User talk:Ryanoo

Hello the link is not outdated the definition is the same. if you have a new link please send it to me. if there is to be a revision it should be in 2020. otherwise, U.S Census have not changed the definition. Please porvide link. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mameab1989 (talk • contribs) 09:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your report on Mameab1989 (talk · contribs)

Hi, sorry but I couldn't see an obvious pattern of vandalism on this user. I'm sure I'm missing something and they are indeed close to edit warring but when in doubt, I prefer not to act on WP:AIV. You might want to raise this issue on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, though! If you need further help, please don't hesitate to post on my talk page or to put {{helpme}} followed by your question on this page. -- Luk ^talk 13:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Omar Gamal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Abdulaziz Waseli

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Ryanoo, thanks for creating Abdulaziz Waseli!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:56, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

AIV

Why are you reporting an editor that's already blocked? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Apologies are owed

I was investigating the disruption at Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories, and out of my pure stupidity I blocked you for edit warring for about two minutes. I've of course unblocked your account and I sincerely apologize for what happened. Good news to share though: Those two other accounts that kept adding vandalism have been indef'd ;-). Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:34, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your note of apology, I really appreciate it and the fact that you are reaching out. Mistakes happens as none of us are perfect as humans. Ryanoo (talk) 07:44, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar is awarded to those who show great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. – Lionel(talk) 11:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Here, here! Thanks for committing your time and energy toward recent changes patrolling and toward cleaning up vandalism - it's not easy work and it's quite a thankless undertaking; just know that your good work has not gone unnoticed and that we appreciate it very much! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:03, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

~Oshwah~ Thank you so much for your kind and supportive words :) Ryanoo (talk) 07:39, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

No problem; it's part of what I do around here ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Also, if you're not using Twikle to aid with reverting vandalism and warning users, I highly recommend it. You can enable the tool by navigating to your preferences page and clicking on the "Gadgets" tab. Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:45, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you so much :) I will enable it.Ryanoo (talk) 07:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

No problem - I've been patrolling recent changes and reverting vandalism for quite a long time. If you have questions or need help with anything in that area, don't hesitate to leave me a message - I'll be glad to lend a hand and answer any questions. Keep up the awesome work! Continue reverting vandalism, warning users correctly, and reporting repeat offenders to AIV for a few more weeks - and I'll make you a rollbacker. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:58, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you so much :) Ryanoo (talk) 14:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

London Zoo

Hi Ryanoo, before I request further assistance for consensus, can you tell me why this trivia [1] was restored? Thank you, 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:04, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Sorry about the random revert

We just so happened to be looking at Politics of the Philippines at the same time. TheConnorMan (talk) 08:23, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Never mind my friend :) Ryanoo (talk) 04:31, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:49, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind advice. Ryanoo (talk) 04:33, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Seriously, if you don't slow down and stop wrongful reversions [2], I'll file an ANI. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:55, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

• Ryanoo, you were indeed incorrect on that edit, as you were with the copyvio on Mike Maroney. I've looked at a few of your recent edits and the others I saw were legitimate, but these issues have to be addressed, since I don't want to look at any more edits. Please be more careful in your reverts--and leave an edit summary, lest you also be accused of Twinkle/rollback abuse. Drmies (talk) 03:01, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank you, Drmies. There was this, too, from a few days ago, which was never answered [3]. It does look like abuse of the tools. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:04, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
    • Yep. Drmies (talk) 03:06, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
      • @Drmies I try my best to fight vandalism and warning possible vandals and you can check the rest of my edits. I might accidentally (not on purpose) make few mistakes as I am a human and It happens with other users too, but I always try my best to avoid mistakes. Thank you.
        • I'm sure of that, and I appreciate it--but sometimes maybe slow down. This IP editor here seems to know what they're doing, for instance. If you take the time to write an edit summary, you kind of force yourself to look again if only to formulate your thoughts, and that can be very helpful. I've done it too, and reverted myself when necessary. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 03:17, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
          • We all make mistakes, but 'it happens to other users' is weasely, Ryanoo, and good intentions aren't good reason to restore lousy content, just because you see an IP making the edit. It didn't help that you removed my two warnings this evening without responding. If this happens again I will file a report. Thank you, 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
            • 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 As per my edit here [4], I don't think that It was a wrong one as you shouldn't remove sourced information without a valid justification. The paragraph talks about the use of London Zoo in popular culture ( Film, TV, Literature, Music and Video games ). May I know why you deleted the sourced information of the video games section, although It is indeed related to the topic?? What is the difference between the TV section and the video games one??!
              • It seems to be a trivial bit, which is indicated also by that unacceptable source. The other mentions seem to be better verified--but remember, even if those are also trivial and unverified, it's not up to the editor (in this case the IP editor) to instantly clean up the entire article. Drmies (talk) 03:26, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
                • It was subsequently reverted by an administrator for lack of reliable sourcing. I have misgivings here..... 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:27, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
                  • @Drmies Thank you for your advice.Ryanoo (talk) 22:48, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
                    • Thank you for your contributions; you too, 2601. I went through the zoo and scrubbed a bit more. Drmies (talk) 03:49, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Vandal

How do you report vandals. There is a lot of false information on Eric Bledsoe and Kostas Antetokonmpo. Sorry for my English Jerry44west (talk) 04:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Never mind my friend. I hope this link could help you [5] Ryanoo (talk) 04:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

hi why do you think my changes were not constructive?

