Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Flavours & Fragrances: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:49, 1 September 2016

European Flavours & Fragrances

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn't appear to be notable. Nominated for CSD twice, and the article appears to have been created via AfC, but I'm not sure if whether it's been properly accepted or not. Adam9007 (talk) 02:36, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Löschen as this is still A7 and G11 material but the nominator apparently believes being "an accredited member" is sufficient ~~(they are violating their interaction ban against me as it is)~~. This has nothing at all for independent notability and substance. I'll also note this was actually moved to mainspace by the author themselves, a recent concern regarding Drafts, so it was never actually reviewed (the author moved it twice without consultation of reviewers). SwisterTwister talk 02:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have striked out part of the statement above, as there is no interaction ban in-place between Adam9007 and SwisterTwister. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- The nominator? You mean me? Interaction ban? To whom are you referring? I'm not on an interaction ban with anyone. Oh, and I'm not the only one who's contested the A7. Adam9007 (talk) 02:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note for closing admin: No one else ever actually contested an A7 here, and I have kindly asked the user to stay away from me given they continuously remove my changes (see User_talk:Adam9007/Archive_2#Article); one other time before I mentioned my concerns about their removing my changes, also. SwisterTwister talk 02:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Did you read the talk page? Adam9007 (talk) 02:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete should have died at CSD - David Gerard (talk) 09:58, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. I don't see any in-depth coverage. One of its products was nominated for FiFi Awards, I don't think that cuts it. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 :({{Find sources AFD|European Flavours & Fragrances}})
 Subject doesn't appear to be notable. Nominated for CSD twice, and the article appears to have been created via AfC, but I'm not sure if whether it's been properly accepted or not. [[User:Adam9007|Adam9007]] ([[User talk:Adam9007|talk]]) 02:36, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''' as this is still A7 and G11 material but the nominator apparently believes being "an accredited member" is sufficient (they are violating their interaction ban against me as it is). This  has nothing at all for independent notability and substance. I'll also note this was actually moved to mainspace by the author themselves, a recent concern regarding Drafts, so it was never actually reviewed (the author moved it twice without consultation of reviewers). [[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 02:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' as this is still A7 and G11 material but the nominator apparently believes being "an accredited member" is sufficient <s>(they are violating their interaction ban against me as it is)</s>. This  has nothing at all for independent notability and substance. I'll also note this was actually moved to mainspace by the author themselves, a recent concern regarding Drafts, so it was never actually reviewed (the author moved it twice without consultation of reviewers). [[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 02:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
+:::<small>I have striked out part of the statement above, as there is ''no'' interaction ban in-place between Adam9007 and SwisterTwister. [[User:Oshwah|<b><span style="color:#C00000">~Oshwah~</span></b>]]<sup><small><b>[[User_talk:Oshwah|<span style="color:blue">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Oshwah|<span style="color:green">(contribs)</span>]]</b></small></sup>  01:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)</small>
 **The nominator? You mean me? Interaction ban? To whom are you referring? I'm not on an interaction ban with anyone. Oh, and I'm not the only one who's contested the A7. [[User:Adam9007|Adam9007]] ([[User talk:Adam9007|talk]]) 02:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 *Note for closing admin: No one else ever actually contested an A7 here, and I have kindly asked the user to stay away from me given they continuously remove my changes (see [[User_talk:Adam9007/Archive_2#Article]]); one other time before I mentioned my concerns about their removing my changes, also. [[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 02:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)