Jump to content

Show trial: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ghiznuk (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Altered title. Add: newspaper, authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Abuse of the legal system | #UCB_Category 67/79
 
(292 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Public trial in which the guilt or innocence of the defendant is predetermined}}
{{refimprove|date=February 2013}}
{{Distinguish|Court show|Mock trial|Showtrial (TV series)}}
[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 151-11-29, Volksgerichtshof, Adolf Reichwein.jpg|thumb|[[People's Court (Germany)|People's Court]] in Nazi Germany. Trial of [[Adolf Reichwein]], 1944]]
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2021}}
[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 151-11-29, Volksgerichtshof, Adolf Reichwein.jpg|thumb|250px|[[People's Court (Germany)|People's Court]] trial of [[Adolf Reichwein]], [[Nazi Germany]], 1944<ref>{{cite news |title=German Resistance Memorial Center – Biographie |url=https://www.gdw-berlin.de/en/recess/biographies/index_of_persons/biographie/view-bio/adolf-reichwein/?no_cache=1 |access-date=30 August 2020 |work=gdw-berlin.de}}</ref>]]


A '''show trial''' is a [[public trial]] in which the [[judicial]] authorities have already determined the [[guilt (law)|guilt]] of the [[defendant]]. The actual trial has as its only goal to present the accusation and the verdict to the public as an impressive example and as a warning to other would-be dissidents or transgressors. Show trials tend to be [[retributive justice|retributive]] rather than [[correctional justice]] and also conducted for [[Propaganda|propagandistic]] purposes. The term was first recorded in the 1930s.<ref>OED (2014): [http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/show-trial "show trial".]</ref>
A '''show trial''' is a [[public trial]] in which the [[guilt (law)|guilt]] or innocence of the [[defendant]] has already been determined. The purpose of holding a show trial is to present both accusation and verdict to the public, serving as an example and a [[deterrence (penology)|warning]] to other would-be [[dissident]]s or transgressors.<ref>OED (2014): [https://web.archive.org/web/20140819082630/http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/show-trial "show trial".]</ref>


Show trials tend to be [[retributive justice|retributive]] rather than [[correctional justice|corrective]], and they are also conducted for [[propaganda|propagandistic]] purposes.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/show-trial|title=SHOW TRIAL {{!}} definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary|website=dictionary.cambridge.org|language=en-US|access-date=19 June 2019}}</ref> When aimed at individuals on the basis of [[protected group|protected classes]] or characteristics, show trials are examples of [[political repression|political persecution]]. The term was first recorded in 1928.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/show+trial|title=Definition of SHOW TRIAL|website=www.merriam-webster.com|language=en|access-date=19 June 2019}}</ref>
== China ==
{{Refimprove|date=February 2014}}
Following the formation of the [[People's Republic of China]] in 1949, the [[Communist Party of China]] under [[Mao Zedong]] began a massive [[socioeconomic]] and political campaign called the [[Great Leap Forward]], which lasted circa 1958–1961. During this time, many thousands of people classified as elements of the [[bourgeois]] like wealthy [[landlord]]s were rounded up, given show trials, with some receiving executions.


A similar concept is "[[kangaroo court]]".
Between 1 and 2 million landlords were executed as "counterrevolutionaries" in Communist China.<ref>Busky, Donald F. (2002). ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=Q6b0j1VINWgC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_navlinks_s#v=onepage&q=&f=false Communism in History and Theory]''. Greenwood Publishing Group. p.11.</ref>


== China ==
After the [[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989]], show trials were given to "rioters and counter-revolutionaries" involved in the protests and subsequent military massacre.<ref>[http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1409989?uid=3739696&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21101214130331 Show Trials in China: After Tiananmen Square], Mark Findlay, Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 16, No. 3 (Autumn, 1989), pp. 352-359. Published by Wiley-Blackwell</ref>
After the [[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989]], show trials were given to "rioters and counter-revolutionaries" involved in the protests and the subsequent military massacre.<ref>{{cite journal | url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1409989 | jstor=1409989 | doi=10.2307/1409989 | title=Show Trials in China: After Tiananmen Square | last1=Findlay | first1=Mark | journal=Journal of Law and Society | date=1989 | volume=16 | issue=3 | pages=352–359 }}</ref>


Chinese writer and dissident [[Ma Jian (writer)|Ma Jian]] argued that [[Gu Kailai]], the wife of purged Communist Chinese leader [[Bo Xilai]], was given a show trial in 2012.<ref>[http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/china-s-show-trial-of-the-century-by-ma-jian China’s Show Trial of the Century], [[Ma Jian (writer)|Ma Jian]], [[Project Syndicate]], 2012-08-20</ref>
Chinese [[2010 Nobel Peace Prize|Nobel Peace Prize]] laureate [[Liu Xiaobo]] was given a show trial in 2009.<ref>"[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/8430409.stm Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo jailed for subversion]". BBC News. 25 December 2009.</ref> Chinese writer and dissident [[Ma Jian (writer)|Ma Jian]] argued that [[Gu Kailai]], the wife of purged Communist Chinese leader [[Bo Xilai]], was given a show trial in 2012.<ref>[http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/china-s-show-trial-of-the-century-by-ma-jian China's Show Trial of the Century], [[Ma Jian (writer)|Ma Jian]], [[Project Syndicate]], 20 August 2012</ref>{{better source needed|date=June 2022}}


== Russia ==
== Soviet Union ==
{{main|Moscow trials}}
[[File:Radek's action.jpg|thumb|210px|Prosecutor General [[Andrey Vyshinsky]] (centre) reading the 1937 indictment against [[Karl Radek]] during the 2nd [[Moscow trial]]]]


As early as 1922, [[Vladimir Lenin|Lenin]] advocated staging several "model trials" ("показательный процесс", literally "demonstrative trial", "a process showing an example") in [[Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Soviet Russia]] and [[Soviet Ukraine]].<ref>
===1930s===
{{cite book
{{main|Moscow Trials}}
| last1 = Chase
Show trials were a significant part of [[Joseph Stalin]]'s regime. The [[Moscow Trials]] of the [[Great Purge]] period (1937–38) in the [[Soviet Union]] are characteristic.
| first1 = William
| chapter = 12: Stalin as producer: the Moscow show trials and the construction of mortal threats
| editor1-last = Davies
| editor1-first = Sarah
| editor1-link = Sarah Davies (historian)
| editor2-last = Harris
| editor2-first = James
| title = Stalin: A New History
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=LXo-0FUpZccC
| location = Cambridge
| publisher = Cambridge University Press
| date = 2005
| pages = 226–227
| isbn = 9781139446631
| access-date = 25 September 2018
| quote = Lenin appreciated the power of show trials and was keen to use them [...]. [...] In a February 1922 letter [...] Lenin recommended 'staging a series of model trials' that would administer 'quick and forceful repression' in 'Moscow, Piter [Petrograd], Kharkov and several other important centres'.
}}</ref>


