Jump to content

User talk:Marjdabi: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Marjdabi (talk | contribs)
Removing some old unnecessary stuff.
→‎Notification: new section
Line 37: Line 37:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting {{myprefs|3|check=Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary}}.
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting {{myprefs|3|check=Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary}}.
Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> [[User:Canterbury Tail|<b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|<i style="color: Blue;">talk</i>]] 12:50, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> [[User:Canterbury Tail|<b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|<i style="color: Blue;">talk</i>]] 12:50, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

== Notification ==


{{Ivm|2='''''Please read this notification carefully,''' it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''

A [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive253#Request to amend sanctions on Syrian civil war articles|community decision]] has authorised the use of [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|general sanctions]] for pages related to the [[Syrian Civil War]] and the [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant]]. The details of these sanctions are described [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|here]]. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a '''one [[Help:Reverting|revert]] per twenty-four hours [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#Other revert rules|restriction]]''', as described [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant#1RR|here]].

[[Wikipedia:General sanctions|General sanctions]] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behaviour]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant#Log of notifications|here]]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. }} [[User:Fitzcarmalan|Fitzcarmalan]] ([[User talk:Fitzcarmalan|talk]]) 13:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:06, 23 September 2018

Focus on Turkey-SDF articles

Hello Marjdabi, you seems to have a special focus on Turkish military operation in Afrin, Syrian Democratic Forces, Democratic Federation of Northern Syria, 2016–present purges in Turkey. I have some expertise on the issue and can discuss with you on why your current way to edit is troublesome for the community. If you want to contribute positively, following Wikipedia's objective to document these subjects fairly, feel free to discuss with me on what you want to do, and how Wikipedia(ns) will react to your actions. Many of us made wrongful edits at first and came to understand wikipedia after trials, errors, and discussions. Yug (talk) 20:59, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The articles related to Turkey, SDF and other controversial topics do not cover anything that mentions the SDF's controversy. I have tried to add on some details to make the articles unbiased but the edits were removed citing no consensus reached. How can I report some facts even if some people object to them? Does Wikipedia rather report what the consensus is reached upon rather than actual events which took place? For example, a main issue during Afrin campaign - The suicide bombing by the SDF was not mentioned in the article at all, and once I mentioned it it was removed for not having the consensus reached for the topic. And once I reverted it I've gotten a 7 day block, which is now over. Yug Marjdabi (talk) 17:52, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Suicide bombing is not a willful repeated strategy by SDF. "Taking a grenade" -sacrifice of one soldier to protect the team- is a common, all armies behavior based on individual soldiers' initiatives. Such cases have been reported in Afghanistan by US marines, an action for wish the soldier "taking a grenade" often win a postumous medal. It been reported by SDF as rare exemplary cases, in Kobane (1) and in Afrin (1). In all these cases, it isn't the fruit of long term planning and terrorist thinking, it emerge from being unexpectedly attacked or trapped, and an individual soldier chose to sacrifice him/herself so to slow his opponent's advance. Both Kobane and Afrin are rare and typical of these. There is no complex conspiracy or controversy to it. It's just sad. It has no common ground with WW2 kamikazes or Al Quaeda massive usage of suicide bombing. Are you willing to showcase these few cases as terrorist practices and controversies ? If so, yes, you will meet resistances because it's simply it's that a controversy. Yug (talk) 19:00, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have never seen an example of US troop killing himself with a grenade to take out a tank. I believe it needs a mention. Also the Pro SDF news media has praised her as a suicide bomber "Wrapped in bomb" Which has 0 mention in the article. Marjdabi (talk) 19:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

What do you mean vandalize. I corrected the page from hurricane to storm, Pierre cb Marjdabi (talk) 22:39, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No you did not: First, you changed every occurence of "Hurricane" in the text with "Tropical Storm" and thus completely messing the text (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hurricane_Florence&diff=859569736&oldid=859566468). Second, you renamed the article as Tropical Storm while the name has to remain the one of the highest intensity of it. This is either vandalism or not bothering reading the rules of Wikipedia on top of not reading the article you changed. Pierre cb (talk) 01:59, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, sorry. Marjdabi (talk) 02:28, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add unsourced information as you did to Portal:Current events/2018 September 16. Thank you. Wakari07 (talk) 21:23, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use edit summaries

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Canterbury Tail talk 12:50, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Fitzcarmalan (talk) 13:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]