User talk:Soman

see: User talk:Soman/archive1, User talk:Soman/archive2, User talk:Soman/archive3, User talk:Soman/archive4, User talk:Soman/archive5, User talk:Soman/archive6

Nomination of Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DBigXrayᗙ 09:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

• From the editor: Reaching six million articles is great, but we need a moratorium

• News and notes: Six million articles on the English language Wikipedia

• Special report: The limits of volunteerism and the gatekeepers of Team Encarta

• In the media: Turkey's back up, but what's happening with Dot-org and a new visual identity?

• Arbitration report: Three cases at ArbCom

• Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2019

• Gallery: Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, we're all winners

• News from the WMF: Capacity Building: Top 5 Themes from Community Conversations

• Community view: Our most important new article since November 1, 2015

• In focus: Cryptos and bitcoins and blockchains, oh no!

• Recent research: How useful is Wikipedia for novice programmers trying to learn computing concepts?

• From the archives: A decade of The Signpost, 2005-2015

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan: a wikiProject Report

• Humour: Predicting the 6,000,000th article

• Obituary: Remembering Wikipedia contributor Brian Boulton

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of National Patriotic Party (Bangladesh) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Patriotic Party (Bangladesh) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Patriotic Party (Bangladesh) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 06:47, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

DS Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 --DBigXrayᗙ 18:36, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Would you like to elaborate on what issue you have? So far you haven't presented a single coherent argument in the AfD discussion. --Soman (talk) 00:33, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bharatiya_Janata_Yuva_Morcha. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. DBigXrayᗙ 06:17, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Trud, Zemlia i More for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trud, Zemlia i More is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trud, Zemlia i More until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DBigXrayᗙ 06:33, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Golos Pravdy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Golos Pravdy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golos Pravdy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DBigXrayᗙ 06:42, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Priashevshchina for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Priashevshchina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priashevshchina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DBigXrayᗙ 06:59, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Andaman Kural for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andaman Kural is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andaman Kural until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DBigXrayᗙ 11:55, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Muslim_Rashtriya_Manch. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.

This is your final warning. If you attack any other editor at an AfD going forward, I will take your case to WP:ANI or WP:AE seeking for sanctions, since you seem to be incapable of sticking to the content and not attacking others. DBigXrayᗙ 07:52, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Look, I've been along long enough here to detect empty postures. If you have an example of a personal attack, please bring it up in the relevant forum. I stand by the comments I made in the BJYM AfD, which were directed at your actions and behaviour and not your persona or person per se. --Soman (talk) 22:52, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Soman, What does this even mean ? "Look, I've been along long enough here to detect empty postures.

you know very well, which all places, you have strayed from commenting on the content and have attacked the contributors. I have given a few links above.

Saying this again in bold "You are NOT supposed to comment at anyone's actions and behavior at AfD. And neither to his persona or person per se. The only places where this is accepted is User talk page or ANI/AE." You claim you have been long here and yet you seem to be unaware of this.

These are not empty threats and I am going to report this despicable behavior, since it seems that you have trouble understanding this basic WP:CIVILITY requirement to edit on wikipedia. --DBigXrayᗙ 06:09, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, but this is the very definition of hypocrisy. Have a look at this edit summary ("What you did above is nothing but blatant trolling of this AfD."). How come it is ok for you to criticize the behaviour of others in the AfD discussion, but it is not ok for your behaviour to be criticized? --Soman (talk) 16:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

@DBigXray: You accusing another editor of making a personal attack over this[1] is so preposterous one has to wonder what your real motive is....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

he knows what he has said and where. WilliamJE, please see his recent comments on AfDs and then come to a conclusion. I will share the diffs when I will file a formal complaint. DBigXrayᗙ 20:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

DS alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 --DBigXrayᗙ 06:10, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of N. Padmalochanan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article N. Padmalochanan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N. Padmalochanan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 11:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Sammarinese people of the Spanish Civil War has been nominated for discussion

Category:Sammarinese people of the Spanish Civil War, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  17:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)