Jump to content

User talk:SwisterTwister: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 38: Line 38:
Hi, SwisterTwister,<br />
Hi, SwisterTwister,<br />
First of all, please don't let a dispute with another editor (or any number of other things) put you off continuing with the Wikipedia project. From [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=SwisterTwister your contributions] my opinion is that, though it's been a bit of a bumpy ride, I would urge you to stay around and keep contributing.<br />
First of all, please don't let a dispute with another editor (or any number of other things) put you off continuing with the Wikipedia project. From [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=SwisterTwister your contributions] my opinion is that, though it's been a bit of a bumpy ride, I would urge you to stay around and keep contributing.<br />
All that said, please read [[Wikipedia:Right to vanish]], which outlines what steps you can take if you really want to have your [[WP:USERPAGE|user]] and [[WP:TALKPAGE|talk]] pages deleted. (Please note that this specifies that you must be a "user in good standing" to completely vanish.)<br />
All that said, please read [[Wikipedia:Right to vanish]], which outlines what steps you can take if you really want to have your [[WP:USERPAGE|user]] and [[WP:TALKPAGE|talk]] pages deleted.<br />
In summary: please stay and contribute; if you really want out then please read Wikipedia:Right to vanish <br />
In summary: please stay and contribute, but if you really want out please follow [[WP:VANISH]]<br />
--[[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 10:13, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
--[[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 10:13, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:30, 29 May 2010

Welcome!

Hello, SwisterTwister, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.

ϢereSpielChequers 08:09, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

She is still engaged to Michael Cameron, there are absolutely no sources anywhere to suggest otherwise, other than people making up rumors/lying (she's never said anything of the kind on her website, like that one person claimed). —Preceding unsigned comment added by River4ever (talkcontribs) 11:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know it isn't on her website because I am a regular visiter, she has said no such thing. What is your source that she isn't with him anymore? If you have one then why don't you post it? I've done absolutely nothing wrong, only print the truth. No fights are happening either. My post keeps been removed for no valid reason. Oh well, I guess you will all be proven wrong when they do get married. —Preceding unsigned comment added by River4ever (talkcontribs) 08:28, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of people have long engagements, it's really not unusual. Bev explained a while ago that they put the wedding plans on hold because of her career schedule. She's been inactive on her website for a while now but there is no reason to believe they have broken up. As stated, it's been mentioned they're possibly getting married this summer. And, I doubt she would have a pic of the 2 of them as her display picture on her facebook profile if they were no longer together. I'm not picking fights, just clearing things up, printing the truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by River4ever (talkcontribs) 21:35, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I settle for it, even though I don't agree with your logic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by River4ever (talkcontribs) 11:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking Sandbox

Hi, I did not understand your message. What is blanking the sandbox? I am brand new to Wikipedia. Does it refer to the header at the top of the sandbox in the edit screen? I accidentally deleted the first time, and it instantly reappeared, so I assumed it was somehow protected. But if "blanking" means something else, let me know. Tnx for help. EricDiesel (talk) 14:37, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: sandbox

Sorry about that - I wanted to test my code before adding it to an article, and forgot to delete it. RobC (talk) 08:18, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit?

I have no idea what you are talking about. Can you please be more specific? ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 01:06, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes... I looked at the history and I see a recent anon. edit in which a nonnotable cover of the song was listed, with no source provided. Were you that anon. editor? If so, or if not, a cover of a song, with no source to show why that cover was notable, is just cruft, which adds nothing to an understanding of the song or its importance. Ok? ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 01:28, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About your request in the 29 May 2010 AfDs

Hi, SwisterTwister,
First of all, please don't let a dispute with another editor (or any number of other things) put you off continuing with the Wikipedia project. From your contributions my opinion is that, though it's been a bit of a bumpy ride, I would urge you to stay around and keep contributing.
All that said, please read Wikipedia:Right to vanish, which outlines what steps you can take if you really want to have your user and talk pages deleted.
In summary: please stay and contribute; if you really want out then please read Wikipedia:Right to vanish
--Shirt58 (talk) 10:13, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]