Jagdish Tytler: Difference between revisions
WP:BLP requires us to mention both sides of the allegations. By removing these lines, you are making it obvious that you intend to maintain this article as a one sided WP:ATTACKPAGE against this living person. |
|||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
==1984 anti-Sikh riots== |
==1984 anti-Sikh riots== |
||
Tytler has been accused of involvement in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots in India |
Tytler has been accused of involvement in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots in India. The riots had occurred after Sikh bodyguards [[Assassination of Indira Gandhi|assassinated]] Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. Tytler stated that he was present at [[Teen Murti Bhavan]] for the funeral ceremony with Gandhi's body and was in mourning at the time when these events occurred at Gurudwara Pulbangash, situated near Azad Market.<ref name="BBC_Feb2014"/><ref name="IE_no_fresh_FIR">{{cite news |title=No fresh FIR against Congress leader Jagdish Tytler, CBI tells Delhi court |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/influencing-witness-no-fresh-fir-against-jagdish-tytler-cbi-to-court/ |accessdate=19 January 2019 |publisher=The Indian Express |date=9 July 2015 |language=en-IN}}</ref> He has not been charged with any crimes related to the 1984 riots.<ref name="no_charges">{{cite news |title=Clips show Jagdish Tytler confessing about riots: Sikh leader |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/clips-show-tytler-confessing-about-riots-sikh-leader/articleshow/62796479.cms |publisher=The Times of India |access-date=16 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180206142547/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/clips-show-tytler-confessing-about-riots-sikh-leader/articleshow/62796479.cms |archive-date=6 February 2018 |dead-url=no |df=dmy-all }}</ref> |
||
On April 2004, the Indian National Congress announced [[Sajjan Kumar]], Jagdish Tytler, [[R. K. Anand]] and others allegedly involved in the anti-Sikh riots, as its candidates for [[Indian Parliament]] elections for constituencies in and around Delhi. Sajjan Kumar, R. K. Anand, Darshan Shastri and [[H. K. L. Bhagat]] were accused by several independent commissions of inquiry of being complicit in the riots, including the People's Union for Civil Liberties, the People's Union for Democratic Rights and the [[Citizen's Justice Committee]].{{cn|date=January 2019}} |
On April 2004, the Indian National Congress announced [[Sajjan Kumar]], Jagdish Tytler, [[R. K. Anand]] and others allegedly involved in the anti-Sikh riots, as its candidates for [[Indian Parliament]] elections for constituencies in and around Delhi. Sajjan Kumar, R. K. Anand, Darshan Shastri and [[H. K. L. Bhagat]] were accused by several independent commissions of inquiry of being complicit in the riots, including the People's Union for Civil Liberties, the People's Union for Democratic Rights and the [[Citizen's Justice Committee]].{{cn|date=January 2019}} |
||
In 2019, Tytler said of the controversy surrounding the anti-Sikh riot accusations that {{quote|I do not understand why is this controversy. There were 5,000 people at the function, I was one of them. There is no [[First information report|FIR]] against me. CBI cleared me three times in its inquiry. You should ask the BJP if there is any FIR against me.<ref name="statement_FIR">{{cite news |title=Sheila Dikshit backs Jagdish Tytler's presence at her charge taking ceremony amid attacks by AAP, BJP |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/dikshit-backs-tytlers-presence-at-her-charge-taking-ceremony-amid-attacks-by-aap-bjp/articleshow/67559960.cms |accessdate=16 January 2019 |publisher=The Times of India |date=16 January 2019}}</ref> }} |
