Watts Up With That?: Difference between revisions
thats better: rm: copyvio |
and rm self-desc, as before: too inaccurate |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/article7043753.ece Richard Dawkins' pro-am clash in the boffins' blogosphere]</ref> In 2010, ''[[The Times]]'' online blog named WUWT one of the top 30 science blogs,<ref>{{cite web | url=http://timesonline.typepad.com/science/2010/02/best-science-blogs.html | title=Eureka's Top 30 Science Blogs}}</ref> and in 2008 it won best science blog in [[The Weblog Awards (Bloggies)]].<ref>{{cite web | url=http://2008.weblogawards.org/ |title=The 2008 Weblog Awards Winners}}</ref> <ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kevin-grandia/will-the-real-science-ple_b_157370.html | title=Will the Real Science Please Stand Up? -- Global Warming Denier Site Set to be Crowned the "Best Science Blog"}}</ref> |
[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/article7043753.ece Richard Dawkins' pro-am clash in the boffins' blogosphere]</ref> In 2010, ''[[The Times]]'' online blog named WUWT one of the top 30 science blogs,<ref>{{cite web | url=http://timesonline.typepad.com/science/2010/02/best-science-blogs.html | title=Eureka's Top 30 Science Blogs}}</ref> and in 2008 it won best science blog in [[The Weblog Awards (Bloggies)]].<ref>{{cite web | url=http://2008.weblogawards.org/ |title=The 2008 Weblog Awards Winners}}</ref> <ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kevin-grandia/will-the-real-science-ple_b_157370.html | title=Will the Real Science Please Stand Up? -- Global Warming Denier Site Set to be Crowned the "Best Science Blog"}}</ref> |
||
[[Matt Ridley]], writing in ''[[The Spectator]]'', said of WUWT that is has "...metamorphosed from a gathering place for lonely nutters to a three-million-hits-per-month online newspaper on climate full of fascinating articles by physicists, geologists, economists and statisticians".<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.spectator.co.uk/essays/all/5749853/part_3/the-global-warming-guerrillas.thtml | title=The global warming guerrillas}}</ref> |
[[Matt Ridley]], writing in ''[[The Spectator]]'', said of WUWT that is has "...metamorphosed from a gathering place for lonely nutters to a three-million-hits-per-month online newspaper on climate full of fascinating articles by physicists, geologists, economists and statisticians".<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.spectator.co.uk/essays/all/5749853/part_3/the-global-warming-guerrillas.thtml | title=The global warming guerrillas}}</ref> |
||
The blog describes itself as "News and commentary on puzzling things in life, nature, science, weather, climate change, technology, and recent news by Anthony Watts". |
|||
====Involvement in "Climategate" controversy==== |
====Involvement in "Climategate" controversy==== |
||
Revision as of 08:37, 18 March 2010
 | The neutrality of this article is disputed. |
Type of site | blog |
|---|---|
| Created by | Anthony Watts |
| URL | http://wattsupwiththat.com |
Watts Up With That (WUWT for short) is a group blog set up in 2006 by former broadcast weather presenter Anthony Watts which concentrates on the global warming controversy from a skeptical perspective. The blog was reported by the Sunday Times in 2010 as receiving "more than two million readers each month".[1] In 2010, The Times online blog named WUWT one of the top 30 science blogs,[2] and in 2008 it won best science blog in The Weblog Awards (Bloggies).[3] [4] Matt Ridley, writing in The Spectator, said of WUWT that is has "...metamorphosed from a gathering place for lonely nutters to a three-million-hits-per-month online newspaper on climate full of fascinating articles by physicists, geologists, economists and statisticians".[5]
Involvement in "Climategate" controversy
![[icon]](/wiki/File:Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg){kind=small} | This section needs expansion with: examples and additional citations. You can help by adding to it. (March 2010) |
In late 2009, an archive containing emails and other documents from the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia were Illegally released to the public. The Guardian reported that WUWT was one of three blogs "sent links to the cache of CRU leaked material, via anonymous servers, on the same day, Tuesday 17 November".[6]
In an interview with the Financial Times, Watts reported that his blog had become "busier than ever" after the incident and that traffic to the site had tripled. According to the same article, the total number of hits on the site since its launch had topped 37 million.[7][8]
James Delingpole, writing in the Daily Telegraph blog, claimed that the name "Climategate" was first coined by the WUWT contributor "Bulldust".[9]
Criticism
| This section needs expansion with: examples and additional citations. You can help by adding to it. (March 2010) |
In The Globe And Mail Jeet Heer wrote of WUWT and the blog Climate Audit (which takes a similarly sceptical view on the subject of man made global warming): "The sites' rising popularity, and the growing influence they appear to wield in shaping public debate, is deeply worrying to the scientific community".[10]
The decision to nominate WUWT as best science blog was criticised by Kevin Grandia in The Huffington Post in 2009.[11]
References
- ^ Richard Dawkins' pro-am clash in the boffins' blogosphere
- ^ "Eureka's Top 30 Science Blogs".
- ^ "The 2008 Weblog Awards Winners".
- ^ "Will the Real Science Please Stand Up? -- Global Warming Denier Site Set to be Crowned the "Best Science Blog"".
- ^ "The global warming guerrillas".
- ^ Detectives question climate change scientist over email leaks
- ^ "E-mail leaks that clouded climate issue".
- ^ "Politicising and scare tactics cloud the issue".
- ^ "Climategate: how the 'greatest scientific scandal of our generation' got its name".
- ^ Jeet Heer (19 February 2010). "Climategate's guerrilla warriors: pesky foes or careful watchdogs?". The Globe and Mail.
- ^ Will the Real Science Please Stand Up? -- Global Warming Denier Site Set to be Crowned the "Best Science Blog"