already an official checkuser or whatever it is going on. I suggest we post evidence there. [[User:ED209|ED209]] 00:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:*''rolls eyes'' CheckUser all you want bud, the guy has been editing on here since ''before'' I even started, and edits things I don't have the slightest clue about. Keep trying though. -- [[User:Pm shef|pm_shef]] 00:45, 6 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*A little testy today are we. I'm not saying you guys are one of the same. I just highlighted the fact that he gave you wikilove eariler on and that he created a pointless page for you to complain about [[user:VaughanWatch]]. I think you may affliated with those users which had "edge" in there name and always supported you a few months back. However, I don't care about this stuff like you do so I'm not going to complain about it. [[User:ED209|ED209]] 00:50, 6 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Vandals == |
|||
No problem. Trolls like that are just trying to get under you skin; I have had [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Psy_guy&diff=next&oldid=25736214 one] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Psy_guy&diff=next&oldid=27255879 two] or thirty myself. My advise is to take it as a compliment, because you must be doing something right if the vandals take notice of you. See you around. -- [[User:Psy guy|Psy guy]] <sup>[[User_talk:Psy_guy|Talk]]</sup> 22:22, 5 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==VaughanWatch etc== |
|||
I have responded on the SSP page; apologies for the delay. It seems likely that he is a sock, but there is not firm technical evidence, but thereis a little. Do you have any further evidence to suspect this? Thanks and regards, <font color="#007FFF">[[User:Kilo-Lima|Iola]]</font>'''[[User:Kilo-Lima/Esperanza|<font color="#50C878">k</font>]]'''<font color="#007FFF">[[User:Kilo-Lima|ana]]</font>|<sup><font color="orange">[[User talk:Kilo-Lima|T]]</font></sup> 15:32, 6 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Further to Vaughan== |
|||
I assume you've discovered [[User:Pm watch]]. What do you make of this? [[User:CJCurrie|CJCurrie]] 21:27, 6 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*Ah -- never mind, I hadn't seen your last post. [[User:CJCurrie|CJCurrie]] 21:31, 6 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== RE: Israel article == |
|||
Was the edit i added remove because of the wording? Am i allowed to add the info about the Deir Yassin massacre as its been left out of the article and its a very important event, a factual even. It's dicussed elsewhere on Wikipedia yet in the Israel article it's left out. |
|||
If its my wording, how can i add info about this event without it being remove? Any advice? Or am i and other people not allowed to mention the event on that page and pretend like it never happened? |
|||
== Puppets & puppeteers == |
|||
I don't have too much to add to the latest allegation. We'll let the RCU take it's course, and hopefully it will show us which accounts are which. -- [[User:JamesTeterenko|JamesTeterenko]] 01:57, 8 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Godiva's Hymn deletion == |
|||
I have been the main contributor for [[Godiva's Hymn]]. I looked at the AFD header, and I'm not sure I understand the lingo you use for the reasons. Could you elaborate? |
|||
[[User:Sveiki|Sveiki]] 22:51, 11 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Godiva's Hymn Deletion (edits) == |
|||
When I first noticed the proposition for deletion, I looked into the Wikipedia policies. I found that I do agree with the idea that this is not the place for a store of lyrics (especially considering that the lyrics are available from the external links). I have removed the only claim that is not verifiable (that the song begain in 1921) until I can find a citation for it. As for the notability of the article, that I do question and have commented on in [[Talk:Godiva's Hymn]]. I am not offended by your deletion proposal, hopefully you find me to be one of those people in the Wikipedia community who is actually involved for the benefit of others and not himself. |
|||
[[User:Sveiki|Sveiki]] 04:11, 12 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==ACJC== |
|||
The article actually *was* deleted a while ago, when no-one objected to the notice. I only became aware of the article's history today, and made the decision to undelete it. |
|||
My view is that the ACJC is significant enough to warrant an separate article. My decision to undelete it was made in accordance with Wikipedia policy, unless I've misunderstood the rules for situations like this (for this particular type of deletion, I believe it's sufficient for an admin to judge the subject as notable). |
|||
Please let me know if you disagree with this decision. [[User:CJCurrie|CJCurrie]] 04:16, 13 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*Perhaps it would make sense to deal with the matter in a standard afd. [[User:CJCurrie|CJCurrie]] 04:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Canada-Israel Committee]] == |
|||
I started an article on the [[Canada-Israel Committee]]. You probably know more about it and its staff than I do. Would you care to expand it? [[User:TruthbringerToronto|TruthbringerToronto]] ([[User_talk:TruthbringerToronto|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/TruthbringerToronto|contribs)]] 06:25, 13 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== ACJC == |