Homosexual is considered outdated and offensive by many including GLAAD, https://www.glaad.org/reference/lgbtq, my changes brings the pages in line with standards that im sure are in the majority for wikipedia articles about gay induviduals, for example Ian Mckellen "He has been openly gay since 1988" i understand why you might think my change was meaningless but it clearly has meaning to a lot of people — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:3D09:1E7F:FB79:11E9:FACA:D13E:F2D5 (talk) 03:36, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Disagreement on the use of the word ‘vandalism’

Hello!

I wish to voice my concern for the incorrect use of the word ‘vandalism’ referring to the reason as to why you removed my edits. Time and time again these truths have been proven, shown by the overall animosity showed by liberals.

For example:

Green Mountain College and it’s Day of Absence and how it had degraded into a show of tribal disorder against white students and faculty to the point of hostages being taken and yelled at.

The recent attempt by one Steven Crowder to receive apology from a liberal woman who had openly demanded for his van (and passengers in said van) to be firebombed on Twitter; note this threat was also accompanied by his location.

The case of Samantha Ray Myers who had raped her ex boyfriend at machete point yet has not received any charges of sexual misconduct or rape. Including the news outlets clearly avoiding the obvious term of rape.

There are plenty of examples still out there and I will be happy to provide them upon request and I would love to hear your side of this as well.

Soulishar (talk) 04:41, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Remember to warn users ;-)

Hey man, thanks for taking the time to patrol recent changes and revert vandalism. It's a thankless job and I appreciate all the help that I can get. Just remember that after you revert such edits to warn the users; else I won't be able to justify blocking them if the disruption continues and they won't ever be asked to stop ;-). Thanks again, and keep up the excellent work! Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:46, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

@~Oshwah~ I am sorry for the late reply, I just noticed your message right now. I would like to thank you for your kind reminder and advice, I will try my best to warn every user in the right way. Thank you again for making Wikipedia a better place :). Ryanoo (talk) 18:19, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

No problem :-). I hope your day is going well and I wish you happy editing. Keep up the excellent work! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:22, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Stoke Gifford

Hi Ryan. Re your revert here, do you think "Alex Stedman" might be notable? Many Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:22, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Line

Middayexpress? check this [6] [7] 84.0.46.185 (talk) 00:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Hello, I'm Ronhjones. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition at [:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Arboleh&diff=prev&oldid=853160616]. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. If you put in a "sock" template, then you must complete the job and go to WP:SPI and file the proper report, otherwise you are harassing the user Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 14:37, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ronhjones  Thank you for your message. This Somali user is a very persistent sock puppeteer who has been using many fake accounts in order to promote his racist Afrocentric agenda and vandalize Wikipedia, this user is trying to whitewash Horn Africans and link them to Middle Easterners and North Africans while distancing Horn Africans from their other fellow East Africans brothers which is very racist. At the same time, He is trying to black-wash Middle Easterners and North Africans and linking them to horn Africans:), this guy got really no life, he has been using hundreds of sock puppet accounts in order to vandalize Wikipedia and promote his Afrocentric agenda, for example, he is trying to deattach modern Egyptians from their ancient Egyptians origins and link the Egyptian civilization to Sub Saharan Africans who have nothing at all to do with Egypt or Egyptians which is extremely racist and ridiculous!!!. I have already filed a sock puppeting report against him but It was reverted because some other user before filed a sock puppeting report against the same user and the result was inconclusive because he is using proxy. You can check his IP history and you will find that he uses only proxies and that he never logged in through a legit IP address which means that he is trying to hide something, also this account was created shortly after the block of confirmed sock puppets Middayexpress, Soupforone, Geneticanthro, ....etc and he has been making the same edits on the same pages with almost identical edit summaries. You can also check the behaviors of this account and Middayexpress/Soupforone, you will find that the behavioral evidence is very clear and unmistakable. Unfortunately, the Wikipedia regulations against sock puppeting are very loose. For example, in this case of this Arboleh (a.k.a Middayexpress, Soupforone, ...etc) I don't think that a checkuser will be beneficial or conclusive as this user has a long history of using proxies and Middayexpress/Soupforone before insisted on the use of checkuser and then later was confirmed to be a very persistent sock puppeteer. The behavioral evidence in this case is pretty clear. Unfortunately, users like this, are why Wikipedia occasionally gets a bad name. Thank you. Ryanoo (talk) 16:43, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

If you know it's a proxy, the standard procedure is to request a block (policy, Wikiproject), which might help to some extent. LittlePuppers (talk) 01:18, 4 August 2018 (UTC)