Show trials became common during [[Joseph Stalin]]'s political repressions,{{citation needed|date=April 2021}} such as the [[Moscow Trials]] of the [[Great Purge]] period (1937–38). Such trials paralleled the institution of [[Self-criticism (Marxism–Leninism)|self-criticism]] within [[Communist Party of the Soviet Union|Communist Party]] [[Cadre (politics)|cadre]]s and [[Soviet society]].<ref>
The authorities staged the actual trials meticulously. If defendants refused to "cooperate" — i.e., to admit guilt for their alleged and mostly fabricated crimes — they did not go on public trial, but suffered execution nonetheless. This happened, for example during the prosecution of the so-called "[[Labour Peasant Party]]" (Трудовая Крестьянская Партия), a party invented by the [[NKVD]], which, in particular, assigned the notable economist [[Alexander Chayanov]] to it.
{{cite book
| last1 = Priestland
| first1 = David
| author-link1 = David Priestland
| title = Stalinism and the Politics of Mobilization: Ideas, Power, and Terror in Inter-war Russia
| date = February 2007
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=oJ9pAAAAMAAJ
| location = Oxford
| publisher = Oxford University Press
| publication-date = 2007
| page = 167
| isbn = 9780199245130
| access-date = 4 April 2021
| quote = The characters who embodied these sins then confessed in a 'self-criticism' session. This type of political theatre obviously had a great deal in common with the political show trial and with rituals of 'self-criticism' in the party .
}}
</ref>


Known show trials in Soviet Ukraine include [[Union for the Freedom of Ukraine trial|"Union for the Liberation of Ukraine" trial]] (1930), {{ill|"People's Revolutionary Socialist Party" trial|uk|Справа «Народної революційної соціалістичної партії» (1930)}} (1930),<ref>{{Cite web |last=Shapoval |first=Yurii |title=Народної революційної соціалістичної партії Справа |trans-title=Case of "People's Revolutionary Socialist Party" |url=https://esu.com.ua/article-71165 |access-date=2024-06-02 |website=Енциклопедія Сучасної України |language=uk}}</ref> "{{ill|Ukrainian National Center|uk|Справа «Український національний центр»}}" trial (1931).<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Prystajko |first1=Volodymyr I. |title=Mychajlo Hruševs'kyj: sprava "UNC" i ostanni roky (1931-1934) = Paralleltit. Mykhailo Hrushevsky |last2=Šapoval |first2=Jurij I. |date=1999 |publisher=Krytyka |isbn=978-966-7679-08-8 |location=Kyïv}}</ref>
Some solid public evidence of what really happened during the Moscow Trials came to the West through the [[Dewey Commission]] (1937). After the [[collapse of the Soviet Union]] (1991), more information became available. This discredited the ''[[New York Times]]'' reporter [[Walter Duranty]], who claimed at the time that these trials were actually fair.


== Russia ==
According to declassified Soviet archives, with documents dating to 1937 and 1938, the NKVD arrested more than one and a half million people, of whom 681,692 were executed.<ref>{{cite book | author = Abbott Gleason| title = A companion to Russian history| url = https://books.google.com/?id=JyN0hlKcfTcC&pg=PA373| year = 2009| publisher = Wiley-Blackwell| isbn = 978-1-4051-3560-3| page = 373 }}</ref>
During its full-scale invasion into Ukraine, around 2,000 Ukrainian soldiers were [[Siege of Mariupol#Ukrainian surrender|taken prisoners]] by Russia in Mariupol in May 2022. In 2023 Russia began criminal prosecutions against members of the [[Azov Brigade|Azov Regiment]], on the charges of involvement in a terrorist organization and taking part in action to overthrow the Russia-backed authorities in the Donetsk region. Most of the Ukrainians standing trials in Russia are members of [[Armed Forces of Ukraine|Ukrainian Armed Forces]], which, according to [[Human Rights Watch|HRW]], makes them [[prisoners of war]] with corresponding status and protections per the [[Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War]]. According to HRW and [[Amnesty International]], the charges are [[War crimes in the Russian invasion of Ukraine|war crimes]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Правозахисники: Суд у РФ над азовцями – воєнний злочин – DW – 16.06.2023 |url=https://www.dw.com/uk/pravozahisniki-sud-u-rf-nad-azovcami-voennij-zlocin/a-65935153 |access-date=2024-06-12 |website=dw.com |language=uk}}</ref> and, per HRW, are an excuse to prosecute Ukrainian soldiers for participating in the conflict.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |date=6 July 2023 |title=Russia's Sham Trial of Ukrainian Prisoners of War {{!}} Human Rights Watch |url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/07/06/russias-sham-trial-ukrainian-prisoners-war |access-date=11 January 2024 |language=en |quote="the charges being brought are just a pretext to prosecute Ukrainian soldiers for defending Mariupol from the Russian assault. Prosecuting prisoners of war for participation in the conflict, depriving them of their fair trial rights, and subjecting them to torture or inhuman treatment are all breaches of the Geneva Conventions and war crimes."}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |date=14 June 2023 |title=Captured Ukrainian soldiers face trial in Russia |url=https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-war-prisoners-trial-mariupol-azov-1aecb8fa05a60372c88199e0fe00311d |access-date=6 May 2024 |work=AP News}}</ref> Observers called those prosecution show trials.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-10-01 |title=Russia Charges Ukrainian POWs with Attempting to Seize Power by Force for Opposing Russian Invasion - Diplomacy in Ireland - The European Diplomat |url=https://diplomacyireland.eu/russia-charges-ukrainian-pows-with-attempting-to-seize-power-by-force-for-opposing-russian-invasion/ |access-date=2024-07-12 |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-10-11 |title=Calling the witness for the propaganda |url=https://lens.monash.edu/@politics-society/2023/10/11/1386208?slug=the-persistence-of-russias-ukraine-war-propaganda |access-date=2024-07-12 |website=Monash Lens |language=en-US}}</ref>

===2010s===
In August 2015 Ukrainian director [[Oleg Sentsov]] was sentenced by a Russian military court to 20 years in prison after show trial in Russia’s Rostov-on-Don.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.screendaily.com/news/ukrainian-filmmaker-oleg-sentsov-sentenced-to-20-years/5092022.article|title=Ukrainian filmmaker Oleg Sentsov sentenced to 20 years|publisher=}}</ref>

His co-defendant, the activist and anti-fascist Alexander Kolchenko, was sentenced to 10 years.


