Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Fitzgerald (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Dennisthe2 (talk | contribs) |
ScottyBerg (talk | contribs) →Kate Fitzgerald: cmt |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* '''Keep''' Clearly notable, but the article can be improved. [[User:Night of the Big Wind|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Night of the Big Wind</font></font>]] [[User talk:Night of the Big Wind|<font color="maroon"><sub><i>talk</i></sub></font>]] 21:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC) |
* '''Keep''' Clearly notable, but the article can be improved. [[User:Night of the Big Wind|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Night of the Big Wind</font></font>]] [[User talk:Night of the Big Wind|<font color="maroon"><sub><i>talk</i></sub></font>]] 21:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
:*Would you mind explaining why you think that this does not fall under [[WP:BLP1E]]? --[[User:Guillaume2303|Guillaume2303]] ([[User talk:Guillaume2303|talk]]) 22:16, 3 December 2011 (UTC) |
:*Would you mind explaining why you think that this does not fall under [[WP:BLP1E]]? --[[User:Guillaume2303|Guillaume2303]] ([[User talk:Guillaume2303|talk]]) 22:16, 3 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
:*Closing administrator should note that [[User:Night of the Big Wind]] has been [[WP:HOUND|following my deletion nominations]], and has been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANight_of_the_Big_Wind&action=historysubmit&diff=463907432&oldid=463906043cautioned to desist]. His "keep" is not a good-faith contribution. [[User:ScottyBerg|ScottyBerg]] ([[User talk:ScottyBerg|talk]]) 23:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete'''. The page feels a little bit like a memorial page, and there are the issues compounded by [[WP:BLP1E]]. As an aside, I recognize that BLP1E notes ''living'' persons (which, regretfully, Ms. Fitzgerald is no longer), but the situation that remains is that she is only notable for one event. --[[User:Dennisthe2|'''<span style="background:Orange;color:Black">Dennis The Tiger</span>''']] ([[User talk:Dennisthe2|Rawr]] and [[Special:Contributions/Dennisthe2|stuff]]) 22:52, 3 December 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. The page feels a little bit like a memorial page, and there are the issues compounded by [[WP:BLP1E]]. As an aside, I recognize that BLP1E notes ''living'' persons (which, regretfully, Ms. Fitzgerald is no longer), but the situation that remains is that she is only notable for one event. --[[User:Dennisthe2|'''<span style="background:Orange;color:Black">Dennis The Tiger</span>''']] ([[User talk:Dennisthe2|Rawr]] and [[Special:Contributions/Dennisthe2|stuff]]) 22:52, 3 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
* '''Keep''' I really hate the idea that she's been branded a liar with no evidence to support that. Maybe it's true, but the IT should not apologise to the employer without telling us exactly why. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding |
* '''Keep''' I really hate the idea that she's been branded a liar with no evidence to support that. Maybe it's true, but the IT should not apologise to the employer without telling us exactly why. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding |
Revision as of 23:29, 3 December 2011
AfDs for this article:
- Kate Fitzgerald (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO. Subject of article notable only because of suicide and events surrounding it. ScottyBerg (talk) 18:36, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Note: This is the first AfD for this article. Previous AfD was for a fictional character of the same name. ScottyBerg (talk) 18:37, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete I originally put a prod2 with "sad as this story is, it's a classical case of BLP1E. In addition, the article reads more like an attack piece on the Savages and The Communications Clinic". This still holds. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 18:56, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Not only did the subject of this article play an important, and cited, role in Ireland during the US Election but she was also active in Irish political life. I have just added citations confirming this. I've looked at this article and if anything it's being far too kind about the role of The Communications Clinic. There are many places on the internet which are far more straightforward. 89.101.59.188 (talk) 19:41, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - This young woman had a promising future in Irish public life. In addition, the manner in which the paper has handled her article has become a matter of public discussion in itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nodin (talk • contribs) 21:01, 3 December 2011 (UTC) This template must be substituted.
- If that is true, then there could conceivably be an article on the handling of the article, it doesn't make Fitzgerald notable, though. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 22:16, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly notable, but the article can be improved. Night of the Big Wind talk 21:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Would you mind explaining why you think that this does not fall under WP:BLP1E? --Guillaume2303 (talk) 22:16, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Closing administrator should note that User:Night of the Big Wind has been following my deletion nominations, and has been to desist. His "keep" is not a good-faith contribution. ScottyBerg (talk) 23:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. The page feels a little bit like a memorial page, and there are the issues compounded by WP:BLP1E. As an aside, I recognize that BLP1E notes living persons (which, regretfully, Ms. Fitzgerald is no longer), but the situation that remains is that she is only notable for one event. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:52, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I really hate the idea that she's been branded a liar with no evidence to support that. Maybe it's true, but the IT should not apologise to the employer without telling us exactly why. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by Meemeep (talk • contribs) 23:00, 3 December 2011 (UTC) — Meemeep (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep - for next few weeks subject of multiple national newspaper articles. subject of prime time national TV interview (RTE 1, 3 Dec) and of national radio interviews (Newstalk). Subject of this article is linked with senior national figures in public life in Ireland, possibly leading to a much larger story revolving around the behaviour and ethical conflicts of a dominant PR company that both advises many national politicians from all parties and also runs the national broadcaster. MoyrossLADY (talk) 23:12, 3 December 2011 (UTC)