|||
===Nanavati Commission=== |
===Nanavati Commission=== |
||
Line 57: | Line 55: | ||
In December 2008, a two-member CBI team was sent to New York to record the statements of two eyewitnesses, Jasbir Singh and Surinder Singh. The two witnesses have stated that they saw Tytler lead a mob during the riots, but did not want to come to India as they feared for their security.<ref>[http://ibnlive.in.com/news/anti-sikh-riots-witness-to-give-statement-to-cbi-in-us/81216-3.html Anti Sikh riots witness to give statement to CBI in US]</ref> |
In December 2008, a two-member CBI team was sent to New York to record the statements of two eyewitnesses, Jasbir Singh and Surinder Singh. The two witnesses have stated that they saw Tytler lead a mob during the riots, but did not want to come to India as they feared for their security.<ref>[http://ibnlive.in.com/news/anti-sikh-riots-witness-to-give-statement-to-cbi-in-us/81216-3.html Anti Sikh riots witness to give statement to CBI in US]</ref> |
||
==="Clean chit" by CBI |
==="Clean chit" by CBI === |
||
In March 2009, the CBI filed its final report on investigation into the riots cases and cleared Jagdish Tytler.<ref name="BBC_Feb2014">{{cite news |title=Jagdish Tytler: My own daughter asks if I killed Sikhs |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-26237133 |accessdate=16 January 2019 |publisher=BBC |date=19 February 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180208214313/http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-26237133 |archive-date=8 February 2018 |dead-url=no |df=dmy-all }}</ref> The [[Bharatiya Janata Party|BJP]] which was then in opposition alleged that "such a [[wikt:Special:Search/clean chit|clean chit]] ahead of the elections" implied that the CBI had been misused.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-cbi-files-final-report-in-anti-sikh-riot-case-against-tytler-1243441 |agency=PTI |work=DNA |title=CBI files final report in anti-Sikh riot case against Tytler |date=28 March 2009 |accessdate=2019-01-17}}</ref> On 2 April, CBI claimed there was lack of sufficient evidence against Tytler and sought to close the riot case.<ref name="TheHindu_CBI_Cleanchit2010" /> |
In March 2009, the CBI filed its final report on investigation into the riots cases and cleared Jagdish Tytler.<ref name="BBC_Feb2014">{{cite news |title=Jagdish Tytler: My own daughter asks if I killed Sikhs |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-26237133 |accessdate=16 January 2019 |publisher=BBC |date=19 February 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180208214313/http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-26237133 |archive-date=8 February 2018 |dead-url=no |df=dmy-all }}</ref> The [[Bharatiya Janata Party|BJP]] which was then in opposition alleged that "such a [[wikt:Special:Search/clean chit|clean chit]] ahead of the elections" implied that the CBI had been misused.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-cbi-files-final-report-in-anti-sikh-riot-case-against-tytler-1243441 |agency=PTI |work=DNA |title=CBI files final report in anti-Sikh riot case against Tytler |date=28 March 2009 |accessdate=2019-01-17}}</ref> On 2 April, CBI claimed there was lack of sufficient evidence against Tytler and sought to close the riot case.<ref name="TheHindu_CBI_Cleanchit2010" /> |
||
On 7 April 2009, the then Home Minister, [[P. Chidambaram]], had [[List of shoe throwing incidents|a shoe thrown at him]] by [[Jarnail Singh (journalist)|Jarnail Singh]], a Sikh journalist, during a press conference in Delhi. Singh, who works at the [[Hindi]] daily ''[[Dainik Jagran]]'', was dissatisfied with Chidambaram's answer to a question about the "clean chit" given to Tytler.<ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videoshow/4369344.cms The Times of India]</ref> |
