List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 125: Difference between revisions
Friothaire (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
m →Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 125 U.S.: clean up, typo(s) fixed: newly- → newly (2) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| type = Presidential nomination with Senate [[advice and consent|confirmation]] |
| type = Presidential nomination with Senate [[advice and consent|confirmation]] |
||
| authority = [[Constitution of the United States]], Art. III, §{{nbsp}}1 |
| authority = [[Constitution of the United States]], Art. III, §{{nbsp}}1 |
||
| terms = life tenure, subject to [[ |
| terms = life tenure, subject to [[Federal impeachment in the United States|impeachment]] and removal |
||
| positions = 9 (by statute) |
| positions = 9 (by statute) |
||
| website = {{URL|supremecourt.gov}} |
| website = {{URL|supremecourt.gov}} |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
{{see also|List of United States Supreme Court justices by time in office}} |
{{see also|List of United States Supreme Court justices by time in office}} |
||
{{see also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition}} |
{{see also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition}} |
||
⚫ | |||
The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to [[Congress of the United States|Congress]] to set the number of justices. Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/supreme_court|title=Supreme Court Research Guide |access-date=7 April 2021 |publisher=Georgetown Law Library}}</ref> Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to [[Seventh Circuit Act of 1807|seven]], [[Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837|nine]], [[Tenth Circuit Act of 1863|ten]], and back to [[Judiciary Act of 1869|nine]] justices (always including one chief justice). |
The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to [[Congress of the United States|Congress]] to set the number of justices. Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/supreme_court|title=Supreme Court Research Guide |access-date=7 April 2021 |publisher=Georgetown Law Library}}</ref> Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to [[Seventh Circuit Act of 1807|seven]], [[Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837|nine]], [[Tenth Circuit Act of 1863|ten]], and back to [[Judiciary Act of 1869|nine]] justices (always including one chief justice). |
||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
||
| [[California]] |
| [[California]] |
||
| newly |
| newly created seat |
||
| {{dts|March 10, 1863}}<br />(Acclamation) |
| {{dts|March 10, 1863}}<br />(Acclamation) |
||
|{{dts|May 10, 1863}}<br />–<br />December 1, 1897<br /><small>(Retired)</small> |
|{{dts|May 10, 1863}}<br />–<br />December 1, 1897<br /><small>(Retired)</small> |
||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] |
||
| [[New Jersey]] |
| [[New Jersey]] |
||
| newly |
| newly created seat |
||
| {{dts|March 21, 1870}}<br />(46–9) |
| {{dts|March 21, 1870}}<br />(46–9) |
||
| {{dts|March 23, 1870}}<br />–<br />January 22, 1892<br /><small>(Died)</small> |
| {{dts|March 23, 1870}}<br />–<br />January 22, 1892<br /><small>(Died)</small> |
||
Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
== List of cases in volume 125 U.S. == |
== List of cases in volume 125 U.S. == |
||
⚫ | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! scope="col" style="width: 444px;" | Case Name |
! scope="col" style="width: 444px;" | Case Name |
||
! scope="col" style="width: 95px;" | Page |
! scope="col" style="width: 95px;" | Page and year |
||
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Opinion of the Court |
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Opinion of the Court |
||
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Concurring opinion(s) |
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Concurring opinion(s) |
||
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Dissenting opinion(s) |
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Dissenting opinion(s) |
||
! scope="col" style="width: 133px;" | Lower court |
! scope="col" style="width: 133px;" | Lower court |
||
! scope="col" style="width: |
! scope="col" style="width: 110px;" | Disposition |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Willamette |
| ''Willamette Iron Bridge Company v. Hatch'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92169/willamette-iron-bridge-co-v-hatch 1 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92169/willamette-iron-bridge-co-v-hatch 1 (1888)] |
||
| Bradley |
| Bradley |
||
Line 152: | Line 154: | ||
| reversed |
| reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''New Orleans |
| ''New Orleans Waterworks Company v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Company'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92170/no-waterworks-v-la-sugar-co 18 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92170/no-waterworks-v-la-sugar-co 18 (1888)] |
||
| Gray |
| Gray |
||
Line 160: | Line 162: | ||
| dismissed |
| dismissed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Kreiger v. [[Shelby Railroad|Shelby |
| ''Kreiger v. [[Shelby Railroad|Shelby Railroad Company]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92171/kreiger-v-shelby-r-co 39 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92171/kreiger-v-shelby-r-co 39 (1888)] |
||
| Gray |
| Gray |
||