== Eastern Europe ==
== Eastern Europe ==
[[File:Proces Pileckiego 1948-2jpg.jpg|thumb|Captain [[Witold Pilecki]], former prisoner at Auschwitz during a show trial made by communist authorities in Poland in 1948]]
[[File:Proces Pileckiego 1948-2.jpg|thumb|Captain [[Witold Pilecki]], former prisoner at [[Auschwitz concentration camp|Auschwitz]] during a show trial conducted by communist authorities in Poland in 1948]]


{{See also|Eastern Bloc politics}}
{{See also|Eastern Bloc politics}}
Following some dissent within ruling [[Communist party|communist parties]] throughout the [[Eastern Bloc]], especially after the 1948 [[Tito–Stalin split]],<ref name="bideleux476">{{Harvnb|Bideleux|Jeffries|2007|p=477}}</ref><ref name="crampton261">{{Harvnb|Crampton|1997|p=261}}</ref> several party [[purge]]s occurred, with several hundred thousand members purged in several countries.<ref name="bideleux476"/><ref name="crampton262">{{Harvnb|Crampton|1997|p=262}}</ref> In addition to rank-and-file member purges, prominent communists were purged, with some subjected to public show trials.<ref name="crampton262"/> These were more likely to be instigated, and sometimes orchestrated, by the [[Kremlin]] or even Stalin himself, as he had done in the earlier Moscow Trials.<ref name="crampton263">{{Harvnb|Crampton|1997|p=263}}</ref>
Following some dissent within ruling [[Communist party|communist parties]] throughout the [[Eastern Bloc]], especially after the 1948 [[Tito–Stalin split]],<ref name="bideleux476">{{Harvnb|Bideleux|Jeffries|2007|p=477}}</ref><ref name="crampton261">{{Harvnb|Crampton|1997|p=261}}</ref> several party [[purge]]s occurred, with several hundred thousand members purged in several countries.<ref name="bideleux476"/><ref name="crampton262">{{Harvnb|Crampton|1997|p=262}}</ref> In addition to rank-and-file member purges, prominent communists were purged, with some subjected to public show trials.<ref name="crampton262"/> These were more likely to be instigated, and sometimes orchestrated, by the [[Kremlin]] or even Stalin himself, as he had done in the earlier Moscow Trials.<ref name="crampton263">{{Harvnb|Crampton|1997|p=263}}</ref>


Such high ranking party show trials included those of [[Koçi Xoxe]] in Albania and [[Traicho Kostov]] in Bulgaria, who were purged and arrested.<ref name="crampton261"/> After Kostov was executed, Bulgarian leaders sent Stalin a telegram thanking him for the help.<ref name="crampton263"/> In Romania, [[Lucreţiu Pătrăşcanu]], [[Ana Pauker]] and [[Vasile Luca]] were arrested, with Pătrăşcanu being executed.<ref name="crampton262"/>
Such high-ranking party show trials included those of [[Koçi Xoxe]] in Albania and [[Traicho Kostov]] in Bulgaria, who were purged and arrested.<ref name="crampton261"/> After Kostov was executed, Bulgarian leaders sent Stalin a telegram thanking him for the help.<ref name="crampton263"/> In Romania, [[Lucrețiu Pătrășcanu]], [[Ana Pauker]] and [[Vasile Luca]] were arrested, with Pătrășcanu being executed.<ref name="crampton262"/> The Soviets generally directed show trial methods throughout the Eastern Bloc, including a procedure in which confessions and evidence from leading witnesses could be extracted by any means, including threatening to torture the witnesses' wives and children.<ref name="crampton264">{{Harvnb|Crampton|1997|p=264}}</ref> The higher-ranking the party member, generally the more harsh the torture that was inflicted upon him.<ref name="crampton264" /> For the show trial of Hungarian Interior Minister [[János Kádár]], who one year earlier had attempted to force a confession of Rajk in his show trial, regarding "Vladimir" the questioner of Kádár:<ref name="crampton264" />

{{Blockquote|text=Vladimir had but one argument: blows. They had begun to beat Kádár. They had smeared his body with mercury to prevent his pores from breathing. He had been writhing on the floor when a newcomer had arrived. The newcomer was Vladimir's father, Mihály Farkas. Kádár was raised from the ground. Vladimir stepped close. Two henchmen pried Kádár's teeth apart, and the colonel, negligently, as if this were the most natural thing in the world, urinated into his mouth.|author=|title=|source=}}

The evidence was often not just non-existent but absurd, such as Hungarian [[George Paloczi-Horváth]]'s party interrogators claiming "We knew all the time—we have it here in writing—that you met professor Szentgyörgyi not in [[Istanbul]], but in [[Constantinople]]."<ref name="crampton265">{{Harvnb|Crampton|1997|p=265}}</ref> In another case, the Hungarian [[ÁVH]] secret police also condemned another party member as a Nazi accomplice with a document that had been previously displayed in a glass cabinet at the Institute of the Working Class Movement as an example of a [[Gestapo]] forgery.<ref name="crampton265" /> The trials themselves were "shows", with each participant having to learn a script and conduct repeated rehearsals before the performance.<ref name="crampton265" /> In the [[Slánský trial]] in [[Czechoslovak Socialist Republic|Czechoslovakia]], when the judge skipped one of the scripted questions, the better-rehearsed Slánský answered the one which should have been asked.<ref name="crampton265" />

===Yugoslavia===
In 1946, [[Draža Mihailović]] and a number of other prominent figures of the [[Chetnik movement]] during World War II [[Trial of Mihailović et al.|were tried]] for high treason and war crimes committed during WWII. The trial opened in the presence of about 60 foreign journalists. Mihailović and ten others (two in absentia) were sentenced to death by a firing squad; the others were convicted of penalties ranging from 18 months to 20 years in prison. In 2015, a Serbian court invalidated Mihailović's conviction. The court held that it had been a [[Communist Party of Yugoslavia|Communist]] political show trial that was controlled by the government. The court concluded that Mihailović had not received a fair trial. Mihailović was, therefore, fully rehabilitated.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.b92.net/eng/news/society.php?yyyy=2015&mm=05&dd=14&nav_id=94116|title=Court rehabilitates WW2-era Chetnik leader Draza Mihailovic - English - on B92.net|website=B92.net|date=14 May 2015 |access-date=4 January 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/serbia-rehabilitates-wwii-chetnik-leader-mihailovic|title=Serbia Rehabilitates WWII Chetnik Leader Mihailovic|website=www.balkaninsight.com|date=14 May 2015|access-date=4 January 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://inserbia.info/today/2015/05/draza-mihailovic-rehabilitated/|title="Draza Mihailovic rehabilitated", May 14, 2015, InSerbia.|date=18 May 2015}}</ref>

During 1946–1949, several well-publicized show trials were held in the [[People's Republic of Slovenia]]. First was the [[Nagode Trial]] in which 32 non-communist intellectuals were tried as spies, three of them sentenced to death. Second was a series of so-called [[Dachau trials (Slovenia)|Dachau trials]] in which 37 members of the Communist Party were sentenced, 15 of them to death.


===Hungary===
===Hungary===
Stalin's NKVD emissary coordinated with Hungarian General Secretary [[Mátyás Rákosi]] and his [[ÁVH]] head the way the show trial of Hungarian Foreign Minister [[László Rajk]] should go, and he was later executed.<ref name="crampton263"/> The Rajk trials led Moscow to warn Czechoslovakia's parties that enemy agents had penetrated high into party ranks, and when a puzzled [[Rudolf Slánský]] and [[Klement Gottwald]] inquired what they could do, Stalin's NKVD agents arrived to help prepare subsequent trials.
Stalin's [[NKVD]] emissary coordinated with Hungarian General Secretary [[Mátyás Rákosi]] and his [[ÁVH]] head the way the show trial of Hungarian Minister of Interior [[László Rajk]] should go, and he was later executed.<ref name="crampton263"/>


===Czechoslovakia===
===Czechoslovakia===
The [[Rajk trial]]s in Hungary led Moscow to warn Czechoslovakia's parties that enemy agents had penetrated even high into party ranks, and when a puzzled [[Rudolf Slánský]] and [[Klement Gottwald]] inquired what they could do, Stalin's NKVD agents arrived to help prepare subsequent trials.
The [[Communist Party of Czechoslovakia|Czechoslovak Communist party]] subsequently arrested Slánský himself, [[Vladimír Clementis]], Ladislav Novomeský and [[Gustáv Husák]] (Clementis was later executed).<ref name="crampton262"/> Slánský and eleven others were convicted together of being "Trotskyist-zionist-titoist-bourgeois-nationalist traitors" in one series of show trials, after which they were executed and their ashes were mixed with material being used to fill roads on the outskirts of Prague.<ref name="crampton262"/> By the time of the Slánský trials, the Kremlin had been arguing that Israel, like Yugoslavia, had bitten the Soviet hand that had fed it, and thus the trials took an overtly [[anti-Semitic]] tone, with eleven of the fourteen defendants tried with Slánský being Jewish.<ref name="crampton265">{{Harvnb|Crampton|1997|p=265}}</ref>


First, these trials focused on people outside the [[Communist Party of Czechoslovakia|Czechoslovak Communist party]]. General [[Heliodor Píka]] was arrested without a warrant in early May 1948 and accused of [[espionage]] and [[high treason]],<ref>{{Cite web|last=Hauner|first=Milan (Winter 2001–2002)|date=20 July 2011|title=Crime and Punishment in Prague: The Strange Case of Karel Vaš and Gen. Heliodor Píka|url=http://www.worldpolicy.newschool.edu/journal/articles/wpj01-4/Hauner.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110720012035/http://www.worldpolicy.newschool.edu/journal/articles/wpj01-4/Hauner.pdf|archive-date=20 July 2011|access-date=25 June 2020}}</ref> damaging the interests of the Czechoslovak Republic and the Soviet Union, and undermining the ability of the state to defend itself, Píka was not allowed to present a defence, and no witnesses were called. He was sentenced to death and hanged. During the [[Prague Spring]] of 1968, Píka's case was reopened at the request of Milan Píka (son of Heliodor) and the elder Píka's lawyer, and a military tribunal declared Heliodor Píka innocent of all charges.<ref>{{Cite web|date=19 June 2009|title=Remembering General Heliodor Píka, first victim of the communist show trials|url=https://english.radio.cz/remembering-general-heliodor-pika-first-victim-communist-show-trials-8583622|access-date=25 June 2020|website=Radio Prague International|language=en}}</ref>
The Soviets generally directed show trial methods throughout the Eastern Bloc, including a procedure in which confessions and evidence from leading witnesses could be extracted by any means, including threatening to torture the witnesses’ wives and children.<ref name="crampton264">{{Harvnb|Crampton|1997|p=264}}</ref> The higher ranking the party member, generally the more harsh the torture that was inflicted upon him.<ref name="crampton264"/> For the show trial of Hungarian Interior Minister [[János Kádár]], who one year earlier had attempted to force a confession of Rajk in his show trial, regarding "Vladimir" the questioner of Kádár:<ref name="crampton264"/>{{cquote|Vladimir had but one argument: blows. They had begun to beat Kádár. They had smeared his body with mercury to prevent his pores from breathing. He had been writhing on the floor when a newcomer had arrived. The newcomer was Vladimir’s father, Mihály Farkas. Kádár was raised from the ground. Vladimir stepped close. Two henchmen pried Kádár’s teeth apart, and the colonel, negligently, as if this were the most natural thing in the world, urinated into his mouth.}}


[[Milada Horáková]], a [[Czechoslovakia|Czech]] [[politician]] focused on social issues and women's rights, who was jailed during the [[German occupation of Czechoslovakia|German occupation]] for her political activity,<ref>{{Cite web|title=Milada Horáková – Radio Praha|url=http://old.radio.cz/cz/clanek/92617|access-date=25 June 2020|website=old.radio.cz|archive-date=27 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200627160522/http://old.radio.cz/cz/clanek/92617|url-status=dead}}</ref> was accused of leading a conspiracy to commit treason and espionage at the behest of the United States, Great Britain, France and Yugoslavia. Evidence of the alleged conspiracy included Horáková's presence at a meeting of political figures from the National Socialist, [[Czechoslovak Social Democratic Party|Social Democrat]] and [[Czechoslovak People's Party|People's]] parties, in September 1948, held to discuss their response to the new political situation in Czechoslovakia. She was also accused of maintaining contacts with Czechoslovak political figures in exile in the West. The trial of Horáková and twelve of her colleagues began on 31 May 1950<ref>{{Cite web|title=Dr. Horáková Milada a spol. – Ústav pro studium totalitních režimů|url=https://www.ustrcr.cz/uvod/skupina-vyzkumu/dr-horakova-milada-a-spol/|access-date=25 June 2020|website=www.ustrcr.cz}}</ref> and the State's prosecutors were led by Dr. [[Josef Urválek]] and included [[Ludmila Brožová-Polednová]]. The trial proceedings were carefully orchestrated with confessions of guilt secured from the accused, though a recording of the event, discovered in 2005, revealed Horáková's defence of her political ideals.<ref>{{Cite web|date=6 April 2007|title=Young director to bring story of Milada Horakova to silver screen|url=https://english.radio.cz/young-director-bring-story-milada-horakova-silver-screen-8609282|access-date=25 June 2020|website=Radio Prague International|language=en}}</ref> Horáková was sentenced to death, along with three co-defendants (Jan Buchal, Oldřich Pecl, and [[Záviš Kalandra]]), on 8 June 1950. Many prominent figures in the West, notably [[Albert Einstein]], [[Winston Churchill]] and [[Eleanor Roosevelt]], petitioned for her life, but the sentences were confirmed. She was executed by hanging in Prague's [[Pankrác Prison]] on 27 June 1950.
The evidence was often not just non-existent but absurd, with Hungarian [[George Paloczi-Horváth]]’s party interrogators delightedly exclaiming "We knew all the time—we have it here in writing—that you met professor Szentgyörgyi not in [[Istanbul]], but in [[Constantinople]]."<ref name="crampton265"/> In another case, the Hungarian [[ÁVH]] secret police also condemned another party member as a Nazi accomplice with a document that had actually been previously displayed in glass cabinet of the Institute of the Working Class Movement as an example of a Gestapo forgery.<ref name="crampton265"/> The trials themselves were "shows", with each participant having to learn a script and conduct repeated rehearsals before the performance.<ref name="crampton265"/> In the Slánský trial, when the judge skipped one of the scripted questions, the better-rehearsed Slánský answered the one which should have been asked.<ref name="crampton265"/>


The trials then turned to the communist party itself ([[Slánský trial]]). In November 1952 [[Rudolf Slánský]] and 13 other high-ranking Communist bureaucrats (Bedřich Geminder, Ludvík Frejka, Josef Frank, [[Vladimír Clementis]], [[Bedřich Reicin]], Karel Šváb, [[Rudolf Margolius]], [[Otto Šling]], [[Otto Katz|André Simone]], [[Artur London]], Vavro Hajdů and Evžen Löbl), 10 of whom were Jews, were arrested and charged with being [[Titoism|Titoists]] and [[Zionists]], official [[USSR]] rhetoric having turned against [[Zionism]]. Party rhetoric asserted that Slánský was spying as part of an international western capitalist conspiracy to undermine socialism and that punishing him would avenge the Nazi murders of Czech communists [[Jan Šverma]] and [[Julius Fučík (journalist)|Julius Fučík]] during World War II. The trial of the 14 national leaders began on 20 November 1952, in the Senate of the State Court, with the prosecutor being [[Josef Urválek]]. It lasted eight days. It was notable for its strong [[anti-Semitic]] overtones.{{Citation needed|date=December 2020}} All were found guilty, with three being sentenced to life imprisonment while the rest were sentenced to death. Slánský was hanged at [[Pankrác Prison]] on 3 December 1952. His body was cremated and the ashes were scattered on an icy road outside of Prague.
===Romania===
{{main|Trial of Nicolae and Elena Ceaușescu}}
As the end of the [[Romanian Revolution of 1989|1989 Romanian Revolution]] neared, [[Romanian Communist Party|First Secretary of the Communist Party]] [[Nicolae Ceaușescu]] and his wife [[Elena Ceaușescu|Elena]] were condemned to death and [[Execution by firing squad|shot dead by a firing squad]] after a [[Stalinism|Stalinist-style]] trial in a [[kangaroo court]].<ref name=impreuna>[http://adevarul.ro/sfarsitul_ceausestilor/Nicolae_si_Elena_Ceausescu-_-Impreuna_am_luptat-sa_murim_impreuna_0_173983015.html Nicolae și Elena Ceaușescu: „Împreună am luptat, să murim împreună!“<!-- Titlu generat de un robot -->] Adevărul, 19 December 2009.</ref>


== Western Europe ==
== Western Europe ==
*The [[Cadaver Trial]] was a posthumous trial over Catholic Pope Formosus held in 897.
*The [[Dreyfus affair]] was a show trial in France in 1894, where a Jewish captain, [[Alfred Dreyfus]], was accused and convicted of spying for the [[German Empire]] and exiled.

=== Nazi Germany ===
=== Nazi Germany ===


Between 1933 and 1945, the Nazi government established a large number of [[Sondergericht]]e that were frequently used to prosecute those hostile to the regime. The [[People's Court (Germany)]] was a [[kangaroo court]] established in 1934 to handle political crimes after several of the defendants at the [[Reichstag fire]] Trial were acquitted. Between 1933 and 1945, an estimated 12,000 Germans were killed on the orders of the "special courts" set up by the [[Nazi regime]].<ref>Peter Hoffmann "The History of the German Resistance, 1933-1945"p.xiii</ref>
Between 1933 and 1945, [[Nazi Germany]] established a large number of [[Sondergericht]]e that were frequently used to prosecute those hostile to the regime. The [[People's Court (Germany)|People's Court]] was a [[kangaroo court]] established in 1934 to handle political crimes, after several of the defendants at the [[Reichstag fire]] Trial were acquitted. Between 1933 and 1945, an estimated 12,000 Germans were killed on the orders of the "special courts" set up by the [[Nazi regime]].<ref>Peter Hoffmann "The History of the German Resistance, 1933–1945"p.xiii</ref>
==Iran==

In the current [[Iran]]ian regime there are no juries in [[Islamic Revolutionary Court]]s – trial by peers only exists in some special courts – with verdicts set before the trial; have been several occasions of trials being labeled show for their proceeding.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-02-07 |title=Family denounces 'show trial' of German held in Iran |url=https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20220207-family-denounces-show-trial-of-german-held-in-iran |access-date=2024-08-01 |website=France 24 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2018-11-14 |title=Two people executed for financial crimes in Iran |url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2018/11/iran-two-people-executed-for-corruption-after-unfair-tv-show-trial/ |access-date=2024-08-01 |website=Amnesty International |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last= |first= |title=Families Of Flight PS752 Victims Criticize Iran's Judiciary For 'Show Trial' |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/iran-flight-752-families-show-trial/32367311.html |access-date=2024-08-01 |work=RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Morello |first=Carol |date=2023-04-10 |title=Verdicts often set before trials take place in Iran's revolutionary courts |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/irans-revolutionary-courts-are-criticized-as-swift-and-unjust/2015/05/29/2d203708-0555-11e5-8bda-c7b4e9a8f7ac_story.html |access-date=2024-08-01 |newspaper=Washington Post |language=en-US |issn=0190-8286}}</ref>

== Africa ==

The prosecution of [[Laurent Gbagbo]] at the [[International Penal Court]], which started in 2016, 5 years after Gbagbo was arrested, can also be considered as a showtrial. It is broadcast live on television and on the internet and is widely followed and commented by many people not only from Côte d'Ivoire but also from other African countries and France. It includes many « guest speakers » as key witnesses, people who were close from the Gbagbo regime and occupied key positions in the army or the administration. Predicted to last at least three years, given the huge numbers of testimonies from various witnesses, the process is largely seen as a political one, a « punishment » from the former colonial power, as an example and warning to African heads of State who talk of « breaking free » from the perceived economic domination of the former colonial powers.



==See also==
==See also==
{{Portal|Criminal justice}}
{{Portal|Law}}
{{div col|colwidth=22em}}
{{colbegin|3}}
* 1301 trial of [[Bernard Saisset]], Paris.
* 1415 trial of [[Jan Hus]], Konstanz
* 1415 trial of [[Jan Hus]], Konstanz
* 1431 [[trial of Joan of Arc|trial of]] [[Joan of Arc]], Rouen
* 1431 [[trial of Joan of Arc]], Rouen
* 1649 [[Charles I of England#Trial|trial of Charles I of England]] (by the [[High Court of Justice for the trial of Charles I]])
* 1649 [[Charles I of England#Trial|trial of Charles I of England]]
* 1792 [[trial of Louis XVI]] during the French Revolution
* 1792 [[trial of Louis XVI]] during the French Revolution
* 1894 [[Trial of the Thirty]], Paris
* 1894 [[Trial of the Thirty]], Paris
* 1948 trial and execution of [[Shafiq Ades]], Iraq
* 1897 Trial and execution of [[Haymarket riots]] anarchist leaders, Chicago
* 1949 show trial and execution of [[László Rajk]], under Hungary's communist regime
* 1927 Trial and execution of [[Sacco and Vanzetti]], Massachusetts
* 1946 [[Trial of Mihailović et al]] and execution, Belgrade
* 1948 trial and execution of [[Shafiq Ades]], Iraq
* 1953 [[Stalinist show trial of the Kraków Curia]], Poland
* 1953 [[Stalinist show trial of the Kraków Curia]], Poland
* 1963 trial of premier [[Abdul Karim Qassim]] of Iraq
* 1981 trial of the [[Gang of Four]] in China
* 1981 trial of the [[Gang of Four]] in China
* 1984 televised trial and execution of [[Execution of Al-Sadek Hamed Al-Shuwehdy|Al-Sadek Hamed Al-Shuwehdy]] in Libya
* 1984 televised trial and [[execution of Al-Sadek Hamed Al-Shuwehdy]] in Libya
* 1989 [[Trial of Nicolae and Elena Ceaușescu]] and execution
* [[2009 Iran poll protests trial]] of over 140 defendants
* [[2009 Iran poll protests trial]] of over 140 defendants
* The [[trial of Saddam Hussein]]
* 2009 (June 4) trial of Euna Lee and Laura Ling in North Korea
* 2010 trial of [[Mikhail Khodorkovsky]], Russia
* 2013 trial of [[Jang Song-thaek]] in North Korea
* [[Eastern Bloc politics]]
* [[Eastern Bloc politics]]
* [[Kangaroo court]]: a sham legal proceeding
* [[NKVD troika]], sentencing by extrajudicial commission
* [[NKVD troika]], sentencing by extrajudicial commission
* [[Political trial]], a criminal trial with political implications.
* [[Political trial]], a criminal trial with political implications.
* [[Posthumous trial]]
* [[Posthumous trial]]
* [[Victor's justice]], prosecution of the defeated party's acts in a conflict by the victorious party, typically in public tribunal
* [[Witch-hunt]], hunting down people of a certain race/trait/profession/political conviction for doing or saying something sinful
* [[Witch-hunt]], hunting down people of a certain race/trait/profession/political conviction for doing or saying something sinful
{{colend}}
{{div col end}}


==Notes==
==Notes==
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist}}


==References==
==References==
{{refbegin|2}}
{{refbegin}}
*{{Citation|last1=Bideleux|first1=Robert|last2=Jeffries|first2=Ian|title=A History of Eastern Europe: Crisis and Change|publisher=Routledge|year=2007|isbn=0-415-36626-7}}
*{{Citation|last1=Bideleux|first1=Robert|last2=Jeffries|first2=Ian|title=A History of Eastern Europe: Crisis and Change|publisher=Routledge|year=2007|isbn=978-0-415-36626-7}}
*{{Citation|last=Crampton|first=R. J.|title=Eastern Europe in the twentieth century and after|publisher=Routledge|year=1997|isbn=0-415-16422-2}}
*{{Citation|last=Crampton|first=R. J.|title=Eastern Europe in the twentieth century and after|publisher=Routledge|year=1997|isbn=0-415-16422-2}}
* Hodos, George H. ''Show Trials: Stalinist Purges in Eastern Europe, 1948–1954''. New York, Westport (Conn.), and London: Praeger, 1987.
* Hodos, George H. ''Show Trials: Stalinist Purges in Eastern Europe, 1948–1954''. New York, Westport (Conn.), and London: Praeger, 1987.
* [http://www.showtrials.eu/index.php Showtrials Website] of the [[European Union]]
* [http://www.showtrials.eu/index.php Showtrials Website] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181118174404/http://www.showtrials.eu/index.php |date=18 November 2018 }} of the [[European Union]]
* Balázs Szalontai, Show trials. In: Ruud van Dijk et al. (eds.), ''Encyclopedia of the Cold War'' (London and New York: Routledge, 2008), pp. 783–786. Downloadable at [https://www.academia.edu/6129700/Show_Trials academia.edu]
* Balázs Szalontai, Show trials. In: Ruud van Dijk et al. (eds.), ''Encyclopedia of the Cold War'' (London and New York: Routledge, 2008), pp. 783–786. Downloadable at [https://www.academia.edu/6129700/Show_Trials academia.edu]
{{refend}}
{{refend}}


==External links==
==External links==
{{commonscatinline|Show trials}}
{{commons category-inline|Show trials}}


{{Authority control}}
{{Miscarriage of Justice}}
{{Miscarriage of Justice}}
{{Authority control}}


[[Category:Informal legal terms]]
[[Category:1920s neologisms]]
[[Category:Informal legal terminology]]
[[Category:Types of trials]]
[[Category:Types of trials]]
[[Category:Propaganda techniques]]
[[Category:Propaganda techniques]]

Latest revision as of 05:18, 10 September 2024

People's Court trial of Adolf Reichwein, Nazi Germany, 1944[1]

A show trial is a public trial in which the guilt or innocence of the defendant has already been determined. The purpose of holding a show trial is to present both accusation and verdict to the public, serving as an example and a warning to other would-be dissidents or transgressors.[2]

Show trials tend to be retributive rather than corrective, and they are also conducted for propagandistic purposes.[3] When aimed at individuals on the basis of protected classes or characteristics, show trials are examples of political persecution. The term was first recorded in 1928.[4]

A similar concept is "kangaroo court".

China

[edit]

After the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, show trials were given to "rioters and counter-revolutionaries" involved in the protests and the subsequent military massacre.[5]

Chinese Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo was given a show trial in 2009.[6] Chinese writer and dissident Ma Jian argued that Gu Kailai, the wife of purged Communist Chinese leader Bo Xilai, was given a show trial in 2012.[7][better source needed]

Soviet Union

[edit]
Prosecutor General Andrey Vyshinsky (centre) reading the 1937 indictment against Karl Radek during the 2nd Moscow trial

As early as 1922, Lenin advocated staging several "model trials" ("показательный процесс", literally "demonstrative trial", "a process showing an example") in Soviet Russia and Soviet Ukraine.[8]

Show trials became common during Joseph Stalin's political repressions,[citation needed] such as the Moscow Trials of the Great Purge period (1937–38). Such trials paralleled the institution of self-criticism within Communist Party cadres and Soviet society.[9]

Known show trials in Soviet Ukraine include "Union for the Liberation of Ukraine" trial (1930), "People's Revolutionary Socialist Party" trial [uk] (1930),[10] "Ukrainian National Center [uk]" trial (1931).[11]

Russland

[edit]

During its full-scale invasion into Ukraine, around 2,000 Ukrainian soldiers were taken prisoners by Russia in Mariupol in May 2022. In 2023 Russia began criminal prosecutions against members of the Azov Regiment, on the charges of involvement in a terrorist organization and taking part in action to overthrow the Russia-backed authorities in the Donetsk region. Most of the Ukrainians standing trials in Russia are members of Ukrainian Armed Forces, which, according to HRW, makes them prisoners of war with corresponding status and protections per the Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War. According to HRW and Amnesty International, the charges are war crimes[12] and, per HRW, are an excuse to prosecute Ukrainian soldiers for participating in the conflict.[13][14] Observers called those prosecution show trials.[15][16]

Eastern Europe

[edit]
Captain Witold Pilecki, former prisoner at Auschwitz during a show trial conducted by communist authorities in Poland in 1948

Following some dissent within ruling communist parties throughout the Eastern Bloc, especially after the 1948 Tito–Stalin split,[17][18] several party purges occurred, with several hundred thousand members purged in several countries.[17][19] In addition to rank-and-file member purges, prominent communists were purged, with some subjected to public show trials.[19] These were more likely to be instigated, and sometimes orchestrated, by the Kremlin or even Stalin himself, as he had done in the earlier Moscow Trials.[20]

Such high-ranking party show trials included those of Koçi Xoxe in Albania and Traicho Kostov in Bulgaria, who were purged and arrested.[18] After Kostov was executed, Bulgarian leaders sent Stalin a telegram thanking him for the help.[20] In Romania, Lucrețiu Pătrășcanu, Ana Pauker and Vasile Luca were arrested, with Pătrășcanu being executed.[19] The Soviets generally directed show trial methods throughout the Eastern Bloc, including a procedure in which confessions and evidence from leading witnesses could be extracted by any means, including threatening to torture the witnesses' wives and children.[21] The higher-ranking the party member, generally the more harsh the torture that was inflicted upon him.[21] For the show trial of Hungarian Interior Minister János Kádár, who one year earlier had attempted to force a confession of Rajk in his show trial, regarding "Vladimir" the questioner of Kádár:[21]

Vladimir had but one argument: blows. They had begun to beat Kádár. They had smeared his body with mercury to prevent his pores from breathing. He had been writhing on the floor when a newcomer had arrived. The newcomer was Vladimir's father, Mihály Farkas. Kádár was raised from the ground. Vladimir stepped close. Two henchmen pried Kádár's teeth apart, and the colonel, negligently, as if this were the most natural thing in the world, urinated into his mouth.

The evidence was often not just non-existent but absurd, such as Hungarian George Paloczi-Horváth's party interrogators claiming "We knew all the time—we have it here in writing—that you met professor Szentgyörgyi not in Istanbul, but in Constantinople."[22] In another case, the Hungarian ÁVH secret police also condemned another party member as a Nazi accomplice with a document that had been previously displayed in a glass cabinet at the Institute of the Working Class Movement as an example of a Gestapo forgery.[22] The trials themselves were "shows", with each participant having to learn a script and conduct repeated rehearsals before the performance.[22] In the Slánský trial in Czechoslovakia, when the judge skipped one of the scripted questions, the better-rehearsed Slánský answered the one which should have been asked.[22]

Yugoslavia

[edit]

In 1946, Draža Mihailović and a number of other prominent figures of the Chetnik movement during World War II were tried for high treason and war crimes committed during WWII. The trial opened in the presence of about 60 foreign journalists. Mihailović and ten others (two in absentia) were sentenced to death by a firing squad; the others were convicted of penalties ranging from 18 months to 20 years in prison. In 2015, a Serbian court invalidated Mihailović's conviction. The court held that it had been a Communist political show trial that was controlled by the government. The court concluded that Mihailović had not received a fair trial. Mihailović was, therefore, fully rehabilitated.[23][24][25]

During 1946–1949, several well-publicized show trials were held in the People's Republic of Slovenia. First was the Nagode Trial in which 32 non-communist intellectuals were tried as spies, three of them sentenced to death. Second was a series of so-called Dachau trials in which 37 members of the Communist Party were sentenced, 15 of them to death.

Ungarn

[edit]

Stalin's NKVD emissary coordinated with Hungarian General Secretary Mátyás Rákosi and his ÁVH head the way the show trial of Hungarian Minister of Interior László Rajk should go, and he was later executed.[20]

Czechoslovakia

[edit]

The Rajk trials in Hungary led Moscow to warn Czechoslovakia's parties that enemy agents had penetrated even high into party ranks, and when a puzzled Rudolf Slánský and Klement Gottwald inquired what they could do, Stalin's NKVD agents arrived to help prepare subsequent trials.

First, these trials focused on people outside the Czechoslovak Communist party. General Heliodor Píka was arrested without a warrant in early May 1948 and accused of espionage and high treason,[26] damaging the interests of the Czechoslovak Republic and the Soviet Union, and undermining the ability of the state to defend itself, Píka was not allowed to present a defence, and no witnesses were called. He was sentenced to death and hanged. During the Prague Spring of 1968, Píka's case was reopened at the request of Milan Píka (son of Heliodor) and the elder Píka's lawyer, and a military tribunal declared Heliodor Píka innocent of all charges.[27]

Milada Horáková, a Czech politician focused on social issues and women's rights, who was jailed during the German occupation for her political activity,[28] was accused of leading a conspiracy to commit treason and espionage at the behest of the United States, Great Britain, France and Yugoslavia. Evidence of the alleged conspiracy included Horáková's presence at a meeting of political figures from the National Socialist, Social Democrat and People's parties, in September 1948, held to discuss their response to the new political situation in Czechoslovakia. She was also accused of maintaining contacts with Czechoslovak political figures in exile in the West. The trial of Horáková and twelve of her colleagues began on 31 May 1950[29] and the State's prosecutors were led by Dr. Josef Urválek and included Ludmila Brožová-Polednová. The trial proceedings were carefully orchestrated with confessions of guilt secured from the accused, though a recording of the event, discovered in 2005, revealed Horáková's defence of her political ideals.[30] Horáková was sentenced to death, along with three co-defendants (Jan Buchal, Oldřich Pecl, and Záviš Kalandra), on 8 June 1950. Many prominent figures in the West, notably Albert Einstein, Winston Churchill and Eleanor Roosevelt, petitioned for her life, but the sentences were confirmed. She was executed by hanging in Prague's Pankrác Prison on 27 June 1950.

The trials then turned to the communist party itself (Slánský trial). In November 1952 Rudolf Slánský and 13 other high-ranking Communist bureaucrats (Bedřich Geminder, Ludvík Frejka, Josef Frank, Vladimír Clementis, Bedřich Reicin, Karel Šváb, Rudolf Margolius, Otto Šling, André Simone, Artur London, Vavro Hajdů and Evžen Löbl), 10 of whom were Jews, were arrested and charged with being Titoists and Zionists, official USSR rhetoric having turned against Zionism. Party rhetoric asserted that Slánský was spying as part of an international western capitalist conspiracy to undermine socialism and that punishing him would avenge the Nazi murders of Czech communists Jan Šverma and Julius Fučík during World War II. The trial of the 14 national leaders began on 20 November 1952, in the Senate of the State Court, with the prosecutor being Josef Urválek. It lasted eight days. It was notable for its strong anti-Semitic overtones.[citation needed] All were found guilty, with three being sentenced to life imprisonment while the rest were sentenced to death. Slánský was hanged at Pankrác Prison on 3 December 1952. His body was cremated and the ashes were scattered on an icy road outside of Prague.

Western Europe

[edit]

Nazi Germany

[edit]

Between 1933 and 1945, Nazi Germany established a large number of Sondergerichte that were frequently used to prosecute those hostile to the regime. The People's Court was a kangaroo court established in 1934 to handle political crimes, after several of the defendants at the Reichstag fire Trial were acquitted. Between 1933 and 1945, an estimated 12,000 Germans were killed on the orders of the "special courts" set up by the Nazi regime.[31]

Iran

[edit]

In the current Iranian regime there are no juries in Islamic Revolutionary Courts – trial by peers only exists in some special courts – with verdicts set before the trial; have been several occasions of trials being labeled show for their proceeding.[32][33][34][35]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ "German Resistance Memorial Center – Biographie". gdw-berlin.de. Retrieved 30 August 2020.
  2. ^ OED (2014): "show trial".
  3. ^ "SHOW TRIAL | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary". dictionary.cambridge.org. Retrieved 19 June 2019.
  4. ^ "Definition of SHOW TRIAL". www.merriam-webster.com. Retrieved 19 June 2019.
  5. ^ Findlay, Mark (1989). "Show Trials in China: After Tiananmen Square". Journal of Law and Society. 16 (3): 352–359. doi:10.2307/1409989. JSTOR 1409989.
  6. ^ "Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo jailed for subversion". BBC News. 25 December 2009.
  7. ^ China's Show Trial of the Century, Ma Jian, Project Syndicate, 20 August 2012
  8. ^ Chase, William (2005). "12: Stalin as producer: the Moscow show trials and the construction of mortal threats". In Davies, Sarah; Harris, James (eds.). Stalin: A New History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 226–227. ISBN 9781139446631. Retrieved 25 September 2018. Lenin appreciated the power of show trials and was keen to use them [...]. [...] In a February 1922 letter [...] Lenin recommended 'staging a series of model trials' that would administer 'quick and forceful repression' in 'Moscow, Piter [Petrograd], Kharkov and several other important centres'.
  9. ^ Priestland, David (February 2007). Stalinism and the Politics of Mobilization: Ideas, Power, and Terror in Inter-war Russia. Oxford: Oxford University Press (published 2007). p. 167. ISBN 9780199245130. Retrieved 4 April 2021. The characters who embodied these sins then confessed in a 'self-criticism' session. This type of political theatre obviously had a great deal in common with the political show trial and with rituals of 'self-criticism' in the party .
  10. ^ Shapoval, Yurii. "Народної революційної соціалістичної партії Справа" [Case of "People's Revolutionary Socialist Party"]. Енциклопедія Сучасної України (in Ukrainian). Retrieved 2 June 2024.
  11. ^ Prystajko, Volodymyr I.; Šapoval, Jurij I. (1999). Mychajlo Hruševs'kyj: sprava "UNC" i ostanni roky (1931-1934) = Paralleltit. Mykhailo Hrushevsky. Kyïv: Krytyka. ISBN 978-966-7679-08-8.
  12. ^ "Правозахисники: Суд у РФ над азовцями – воєнний злочин – DW – 16.06.2023". dw.com (in Ukrainian). Retrieved 12 June 2024.
  13. ^ "Russia's Sham Trial of Ukrainian Prisoners of War | Human Rights Watch". 6 July 2023. Retrieved 11 January 2024. the charges being brought are just a pretext to prosecute Ukrainian soldiers for defending Mariupol from the Russian assault. Prosecuting prisoners of war for participation in the conflict, depriving them of their fair trial rights, and subjecting them to torture or inhuman treatment are all breaches of the Geneva Conventions and war crimes.
  14. ^ "Captured Ukrainian soldiers face trial in Russia". AP News. 14 June 2023. Retrieved 6 May 2024.
  15. ^ "Russia Charges Ukrainian POWs with Attempting to Seize Power by Force for Opposing Russian Invasion - Diplomacy in Ireland - The European Diplomat". 1 October 2023. Retrieved 12 July 2024.
  16. ^ "Calling the witness for the propaganda". Monash Lens. 11 October 2023. Retrieved 12 July 2024.
  17. ^ a b Bideleux & Jeffries 2007, p. 477
  18. ^ a b Crampton 1997, p. 261
  19. ^ a b c Crampton 1997, p. 262
  20. ^ a b c Crampton 1997, p. 263
  21. ^ a b c Crampton 1997, p. 264
  22. ^ a b c d Crampton 1997, p. 265
  23. ^ "Court rehabilitates WW2-era Chetnik leader Draza Mihailovic - English - on B92.net". B92.net. 14 May 2015. Retrieved 4 January 2019.
  24. ^ "Serbia Rehabilitates WWII Chetnik Leader Mihailovic". www.balkaninsight.com. 14 May 2015. Retrieved 4 January 2019.
  25. ^ ""Draza Mihailovic rehabilitated", May 14, 2015, InSerbia". 18 May 2015.
  26. ^ Hauner, Milan (Winter 2001–2002) (20 July 2011). "Crime and Punishment in Prague: The Strange Case of Karel Vaš and Gen. Heliodor Píka" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 July 2011. Retrieved 25 June 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  27. ^ "Remembering General Heliodor Píka, first victim of the communist show trials". Radio Prague International. 19 June 2009. Retrieved 25 June 2020.
  28. ^ "Milada Horáková – Radio Praha". old.radio.cz. Archived from the original on 27 June 2020. Retrieved 25 June 2020.
  29. ^ "Dr. Horáková Milada a spol. – Ústav pro studium totalitních režimů". www.ustrcr.cz. Retrieved 25 June 2020.
  30. ^ "Young director to bring story of Milada Horakova to silver screen". Radio Prague International. 6 April 2007. Retrieved 25 June 2020.
  31. ^ Peter Hoffmann "The History of the German Resistance, 1933–1945"p.xiii
  32. ^ "Family denounces 'show trial' of German held in Iran". France 24. 7 February 2022. Retrieved 1 August 2024.
  33. ^ "Two people executed for financial crimes in Iran". Amnesty International. 14 November 2018. Retrieved 1 August 2024.
  34. ^ "Families Of Flight PS752 Victims Criticize Iran's Judiciary For 'Show Trial'". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Retrieved 1 August 2024.
  35. ^ Morello, Carol (10 April 2023). "Verdicts often set before trials take place in Iran's revolutionary courts". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 1 August 2024.

References

[edit]
  • Bideleux, Robert; Jeffries, Ian (2007), A History of Eastern Europe: Crisis and Change, Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-36626-7
  • Crampton, R. J. (1997), Eastern Europe in the twentieth century and after, Routledge, ISBN 0-415-16422-2
  • Hodos, George H. Show Trials: Stalinist Purges in Eastern Europe, 1948–1954. New York, Westport (Conn.), and London: Praeger, 1987.
  • Showtrials Website Archived 18 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine of the European Union
  • Balázs Szalontai, Show trials. In: Ruud van Dijk et al. (eds.), Encyclopedia of the Cold War (London and New York: Routledge, 2008), pp. 783–786. Downloadable at academia.edu
[edit]

Media related to Show trials at Wikimedia Commons