Jump to content

Talk:Bertmainius tingle: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
projects were deleted, see TfD
 
Line 2: Line 2:
{{WikiProject Spiders|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Spiders|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Australia |importance=Low |biota=yes |WA=yes |WA-importance=Low |biota-importance=low|needs-photo=yes}}
{{WikiProject Australia |importance=Low |biota=yes |WA=yes |WA-importance=Low |biota-importance=low|needs-photo=yes}}
{{WikiProject Western Australia South West}}
}}
}}



Latest revision as of 15:44, 22 August 2024

Reference mess

[edit]

I've fixed and completed all the ref. citation in the page, and moved them all into the refs section. Various of them were randomly dumped in "External links" and "Further reading", but zero of them that were are good material for either kind of section. They're all either good sources that should be cited inline, or they're trivial local newspaper cruft that should be removed if they're neither of use as citations nor are anything informative, beyond our article, that we should be directing our readers off-site to go read. A few of the things that were not in "Further reading" and also not cited inline might actually belong there, if they're tertiary sources and we don't need them as citations. I'll leave it to entomology editors to decide which sources are good to use; at least they're valid, complete citations now, not bare URLs that mostly didn't work any more due to linkrot. :-)  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  13:29, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]