User talk:Migsmigss

Migsmigss, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Migsmigss! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clint Bondad

The article Clint Bondad has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Madg2011 (talk) 22:00, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Please check new sources. Clint Bondad is indeed a living person. You may edit and help me find sources, but it is ridiculous to delete the page altogether. We are doing this to help Mr. Bondad become more search-able, of course with the right information. We are doing this pro bono.

We trust you WILL NOT delete the page altogether; rather, you will help us add reliable and valid sources. Thanks.Migsmigss (talk) 04:00, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Clint Bondad has been reverted.
Your edit here to Clint Bondad was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://demigodsonline.blogspot.com/2012/06/who-is-clint-bondad.html, http://demigodsonline.blogspot.com/2012/06/who-is-clint-bondad.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:07, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Clint Bondad. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. And please pay attention to the edit summaries. This is a serious encyclopedia, not a gossip magazine. Packing an article with excessive sources all screaming "OMG, look at Catriona's hot new boyfriend" isn't appropriate. Largoplazo (talk) 09:16, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Clint Bondad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clint Bondad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clint Bondad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 11:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Famousbirthdays.com as a source

Hi Migsmigss . I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for information in a biography article, Clint Bondad . Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 17:37, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33  ~~Swarm~~  {talk}  21:37, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced oder poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Stephanie Del Valle, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  ~~Swarm~~  {talk}  21:40, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. I got this. Duly noted. Will observe propriety from here on in. Have a good day.Migsmigss (talk) 01:54, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catriona Gray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashley Graham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Non-free images

I assume you're new to Wikipedia and don't really know how things work here, so I'm just gonna let you know that you should stop adding File:Catriona Gray with iconic tristar and sun earpiece, in Mak Tumang Swarovski gem-embellished "Mayon" evening number.jpg to articles. You cannot upload whatever images you want to Wikipedia, as most are copyrighted and we don't have the rights to them. You filed this image as your own property, but it's obvious that it was not taken by you, and is set to be deleted on 15 January. Many articles do not have images because we cannot find free images that represent the article's subject, but luckily in the case of Catriona Gray we do. Please stop adding this non-free images. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 11:18, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

No. Already sent out the release email for my image. Thanks. Please be informed before making erroneous/flawed/unreferenced/baseless assumptions. Thanks.Migsmigss (talk) 11:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Catriona+Gray, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Howard the Duck (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Please read before putting forth assumptions without any proper support of references or valid line of reasoning. Re "Music Theory:"

The contention that "Music Theory" isn't a proper noun is uninformed at best, or negative vandalism at worst. It can and does become a proper noun when it is pertained as a specific entity, besides the generalized idea of a "music theory." Thus, in this usage and context, it is a proper noun, as it is a specific subject in this context - pragmatically, syntactically, and semantically. it is a valid proper noun. Do not re-edit with uninformed reason. Thanks.

Migsmigss (talk) 19:25, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 23:53, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Then do not re-edit entries with your bias. Or else I might be forced to also tag you as a Wiki vandal and have you banned. Let us see. Will submit my evidence archives. Thanks.Migsmigss (talk) 00:13, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --{ [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 00:48, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Go ahead. I will answer if it requires me so. Until then, do not edit and re-edit entries with your bias. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 00:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

User talk:Jjj1238

See WP:OWNTALK and stop edit warring there. Jjj1238 may remove any talk threads anytime. Materialscientist (talk) 01:52, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

I have reverted edits on User:Jjj1238's page to show history of this contributor's biased contributions and editing activities, as evidenced by bulletins and complaints of fellow Wikipedia contributors on his page. He has deleted all these complaints in an obvious attempt to un-disclose his biased editing activities.

Migsmigss (talk) 01:54, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

This does not justify your actions. Do not do that again. Materialscientist (talk) 01:55, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. As long as there is no racial discrimination and injustice within Wikipedia, I will try my best. I know your actions are in good faith, and I concur. But I will not stand for anyone who is racist and blatantly exhibits bigotry, like the user/contributor in question. Thanks so much.

I will continue to monitor his contributions, and will do what I deem appropriate from here on in.

Migsmigss (talk) 01:57, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019: Blocked

I have blocked you for two weeks per the report on WP:ANI. This kind of edit is completely unacceptable. So it edit warring to restore it, and so is persistently editing logged out.[1] Edit summaries like this are offensive and ridiculous. The recent obvious stalking and undoing of Jjj1238's edits, giving no reasons in the edit summaries, is worse, and the recent blatant harassment and edit warring on User talk:Jjj1238 is perhaps worst of all. If you resume any of these kinds of disruption after the block, I believe the next block should be indefinite. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 12:26, 3 February 2019 (UTC).