Line 168: | Line 170: | ||
| dismissed |
| dismissed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Dale |
| ''Dale Tile Manufacturing Company v. Hyatt'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92172/dale-tile-mfg-co-v-hyatt 46 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92172/dale-tile-mfg-co-v-hyatt 46 (1888)] |
||
| Gray |
| Gray |
||
Line 192: | Line 194: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Arthur's |
| ''Arthur's Executors v. Butterfield'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92175/arthurs-executors-v-butterfield 70 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92175/arthurs-executors-v-butterfield 70 (1888)] |
||
| Field |
| Field |
||
Line 224: | Line 226: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Tompkins v. [[Little Rock and Fort Smith Railroad |
| ''Tompkins v. [[Little Rock and Fort Smith Railroad]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92179/tompkins-v-little-rock-fort-smith-r-co 109 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92179/tompkins-v-little-rock-fort-smith-r-co 109 (1888)] |
||
| Waite |
| Waite |
||
Line 230: | Line 232: | ||
| none |
| none |
||
| [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. Ark.]] |
| [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. Ark.]] |
||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Hartranft v. Langfeld'' |
| ''Hartranft v. Langfeld'' |
||
Line 240: | Line 242: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Tilghman v. Proctor |
| ''Tilghman v. Proctor and Gamble'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92181/tilghman-v-proctor 136 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92181/tilghman-v-proctor 136 (1888)] |
||
| Gray |
| Gray |
||
Line 280: | Line 282: | ||
| reversed |
| reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Pembina |
| ''Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining and Milling Company v. [[Pennsylvania]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92186/pembina-consol-silver-mining-milling-co-v-pennsylvania 181 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92186/pembina-consol-silver-mining-milling-co-v-pennsylvania 181 (1888)] |
||
| Field |
| Field |
||
Line 320: | Line 322: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Southern |
| ''Southern Development Company v. Silva'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92191/southern-development-co-v-silva 247 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92191/southern-development-co-v-silva 247 (1888)] |
||
| Lamar |
| Lamar |
||
Line 328: | Line 330: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[Hannibal and St. Joseph Railroad |
| ''[[Hannibal and St. Joseph Railroad]] Company v. Missouri River [[Packet boat|Packet]] Company'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92192/hannibal-st-joseph-r-co-v-missouri-river-packet-co 260 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92192/hannibal-st-joseph-r-co-v-missouri-river-packet-co 260 (1888)] |
||
| Lamar |
| Lamar |
||
Line 336: | Line 338: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''United States v. San Jacinto |
| ''United States v. San Jacinto Tin Company'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92193/united-states-v-san-jacinto-tin-co 273 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92193/united-states-v-san-jacinto-tin-co 273 (1888)] |
||
| Miller |
| Miller |
||
Line 376: | Line 378: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Sage v. Memphis |
| ''Sage v. Memphis and Little Rock Railroad Company'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92198/sage-v-memphis-little-rock-r-co 361 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92198/sage-v-memphis-little-rock-r-co 361 (1888)] |
||
| Harlan |
| Harlan |
||
Line 400: | Line 402: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Washington |
| ''Washington Ice Company v. Webster'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92201/washington-ice-co-v-webster 426 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92201/washington-ice-co-v-webster 426 (1888)] |
||
| Blatchford |
| Blatchford |
||
Line 408: | Line 410: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Yale |
| ''Yale Lock Manufacturing Company v. James'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92202/yale-lock-mfg-co-v-james 447 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92202/yale-lock-mfg-co-v-james 447 (1888)] |
||
| Blatchford |
| Blatchford |
||
Line 416: | Line 418: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Bowman |
| ''Bowman Brothers v. [[Chicago and North Western Transportation Company|Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92203/bowman-v-chicago-northwestern-r-co 465 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92203/bowman-v-chicago-northwestern-r-co 465 (1888)] |
||
| Matthews |
| Matthews |
||
Line 432: | Line 434: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[Western Union |
| ''[[Western Union|Western Union Telephone Company]] v. Attorney General of Massachusetts'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92205/wu-tel-co-v-massachusetts 530 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92205/wu-tel-co-v-massachusetts 530 (1888)] |
||
| Miller |
| Miller |
||
Line 440: | Line 442: | ||
| reversed |
| reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Bucher v. [[Fitchburg Railroad|Cheshire |
