Jump to content

User talk:😂: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bdj (talk | contribs)
trolling?
😂 (talk | contribs)
Yes Jeff, you are a troll. Happy that someone finally said it? Please stay off my talkpage, as I do not wish to talk to you.
Line 144: Line 144:


Sorry to bother you earlier with kind of request for [[WP:3O]]. Can you take a look at the debate going on there? I guess I am running out of time there. Thanks for the attention you have given me already. Cheers. [[User:Aditya Kabir|Aditya Kabir]] 06:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you earlier with kind of request for [[WP:3O]]. Can you take a look at the debate going on there? I guess I am running out of time there. Thanks for the attention you have given me already. Cheers. [[User:Aditya Kabir|Aditya Kabir]] 06:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

== Allison Stokke ==

Do not early close good faith DRVs. There is a major issue with how that is closed, as it was closed improperly, and a DRV is necessary to sort that out. If you have an opinion on the matter, feel free to express it in the discussion. --[[User:Badlydrawnjeff|badlydrawnjeff]] <small>[[User_talk:Badlydrawnjeff|talk]]</small> 13:24, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
:Trolling? --[[User:Badlydrawnjeff|badlydrawnjeff]] <small>[[User_talk:Badlydrawnjeff|talk]]</small> 13:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:29, 9 June 2007

WELCOME!
Hello, and welcome to my talk page. I will be glad to discuss anything with you. Click here to start a new discussion. Have a great day.


NOTE
I have been deleting many images tagged for deletion. If it was a fair use image, before requesting that I restore it, please make sure that you had an extensive fair use description of why it should be allowed, or be prepared to give one, as fair use images cannot be used under blanket reasons such as "it's from a movie" or "it's the cover of a CD." This being said, I wont restore 90% of the images I deleted. Thanks.

Also, and I cannot stress this enough, if you do ask me to look at an image I deleted, please provide me with the image name. A quick look at my logs will show you that I cannot possibly remember all the images I deleted. If you can't provide me with that, then there's not much I can do for you, as I don't have the time to dig through my logs or the page histories to find it. Thanks again.



Archive
Archives
  1. December 2005 - May 2006
  2. June 2006 - November 2006
  3. December 2006 - May 2007
  4. June 2007 - CURRENT

Just to let you know I've restored the above image and added a fair use rationale. At WP:COMICS we're going through adding the rationales as best we can, if the rationale isn't sufficient let me know what else needs adding. Probably should have come here first and talked it through, sorry, just figured WP:IAR, WP:BOLD. Hope that's okay. Steve block Talk 17:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting "Image:Chpsonic.jpg"

Why did you delete "Image:Chpsonic.jpg"?

Why did you delete this image? I know it had a fair use rationale and a source mentioned. --Maitch 20:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

image rights

Hello,

I am trying to get an image for a webpage. However, most of the images of that person are not public domain. I am currently talking to someone who owns a lot of images of that person but she is hesitant to turn images over to the public domain for instance. What is the most restrictive license that is acceptable to wikipedia?

--florkle 01:00, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Khinchin's theorem

Hello, can you, please, restore Khinchin's theorem, which you have (speedily) deleted? I have explained at the talk page, which you have also deleted, that while the title was likely to be wrong, the statement may well have been worth keeping, since it was completely correct. At the very least, we should have asked a probabilist for an opinion. You may also be interested to know that recently concern was expressed on WT:WPM that Probability theory is lacking in coverage, and deleting articles is not the best way to solve the problem! Incidentally, the content of the article (or the talk page) is not accessible even through my contributions! Thanks in advance. Arcfrk 02:16, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So what is 2^demon?

Geeky joke, I know, but I think your username is unique. Will (talk) 19:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You know, it could be i ;) Will (talk) 19:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation

I submitted a request for mediation, but I'm afraid I added it manually by mistake; is it too late to stop it damaging the bot? Sorry for this. Alexrexpvt 20:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Mediation Commitee Nomination

I understand that my nomination request is denied, but what does 'I am envoking my right to private reasoning on this vote (see this). For Committee members, see our private mailing list. Daniel 06:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)' mean, could i be told? -- (Cocoaguy ここがいい contribstalk) 01:31, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It means that my justification for voting oppose was not recorded on-wiki. I explained by reasoning for voting oppose, and my reason for keeping the vote private, to my fellow members via our private mailing list. Daniel 05:05, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot

Um, deleting the fair use tags from what had been properly tagged images and then saying they had no license seems unfair. -N 01:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Drug Dealer Card Game

Why did you delete this article?

Removal of Pokémon image templates

I must say that I am disappointed with the way this TfD discussion was run. I'm almost certain that no attempt at notifying the appropriate project page about the discussion was made. Now, you're removing copyright tags from those images; those images are now in worse shape than they were in before you deleted all the templates. I must say I am suprised to have seen this happen. I think the only appropriate course to take right now is to restore those templates and have a do-over TfD, and this time to let the relevant people in on the discussion (by posting on the project's talk page or noticeboard about the discussion). --Brandon Dilbeck 02:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We weren't even notified, period. The only notice we got was not more than one hour ago, when User:Amarkov reported that all the image tags had been deleted. -Jeske (v^_^v) 02:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St. Catherine's College deleted images

Dear ^demon,

I recently posted images provided by St. Catherine's College, Oxford, but they were deleted a few days ago. I emailed the College to obtain permission and they have authorized their use, provided the College is credited. A copy of this correspondence is attached. I am not sure which Wikipedia license category is most appropriate, but since you were the admin who deleted them, I thought perhaps you would be the best person to ask! Please let me know if there is something else I need to do to meet Wikipedia's requirements. I appreciate your diligence regarding copyright.

My communication with the College regarding use of these images is attached below.


Best regards,

Bbacambridge

_______________________

Subject: [CATZ-RT #2294] Fwd: St. Catz online images Sender: <[email protected]> RT-Ticket: CATZ-RT #2294 From: [email protected] Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 08:50:55 +0100

Hello again Brad,

Thank you for your email. As in my previous email the College is happy for you to use images taken from our main website www.stcatz.ox.ac.uk subject to a request that in an acknowledgements section, or something similar - perhaps the Licensing section each image-page - a phrase to the effect of "images of St Catherine's used with permission of the College" is included.

The exceptions - that is images that you cannot use - are a minority of photographs for which the original photographer has retained copyright: these are indicated by having 'copyright Townend' included in the relevant images as a text strip.

(NB: none of the images posted contain this text strip)

Best regards,

Jamie Keats

I.T. Manager St. Catherine's College Manor Road Oxford OX1 3UJ

facsimile: 01865 271 768 telephone: 01865 281 579

64.38.3.218 unblocked

64.38.3.218 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) resolves to advance.express.tc which indicates that it is an ISP proxy. Since you're a relatively new administrator, please remember to perform WHOIS, Reverse DNS lookup and DNSBL queries before blocking IP addresses in future. Thanks. --  Netsnipe  ►  13:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your block on User:Reaper7

User talk:Nwwaew#I have a final warning might be of interest to you. Cheers! Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 15:14, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another Request

Since you were so helpful with the last request, I've come with another one. Image:Eskimo pie box.jpg was another Smithsonian image I uploaded a few moths ago. Again, I had fair use info with it. I think what happened is that WP depreciated the {{Smithsonian}} tag and all those images picked up AFD's. I actually have the copyright info for this one. Can you restore it, please? I'll fix it within 24 hours. Thanks! --Knulclunk 23:14, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you earlier with kind of request for WP:3O. Can you take a look at the debate going on there? I guess I am running out of time there. Thanks for the attention you have given me already. Cheers. Aditya Kabir 06:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]