User talk:Enthusiast01: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:26, 3 April 2017

Barnstar

In the fine Wikipedia tradition, I am happy to give you this barnstar to recognize all your hard work. TeaDrinker (talk) 22:34, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For a great deal of hard work to improve articles on a wide range of topics. TeaDrinker (talk) 22:34, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thanks for your work on the La Trobes or Latrobes. Nice to see the articles developing. Victuallers (talk) 15:21, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Continuing Appropriations Act, 2014

On 9 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Continuing Appropriations Act, 2014, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2014, which resolved the 2013 U.S. government shutdown and debt-ceiling crisis, may just be kicking the can down the road? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Continuing Appropriations Act, 2014. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 09:35, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear Ewawer, thank you for your great job in expanding the article I created about mixed bathing. Keep up the good work on Wikipedia! You are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam^Talk 04:25, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thanks for your awesome work on the Bikini article. I have been looking for a good copyeditor for so long now, that I find it hard to believe that the article finally has someone of you caliber to work on it. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 13:14, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposals for a Palestinian state

Hey, would you like to help us with the lead section oft the article : Proposals for a Palestinian state ? Would be very nice. Thank you Miraclexix (talk) 14:45, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please see the talk page? I have some issues with your edit. nableezy - 23:59, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have revised the heading of this section from We need your help! to Proposals for a Palestinian state, in harmony with WP:TPOC (Section headings). Miraclexix (talk) 14:18, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		Thank you for the professional teamwork! Miraclexix (talk) 14:18, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Constitutional basis of taxation in Australia into Section 96 of the Constitution of Australia. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. You were already advised back in January to start doing this. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you are having trouble understanding what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 15:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Your addition to Energy in Victoria (Australia) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 03:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Your addition to Cabcharge Australia Ltd has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 22:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 02:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Enthusiast01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

for reasons previously discussed Enthusiast01 (talk) 03:51, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I am unblocking your account, as this post shows you have a good understanding of copyright law and how it applies to Wikipedia editing; and this post demonstrates that you don't intend to use multiple accts to avoid scrutiny. Welcome back, and happy editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 04:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Enthusiast01, "for reasons previously discussed" is not going to be clear to those unaware of your block appeal before this one. Do you want me to link to it here to provide context? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do. Nice to see you are keeping an eye on me. Enthusiast01 (talk) 03:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have your talk page watchlisted. And like I stated, I know how hard it is to stop editing this site for good, no matter how much you want to.

Anyway, for those reviewing this matter, Enthusiast01 made a case for being unblocked in December 2016; see here and here. He was very close to being unblocked, as is clear by Diannaa's final response on the matter, but he was upset and left instead of taking the time to reply when given a clear opportunity for an unblock. It seems he needed some time to cool off, which is clearly why he's back now. If the reviewing administrator thinks this needs to go back to WP:AN, I'd be willing to set up another block review. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flyer22, the usual course of action is to first contact the blocking admin, as they are typically contacted regardless. Also, no need for a big drama-rama, he has met the unblock conditions that I set out. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 04:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that was quick. Enthusiast01 (talk) 04:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa, the blocking administrator's opinion being important is why I pinged you above. As for a big drama-rama, I was thinking logically -- that the request might be declined, given the statements of others at WP:AN. In any case, if you feel that he has met the unblock conditions, there's nothing more to state. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:49, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On a side note: Enthusiast01, you did pop into my head hours before your above unblock request. That's because, when scrolling my watchlist, this longtime editor caught my eye after using one of your favorite edit summaries: "Tidy." Anyway, I hope to see you editing well. Remember to keep sourcing (inline references) in mind. You know, more than you usually do. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IP address, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RIR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Parliament of Western Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prorogue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mishna

Those were nice edits you made to the Mishna article today. Debresser (talk) 16:57, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
 [[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Enthusiast01|your contributions]] to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from [[:Constitutional basis of taxation in Australia]] into [[:Section 96 of the Constitution of Australia]]. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, [[WP:Copyrights|Wikipedia's licensing]] does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at [[Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying--> You were already advised back in January to start doing this. Please have a look at {{diff|Section 96 of the Constitution of Australia|714242069|713666734|this edit summary}} as an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you are having trouble understanding what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 15:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
+I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at {{diff|Wine in religious communities of the Middle East|prev|714270928|this edit summary}} as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 23:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 == July 2016 ==