| ''Bucher v. [[Fitchburg Railroad|Cheshire Railroad Company]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92206/bucher-v-cheshire-r-co 555 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92206/bucher-v-cheshire-r-co 555 (1888)] |
||
| Miller |
| Miller |
||
Line 448: | Line 450: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Bowerman |
| ''Bowerman Brothers v. Rogers'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92207/bowerman-v-rogers 585 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92207/bowerman-v-rogers 585 (1888)] |
||
| Miller |
| Miller |
||
Line 456: | Line 458: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Union |
| ''Union Trust Company v. Morrison'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92208/union-trust-co-v-morrison 591 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92208/union-trust-co-v-morrison 591 (1888)] |
||
| Bradley |
| Bradley |
||
Line 512: | Line 514: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''St. Louis |
| ''St. Louis, Alton, and Terre Haute Railroad Company v. [[Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati and Indianapolis Railway]] Company'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92214/st-louis-c-railroad-v-cleveland-c-ry 658 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92214/st-louis-c-railroad-v-cleveland-c-ry 658 (1888)] |
||
| Matthews |
| Matthews |
||
Line 552: | Line 554: | ||
| rehearing denied |
| rehearing denied |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''East |
| ''[[East Tennessee, Virginia and Georgia Railway|East Tennessee, Virginia and Georgia Railroad Company]] v. Southern Telegraph Company'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92219/tennessee-c-rd-co-v-southern-tel-co 695 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92219/tennessee-c-rd-co-v-southern-tel-co 695 (1888)] |
||
| Miller |
| Miller |
||
Line 568: | Line 570: | ||
| mandate denied |
| mandate denied |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Lyon v. Perin |
| ''Lyon v. Perin and Gaff Manufacturing Company'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92221/lyon-v-perin-gaff-mfg-co 698 (1888)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/92221/lyon-v-perin-gaff-mfg-co 698 (1888)] |
||
| Lamar |
| Lamar |
||
Line 599: | Line 601: | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:United States Supreme Court cases by volume}} |
{{DEFAULTSORT:United States Supreme Court cases by volume}} |
||
[[Category:Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume| ]] |
|||
[[Category:1888 in United States case law]] |
[[Category:1888 in United States case law]] |
Latest revision as of 13:10, 19 April 2023
Supreme Court of the United States | |
---|---|
![]() | |
![]() | |
38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W | |
Established | March 4, 1789 |
Location | Washington, D.C. |
Coordinates | 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W |
Composition method | Presidential nomination with Senate confirmation |
Authorized by | Constitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1 |
Judge term length | life tenure, subject to impeachment and removal |
Number of positions | 9 (by statute) |
Website | supremecourt |
This article is part of a series on the |
Supreme Court of the United States |
---|
![]() |
The Court |
Current membership |
|
Lists of justices |
|
Court functionaries |
This is a list of cases reported in volume 125 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1888.
Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 125 U.S.
[edit]The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[1] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).
When the cases in volume 125 U.S. were decided the Court comprised the following nine members (Chief Justice Waite died in March 1888, and some of his opinions in the cases below were issued posthumously):
Portrait | Justice | Office | Home State | Succeeded | Date confirmed by the Senate (Vote) |
Tenure on Supreme Court |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Morrison Waite | Chief Justice | Ohio | Salmon P. Chase | January 21, 1874 (63–0) |
March 4, 1874 – March 23, 1888 (Died) |
![]() |
Samuel Freeman Miller | Associate Justice | Iowa | Peter Vivian Daniel | July 16, 1862 (Acclamation) |
July 21, 1862 – October 13, 1890 (Died) |
![]() |
Stephen Johnson Field | Associate Justice | California | newly created seat | March 10, 1863 (Acclamation) |
May 10, 1863 – December 1, 1897 (Retired) |
![]() |
Joseph P. Bradley | Associate Justice | New Jersey | newly created seat | March 21, 1870 (46–9) |
March 23, 1870 – January 22, 1892 (Died) |
![]() |
John Marshall Harlan | Associate Justice | Kentucky | David Davis | November 29, 1877 (Acclamation) |
December 10, 1877 – October 14, 1911 (Died) |
![]() |
Stanley Matthews | Associate Justice | Ohio | Noah Haynes Swayne | May 12, 1881 (24–23) |
May 17, 1881 – March 22, 1889 (Died) |
![]() |
Horace Gray | Associate Justice | Massachusetts | Nathan Clifford | December 20, 1881 (51–5) |
January 9, 1882 – September 15, 1902 (Died) |
![]() |
Samuel Blatchford | Associate Justice | New York | Ward Hunt | March 22, 1882 (Acclamation) |
April 3, 1882 – July 7, 1893 (Died) |
![]() |
Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar | Associate Justice | Mississippi | William Burnham Woods | January 16, 1888 (32–28) |
January 18, 1888 – January 23, 1893 (Died) |
Citation style
[edit]Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.
Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.
- "C.C.D." = United States Circuit Court for the District of . . .
- e.g.,"C.C.D.N.J." = United States Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
- "D." = United States District Court for the District of . . .
- e.g.,"D. Mass." = United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
- "E." = Eastern; "M." = Middle; "N." = Northern; "S." = Southern; "W." = Western
- e.g.,"C.C.S.D.N.Y." = United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York
- e.g.,"M.D. Ala." = United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
- "Ct. Cl." = United States Court of Claims
- The abbreviation of a state's name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that state's judiciary at the time.
- e.g.,"Pa." = Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- e.g.,"Me." = Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
List of cases in volume 125 U.S.
[edit]Case Name | Page and year | Opinion of the Court | Concurring opinion(s) | Dissenting opinion(s) | Lower court | Disposition |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Willamette Iron Bridge Company v. Hatch | 1 (1888) | Bradley | none | none | C.C.D. Or. | reversed |
New Orleans Waterworks Company v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Company | 18 (1888) | Gray | none | none | La. | dismissed |
Kreiger v. Shelby Railroad Company | 39 (1888) | Gray | none | none | Ky. | dismissed |
Dale Tile Manufacturing Company v. Hyatt | 46 (1888) | Gray | none | none | N.Y. | affirmed |
Felix v. Scharnweber | 54 (1888) | Gray | none | none | Ill. | dismissed |
National Bank Redemption v. City of Boston | 60 (1888) | Matthews | none | none | C.C.D. Mass. | affirmed |
Arthur's Executors v. Butterfield | 70 (1888) | Field | none | none | C.C.S.D.N.Y. | affirmed |
Cunningham v. Norton | 77 (1888) | Bradley | none | none | C.C.N.D. Tex. | reversed |
Davison v. Davis | 90 (1888) | Bradley | none | none | C.C.D. Ky. | affirmed |
Weir v. Morden | 98 (1888) | Matthews | none | none | C.C.N.D. Ill. | affirmed |
Tompkins v. Little Rock and Fort Smith Railroad | 109 (1888) | Waite | none | none | C.C.E.D. Ark. | affirmed |
Hartranft v. Langfeld | 128 (1888) | Matthews | none | none | C.C.E.D. Pa. | affirmed |
Tilghman v. Proctor and Gamble | 136 (1888) | Gray | none | none | C.C.S.D. Ohio | reversed |
City of Chicago v. Taylor | 161 (1888) | Harlan | none | none | C.C.N.D. Ill. | affirmed |
Cissel v. Dutch | 171 (1888) | Blatchford | none | none | Sup. Ct. D.C. | reversed |
Potts v. United States | 173 (1888) | Waite | none | none | Ct. Cl. | affirmed |
United States v. Burchard | 176 (1888) | Waite | none | none | Ct. Cl. | reversed |
Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining and Milling Company v. Pennsylvania | 181 (1888) | Field | none | none | Pa. | affirmed |
Maynard v. Hill | 190 (1888) | Field | none | none | Sup. Ct. Terr. Wash. | affirmed |
Hoskin v. Fisher | 217 (1888) | Blatchford | none | none | C.C.N.D. Cal. | reversed |
Friedenstein v. United States | 224 (1888) | Blatchford | none | Field | C.C.S.D.N.Y. | affirmed |
Origet v. United States | 240 (1888) | Blatchford | none | none | C.C.S.D.N.Y. | affirmed |
Southern Development Company v. Silva | 247 (1888) | Lamar | none | none | C.C.N.D. Cal. | affirmed |
Hannibal and St. Joseph Railroad Company v. Missouri River Packet Company | 260 (1888) | Lamar | none | none | Mo. | affirmed |
United States v. San Jacinto Tin Company | 273 (1888) | Miller | Field | none | C.C.D. Cal. | affirmed |
Clement v. Packer | 309 (1888) | Lamar | none | none | C.C.W.D. Pa. | reversed |
