User talk:Therapyisgood: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Lepricavark (talk | contribs) →AFD nominations: Reply |
Reverted 1 edit by Lepricavark (talk): Stay off my talk page. |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Please pace your nominations at AFD and do not do any mass-nominations, especially on articles on similar subjects. It puts an undue strain on editors who want to do their due diligence and look for sources that might make the difference between an article being kept or deleted. It only takes seconds to nominate a page for deletion but editors can spend hours searching for reliable sources. There is no urgent need to delete articles on non-notable subjects so please pace out your nominations so you don't overwhelm the system. Many thanks for your contributions! <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 04:37, 28 January 2023 (UTC) |
Please pace your nominations at AFD and do not do any mass-nominations, especially on articles on similar subjects. It puts an undue strain on editors who want to do their due diligence and look for sources that might make the difference between an article being kept or deleted. It only takes seconds to nominate a page for deletion but editors can spend hours searching for reliable sources. There is no urgent need to delete articles on non-notable subjects so please pace out your nominations so you don't overwhelm the system. Many thanks for your contributions! <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 04:37, 28 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
:{{ping|Liz}} if I recall correctly there was an RFC somewhere that on this very topic. Did that end up limiting the number of AFD noms a user could submit at once, or not? If not, I have not done anything against policy. I do not plan on nominating less for AFD in the future if there's no policy against it. [[User:Therapyisgood|Therapyisgood]] ([[User talk:Therapyisgood#top|talk]]) 05:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC) |
:{{ping|Liz}} if I recall correctly there was an RFC somewhere that on this very topic. Did that end up limiting the number of AFD noms a user could submit at once, or not? If not, I have not done anything against policy. I do not plan on nominating less for AFD in the future if there's no policy against it. [[User:Therapyisgood|Therapyisgood]] ([[User talk:Therapyisgood#top|talk]]) 05:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
::If you don't slow your roll on these dubious AfD noms, I can assure you that you will end up at ANI sooner or later. And when you do, the uncollaborative spirit conveyed in the above comment will do you no favors. Liz gave several good reasons why you shouldn't do mass nominations, and you didn't acknowledge a single one of those reasons. Similarly, you simply hauled me up at deletion review without the courtesy contact that is suggested in the instructions. And then there was the revert w/o response of Beanie's comment. Thus far, you are batting .000 at working well with others. Like a bull in a china shop, you have rushed into a content area that you clearly do not understand and created a mess for others to clean up. And as we are trying to clean it up, you are boldly proclaiming that we have no right to prevent you from making more messes tomorrow. All things considered, Liz's message was quite charitable, and I suggest you take it to heart. [[User:Lepricavark|L<small>EPRICAVARK</small>]] ([[User talk:Lepricavark#top|<small>talk</small>]]) 06:54, 28 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:56, 28 January 2023
| This is Therapyisgood's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2 |
AFD nominations
Hello, Therapyisgood,
Please pace your nominations at AFD and do not do any mass-nominations, especially on articles on similar subjects. It puts an undue strain on editors who want to do their due diligence and look for sources that might make the difference between an article being kept or deleted. It only takes seconds to nominate a page for deletion but editors can spend hours searching for reliable sources. There is no urgent need to delete articles on non-notable subjects so please pace out your nominations so you don't overwhelm the system. Many thanks for your contributions! Liz Read! Talk! 04:37, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Liz: if I recall correctly there was an RFC somewhere that on this very topic. Did that end up limiting the number of AFD noms a user could submit at once, or not? If not, I have not done anything against policy. I do not plan on nominating less for AFD in the future if there's no policy against it. Therapyisgood (talk) 05:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC)