User talk:TheresNoTime: Difference between revisions
TheresNoTime (talk | contribs) OneClickArchiver archived 1 discussion to User talk:Samtar/Archive 10 |
Gerda Arendt (talk | contribs) →Precious: look (twice) |
||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
{{user precious|header=inviting edit notice|thanks=for quality articles such as [[Cafe Royal Cocktail Book]], for welcoming users, watching over recent additions and fighting vandalism, for offering more service as admin, for your [[User talk:Samtar/Editnotice|inviting edit notice]] and "This user's mind-reading skills are not so good.", - Sam,}} --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 20:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC) |
{{user precious|header=inviting edit notice|thanks=for quality articles such as [[Cafe Royal Cocktail Book]], for welcoming users, watching over recent additions and fighting vandalism, for offering more service as admin, for your [[User talk:Samtar/Editnotice|inviting edit notice]] and "This user's mind-reading skills are not so good.", - Sam,}} --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 20:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC) |
||
:{{re|Gerda Arendt}} Thank you! {{p|:D}} This means a lot! I'd like to think my edit notice is inviting, even if it is just because of that ''adorable'' kitten -- [[User:Samtar|'''sam'''''tar'']] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Samtar|talk]] or [[Special:Contributions/Samtar|stalk]]</small></sup> 20:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC) |
:{{re|Gerda Arendt}} Thank you! {{p|:D}} This means a lot! I'd like to think my edit notice is inviting, even if it is just because of that ''adorable'' kitten -- [[User:Samtar|'''sam'''''tar'']] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Samtar|talk]] or [[Special:Contributions/Samtar|stalk]]</small></sup> 20:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC) |
||
:: If you want your message to be read, you'd probably have to find a less attractive image, like in [[User talk:Gerda Arendt/Editnotice|mine]]. [[User talk:Opabinia regalis#no kitten?|Look!]] --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 20:38, 4 December 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:38, 4 December 2016
![]() | My few and most humbly appreciated barnstars, awards and tasty treats now reside here |
This is TheresNoTime's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23Auto-archiving period: 21 days ![]() |
![]() | |
Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #206 |
RFA
Might be a bit early, but I'm thinking it's time to welcome you to the team! RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:58, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
- As requested on IRC, here is a parade. *parades* Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
RfA successful
Congratulations, I have just closed your RfA as successful and made you an administrator. Take a look at the Administrators' guide and the administrators' reading list if you haven't read those already. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to get in touch on my talk page. WJBscribe (talk) 15:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you WJBscribe, and to everyone who voted (supports and opposes alike) - thank you. I will take the criticism on-board and will improve both in areas of policy and in content contribution and creation. I won't let you, the community which makes this place tick, down -- samtar talk or stalk 16:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Successful RfA
- Congratulations for adminship !! CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 15:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- Congratulations dude! Now go rock the boat. Lourdes 15:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- Congrats, my man! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:10, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- Well done, now WP:RFPP is thataway and there's probably a backlog... Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:20, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- Congratulations! :) Patient Zerotalk 16:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- Now be alert for those vandals and trolls here since your passing of your RFA. Good luck ;) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:33, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- Congrats from me too! You'll do a great job. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 16:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- Congratulations Samtar :). –Davey2010Talk 16:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- Congrats! ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 17:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Commiserations!Congratulations! — Jkudlick • t • c • s 18:06, 4 December 2016 (UTC)- Congrats, friend! — MusikAnimal talk 20:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Congratulations on your successful RFA! In a self-imposed tradition I'm sure many people wish I would stop, allow me to impart the words of wisdom I received from the puppy after my RFA passed – almost ten long, sordid, I-really-really-should-have-found-a-better-hobby years ago: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales, because if it did, it would be much, much better. All rights released under GFDL. |
A beer for you!
![]() |
Congratulations on becoming an administrator Sam! I knew you were going to succeed. Enjoy some beer. To you becoming an admin! :) Class455 (talk) 16:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC) |
- @Class455: Thank you, as long as I don't get done for admin-ing under the influence! -- samtar talk or stalk 18:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Something to go with the beer!
![]() |
Congratulations on passing your RfA! — Gestrid (talk) 17:32, 4 December 2016 (UTC) |
- Cheers Gestrid :-) -- samtar talk or stalk 18:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Lets get the ball rolling with these - congratulations on your RfA and best of luck, you're going to be a great administrator! Mike1901 (talk) 20:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC) |
- @Mike1901: Thanks Mike! :) -- samtar talk or stalk 20:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Precious
inviting edit notice
Thank you for quality articles such as Cafe Royal Cocktail Book, for welcoming users, watching over recent additions and fighting vandalism, for offering more service as admin, for your inviting edit notice and "This user's mind-reading skills are not so good.", - Sam, you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Vielen Dank!
This means a lot! I'd like to think my edit notice is inviting, even if it is just because of that adorable kitten -- samtar talk or stalk 20:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- If you want your message to be read, you'd probably have to find a less attractive image, like in mine. Look! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:38, 4 December 2016 (UTC)