On 7 April 2009, the then Home Minister, [[P. Chidambaram]], had [[List of shoe throwing incidents|a shoe thrown at him]] by [[Jarnail Singh (journalist)|Jarnail Singh]], a Sikh journalist, during a press conference in Delhi. Singh, who works at the [[Hindi]] daily ''[[Dainik Jagran]]'', was dissatisfied with Chidambaram's answer to a question about the "clean chit" given to Tytler.<ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videoshow/4369344.cms The Times of India]</ref> |
||
In 2010, CBI reiterated the clean chit to Tytler.<ref name="TheHindu_CBI_Cleanchit2010">{{cite news |title=CBI reiterates clean chit to Tytler |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/CBI-reiterates-clean-chit-to-Tytler/article16813661.ece |accessdate=19 January 2019 |publisher=The Hindu |date=10 February 2010 |language=en-IN}}</ref> |
|||
===Denial of Lok Sabha ticket=== |
|||
⚫ | After |
||
=== |
===Denial of Lok Sabha ticket=== |
||
⚫ | After the shoe throwing incident, the Congress party dropped both Tytler and Sajjan Kumar as Congress candidates for the Lok Sabha elections of 2009.<ref>[http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/000200904091817.htm Congress drops Jagdish Tytler, Sajjan Kumar]</ref> Tytler accused the media of victimizing him through a media trial. Tytler blamed the [[Shiromani Akali Dal]] and his "enemies" within the Congress party for scuttling his nomination.<ref>[http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/PoliticsNation/Sheila-shooed-me-out-says-Tytler/articleshow/4387480.cms Sheila shooed me out]</ref> |
||
In February 2010, at a Delhi court before Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Rakesh Pandit, the CBI concluded its arguments stating that the witness’ statements were "false and concocted", CBI supported its closure report that gave a clean chit to Tytler in the riots case. The CBI prosecutor stated that "The version of (witness) Jasbir Singh is absolutely false and concocted. He has made statements with an intention to falsely implicate Tytler."<ref name="TheHindu_CBI_Cleanchit2010">{{cite news |title=CBI reiterates clean chit to Tytler |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/CBI-reiterates-clean-chit-to-Tytler/article16813661.ece |accessdate=19 January 2019 |publisher=The Hindu |date=10 February 2010 |language=en-IN}}</ref> CBI had examined another witness Surender Singh and his family members who stated that the statements of the witness were not correct. CBI had produced a CD before the court to prove that Tytler was not at the location of riot but was present at the residence of Indira Gandhi.<ref name="TheHindu_CBI_Cleanchit2010"/> |
|||
=== 2013 Sessions Court decision === |
=== 2013 Sessions Court decision === |
Revision as of 16:39, 25 January 2019
Jagdish Tytler | |
---|---|
File:Jagdish Tytler.jpg Jagdish Tytler at Manjeet Bullar Cavalry Gold Cup Polo 2010 | |
Minister of State | |
In office 1991–1996 | |
Personal details | |
Born | Gujranwala, Punjab, British India | 11 January 1944
Political party | Indian National Congress |
Residence | New Delhi |
Jagdish Tytler (born 11 January 1944) is an Indian National Congress politician and former Member of Parliament. He has held several government positions, the last being as Minister of State for Overseas Indian Affairs, a post from which he resigned after publication of a report by an official commission of inquiry, known as the Nanavati Commission. The Commission had noted that he "very probably" had a hand in organising attacks on the Sikh community in Delhi after Sikh bodyguards assassinated the Prime Minister, Indira Gandhi, during the 1984 anti-Sikh riots. He has not been charged with any crimes related to those riots.
Due to the controversy concerning his involvement in the riots, the Congress party dropped his name as the candidate for the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.[1]
Early days
Tytler was born on 11 January 1944[2] as Jagdish Kapoor in the Punjabi city of Gujranwala in British India. He was brought up by the educationist James Douglas Tytler, the founder of many public schools including the Delhi Public School and the Summer Fields School.[3] In 2011, his entry into the Jagannath Temple at Puri, which is reserved only for Hindus, caused questions about his religion, to be raised in the Odisha Legislative Assembly.[4] Tytler denied having converted to Christianity, and stated that he had changed his name to show his gratitude towards James Douglas Tytler, who had brought him up.[5]
Active in the Congress' youth organisation and a "disciple" of Sanjay Gandhi,[citation needed] he was first elected to the Lok Sabha in 1980. He served as a Union Minister first in the Civil Aviation department and then in the Labor department. He was re-elected in 1991 and served as the Union Minister of State for Surface Transport. In 2004, he was re-elected to the Lok Sabha.[2]
1984 anti-Sikh riots
Tytler has been accused of involvement in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots in India. The riots had occurred after Sikh bodyguards assassinated Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. Tytler stated that he was present at Teen Murti Bhavan for the funeral ceremony with Gandhi's body and was in mourning at the time when these events occurred at Gurudwara Pulbangash, situated near Azad Market.[6][7] He has not been charged with any crimes related to the 1984 riots.[8]
On April 2004, the Indian National Congress announced Sajjan Kumar, Jagdish Tytler, R. K. Anand and others allegedly involved in the anti-Sikh riots, as its candidates for Indian Parliament elections for constituencies in and around Delhi. Sajjan Kumar, R. K. Anand, Darshan Shastri and H. K. L. Bhagat were accused by several independent commissions of inquiry of being complicit in the riots, including the People's Union for Civil Liberties, the People's Union for Democratic Rights and the Citizen's Justice Committee.[citation needed]
Nanavati Commission
The report of the Nanavati Commission looking into the 1984 anti-Sikh riots said that Tytler "very probably" had a hand in organising the attacks. The then Congress-led Government of India, however, decided not to prosecute him or anyone else named in the report due to lack of concrete evidence.[9]
Tytler, who had been appointed minister of state with independent charge of non-resident affairs, claimed innocence, saying that it was a case of mistaken identity.[citation needed] He said he had not been in the area at the time and that eight earlier commissions of inquiry had exonerated him.[10] On 10 August 2005, he resigned from the Union Council of Ministers, stating that it was his "moral duty" to do so to prevent opposition parties making political capital out of the situation following release of the Nanavati report.[11]
Defamation allegations
In 2004, lawyer H. S. Phoolka filed a case in the Ludhiana court against Tytler, accusing Tytler of defaming him during a television programme in the same year.[12] In 2014, Phoolka declined an "unconditional apology" from Tytler as a proposed settlement.[13] The court framed charges against Tytler in 2015. As of July 2018, no verdict had been reached.[14]
Reopening of the case in 2007
India's Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) closed all cases against Tytler in November 2007 for his alleged criminal conspiracy to engineer riots against Sikhs in the aftermath of Indira Gandhi’s assassination on 31 October 1984. The CBI submitted a report to the Delhi court which stated that no evidence or witness had been found to corroborate the allegations against Tytler of leading murderous mobs during 1984.[15][16] It was also alleged in the court that Tytler, then a member of the Indian Parliament, was complaining to his supporters about relatively "small" number of Sikhs killed in his parliamentary constituency Delhi Sadar, which in his opinion had undermined his position in the ruling Indian National Congress party of India.[17]
In December 2007, an alleged witness, Jasbir Singh, who lives in California, appeared on several television news channels in India, stating that he had not been contacted by the CBI.[18]
On 18 December 2007, the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate of Delhi court, Sanjeev Jain, who had earlier dismissed the case after the CBI's report to his court, ordered the CBI to reopen cases against Tytler relating to the riots.[19]