Hartranft v. Sheppard | 337 (1888) | Waite | none | none | C.C.E.D. Pa. | affirmed |
Missouri ex rel. Walker v. Walker | 339 (1888) | Waite | none | none | Mo. | affirmed |
Spencer v. Merchant | 345 (1888) | Gray | none | Matthews | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | affirmed |
Sage v. Memphis and Little Rock Railroad Company | 361 (1888) | Harlan | none | none | C.C.E.D. Ark. | reversed |
Wall v. Bissell | 382 (1888) | Gray | none | none | C.C.D. Ind. | affirmed |
Williams v. Conger | 397 (1888) | Bradley | none | none | C.C.N.D. Tex. | affirmed |
Washington Ice Company v. Webster | 426 (1888) | Blatchford | none | none | C.C.D. Me. | affirmed |
Yale Lock Manufacturing Company v. James | 447 (1888) | Blatchford | none | none | C.C.S.D.N.Y. | affirmed |
Bowman Brothers v. Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company | 465 (1888) | Matthews | Field | Harlan | C.C.N.D. Ill. | reversed |
Hartranft v. Oliver | 525 (1888) | Field | none | none | C.C.E.D. Pa. | affirmed |
Western Union Telephone Company v. Attorney General of Massachusetts | 530 (1888) | Miller | none | none | C.C.D. Mass. | reversed |
Bucher v. Cheshire Railroad Company | 555 (1888) | Miller | none | Harlan | C.C.D. Mass. | affirmed |
Bowerman Brothers v. Rogers | 585 (1888) | Miller | none | none | C.C.S.D.N.Y. | affirmed |
Union Trust Company v. Morrison | 591 (1888) | Bradley | none | none | C.C.S.D. Ill. | affirmed |
Dewolf v. Hays | 614 (1888) | Gray | none | none | C.C.D. Cal. | reversed |
Doolan v. Carr | 618 (1888) | Miller | none | Waite | C.C.D. Cal. | reversed |
Johnson v. Christian | 642 (1888) | Blatchford | none | none | C.C.E.D. Ark. | reconsideration granted |
United States v. Baker | 646 (1888) | Blatchford | none | none | Ct. Cl. | affirmed |
Nutt v. United States | 650 (1888) | Matthews | none | none | Ct. Cl. | affirmed |
United States v. Strong | 656 (1888) | Matthews | none | none | Ct. Cl. | affirmed |
St. Louis, Alton, and Terre Haute Railroad Company v. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati and Indianapolis Railway Company | 658 (1888) | Matthews | none | none | C.C.D. Ind. | affirmed |
Dow v. Beidelman | 680 (1888) | Gray | none | none | Ark. | multiple |
Bonahan v. Nebraska | 692 (1888) | Waite | none | none | Neb. | case off docket |
Addington v. Burke | 693 (1888) | Waite | none | none | C.C.N.D. Tex. | dismissed |
City of Shreveport v. Holmes | 694 (1888) | Waite | none | none | C.C.W.D. La. | rehearing denied |
East Tennessee, Virginia and Georgia Railroad Company v. Southern Telegraph Company | 695 (1888) | Miller | none | none | C.C.M.D. Ala. | dismissed |
In re Royall | 696 (1888) | Waite | none | none | Va. | mandate denied |
Lyon v. Perin and Gaff Manufacturing Company | 698 (1888) | Lamar | none | none | C.C.D. Ind. | affirmed |
Notes and references
[edit]- ^ "Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. Retrieved April 7, 2021.
External links
[edit]- [1] Case reports in volume 125 from Library of Congress
- [2] Case reports in volume 125 from Court Listener
- [3] Case reports in volume 125 from the Caselaw Access Project of Harvard Law School
- [4] Case reports in volume 125 from Google Scholar
- [5] Case reports in volume 125 from Justia
- [6] Case reports in volume 125 from Open Jurist
- Website of the United States Supreme Court
- United States Courts website about the Supreme Court
- National Archives, Records of the Supreme Court of the United States
- American Bar Association, How Does the Supreme Court Work?
- The Supreme Court Historical Society