|||
No one is saying the ACJC is "as notable" as the CJC or B'nai Brith but it does exist, we do have an article on it so a link is called for and the article should not suggest that Jews are a monolith. If your RFD succeeds we can talk about removing the reference but until then the reference should stay. [[User:Ex-Homey|Ex-Homey]] 21:49, 13 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Context - the sentence in the Canadian Jewish history article (which goes up to the present day as there is no seperate article on Jewish Canadians today) refers to the political organization of the Jewish community and mentions Bnai brith as a right of centre group and the CJC as centrist - it's fair then to mention the ACJC as at least an example of a left wing group (arguably the largest one since the United Jewish People's Order is made up mostly of people in their 70s and 80s). In the CJC article it's fair to mention who opposes them, the BB (arguably they do oppose the CJC though formally they do not) on the right and ACJC as a small group on the left. Saying they are a small group makes it clear they are not "as notable" as the other two but if we don't mention them it's implied that either the CJC is a left wing group or there is no one to the left of them. As we have an article on the ACJC there's no reason not to link to them. If you prefer, we can change it to "they are opposed on the left by small groups such as the Alliance of Concerned Jewish Canadians" but there's no reason to omit a link.[[User:Ex-Homey|Ex-Homey]] 22:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Also, much of the ACJC's material directly criticises the CJC - it is standard in wikipedia as per NPOV to include references to critics.[[User:Ex-Homey|Ex-Homey]] 22:21, 13 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Vaughan lawsuits section== |
|||
I appreciate the changes you made to this section, as I was in a rush when I wrote it up. I don't mean to break any wikipedia laws or anything like that, but what is your personal thoughts on all these lawsuits? And even more generally, about all this anti-Vaughan related material coming from the Star and by certain users on wikipedia. As a man in your position (I won't reveal any personal details) can you offer any insight into this? [[User:ED209|ED209]] 01:08, 14 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:*I am glad we finally see eye-to-eye on a few things. Also, I assure you I am not affliated with [[user:Mangerno]]. This user looks like [[user:VaughanWatch]]. [[User:ED209|ED209]] 01:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==ED209== |
|||
The only interactions I've had with him have been over his legal threats. I don't have any input to the Vaughn nonsense. Sorry. [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|(talk)]] 01:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:I'd support an RFC. -- [[User:JamesTeterenko|JamesTeterenko]] 01:39, 15 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==RoyalFrush== |
|||
I agree, there are reasons to be suspicious, but I just don't like blocking accounts for sockpuppetry when the evidence isn't clear. Nothing sucks more for a legit newcomer than being mistaken for a sockpuppet. The one edit RF made wasn't abusive. [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<font color="orange">'''juice'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup> 00:48, 18 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Hello == |
|||
--[[User:Get-the-F-out-of-here|Get-the-F-out-of-here]] 23:15, 19 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== [[William Southgate]] == |
|||
hi, |
|||
um, why did you leave a canned message on my talk page when that pages shows that I'm clearly not a new wikipedian and when I was following the instructions on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography]] to the letter. (save bio template, edit it, comment out sections which don't have info yet)?? It would be better to wait at least half an hour brfore taking such action when a template is used. [[User:Dramatic|dramatic]] 02:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== =REMEMBER ME== == |
|||
hey, it's [[user:Bob Santanos|Bob Santanos]] from '96! You know, respond on m y page, id love to talk again [[user talk:Bob Santanos|talk]] |
|||
==Michael Chabon== |
|||
I didn't ''add'' him, per se — I just revised a category that had already been placed there by someone else. For what it's worth, I think the article does address why the category's there; it made me do a double-take at first, too. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 07:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Canadian food articles == |
|||
Hi, |
|||
would you help me get some Canadian food articles to [[WP:GA|good article]] status?? --[[User:TheM62Manchester|TheM62Manchester]] 15:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Page on Rabbi Steven Greenberg == |
|||
I've been trying to remove libelous content from the page on Rabbi Greenberg. I'm new to Wikipedia, and not sure how to go about this. Can you help? It's in the "controversy" section. Unreferenced personal accounts being used as fact to make claims that aren't true. Thanks.[[User:Steviegee|Steviegee]] 16:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:12, 31 August 2006
THERE IS NO MAN UGLIER THAN COREY SHEFMAN