In December 2008, a two-member CBI team was sent to New York to record the statements of two eyewitnesses, Jasbir Singh and Surinder Singh. The two witnesses have stated that they saw Tytler lead a mob during the riots, but did not want to come to India as they feared for their security.[20]
"Clean chit" by CBI
In March 2009, the CBI filed its final report on investigation into the riots cases and cleared Jagdish Tytler.[6] The BJP which was then in opposition alleged that "such a clean chit ahead of the elections" implied that the CBI had been misused.[21] On 2 April, CBI claimed there was lack of sufficient evidence against Tytler and sought to close the riot case.[22]
On 7 April 2009, the then Home Minister, P. Chidambaram, had a shoe thrown at him by Jarnail Singh, a Sikh journalist, during a press conference in Delhi. Singh, who works at the Hindi daily Dainik Jagran, was dissatisfied with Chidambaram's answer to a question about the "clean chit" given to Tytler.[23]
In 2010, CBI reiterated the clean chit to Tytler.[22]
Denial of Lok Sabha ticket
After the shoe throwing incident, the Congress party dropped both Tytler and Sajjan Kumar as Congress candidates for the Lok Sabha elections of 2009.[24] Tytler accused the media of victimizing him through a media trial. Tytler blamed the Shiromani Akali Dal and his "enemies" within the Congress party for scuttling his nomination.[25]
2013 Sessions Court decision
In April 2013, a Sessions Court rejected the CBI report and ordered investigation against Tytler.[26] Witnesses in the subsequent investigation have included Abhishek Verma[27] and Amitabh Bachchan.[28]
References
- ^ Changing Electoral Politics in Delhi: From Caste to Class, SAGE, p.95, Sanjay Kumar
- ^ a b "Fourteenth Lok Sabha: Members Bioprofile". Lok Sabha Secretariat. Retrieved 17 January 2019.}}
- ^ "Bio-Data of Jagdish Singh Tytler". Press Information Bureau, Government of India. 14 July 2004. Archived from the original on 28 June 2004.
- ^ "Ruckus in Orissa assembly over Tytler's Jagannath Temple visit". NDTV. PTI. 28 March 2011. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
- ^ Jagdish Tytler clarifies, BJD cries riots
- ^ a b "Jagdish Tytler: My own daughter asks if I killed Sikhs". BBC. 19 February 2014. Archived from the original on 8 February 2018. Retrieved 16 January 2019.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|dead-url=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ "No fresh FIR against Congress leader Jagdish Tytler, CBI tells Delhi court". The Indian Express. 9 July 2015. Retrieved 19 January 2019.
- ^ "Clips show Jagdish Tytler confessing about riots: Sikh leader". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 6 February 2018. Retrieved 16 January 2019.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|dead-url=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Indian politicians clash over report on anti-Sikh riots". CBC News. 9 August 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
- ^ "I am innocent: Tytler". Rediff. 8 August 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
- ^ "Jagdish Tytler resigns from Union Cabinet". Outlook. 10 August 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
- ^ "Tytler granted bail in defamation case". India Today. 18 April 2009. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
- ^ "Defamation case: Jagdish Tytler offers apology, H S Phoolka refuses". The Economic Times. 2 July 2014. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
- ^ "Defamation case: Jagdish Tytler withdraws plea in HC". Business Standard. 12 July 2018. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
- ^ [1] Archived 20 December 2007 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Fresh probe into India politician". BBC News. 18 December 2007.
- ^ Re-probe Tytler’s role: Court Archived 7 February 2009 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ BJP to govt: Clear stand on anti-Sikh riots' witness
- ^ 1984 riots: CBI to re-investigate Tytler's role
- ^ Anti Sikh riots witness to give statement to CBI in US
- ^ "CBI files final report in anti-Sikh riot case against Tytler". DNA. PTI. 28 March 2009. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
- ^ a b "CBI reiterates clean chit to Tytler". The Hindu. 10 February 2010. Retrieved 19 January 2019.
- ^ The Times of India
- ^ Congress drops Jagdish Tytler, Sajjan Kumar
- ^ Sheila shooed me out
- ^ Sessions court rejects CBI’s clean chit to Tytler. The Hindu, 10 April 2013
- ^ "Abhishek Verma testimony to be recorded".
- ^ "Amitabh Bachchan witness in Tytler case".
Further reading
- Dougal, Sundeep (10 April 2013). "Jagdish Tytler: A Recap". Outlook. Retrieved 17 January 2019.</ref>
External links
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/4a/Commons-logo.svg/30px-Commons-logo.svg.png)
- antisystemic.org, After Apology, Congress Tries to Scuttle Sikh Massacre Report