Jump to content

User talk:Sampajanna: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Yassmin Abdel-Magied: Acknowledgement
Line 73: Line 73:


I have reverted your edits as they are in breach of [[WP:BLP]]. The material is one sided, and seemed devoted to attacking this person (including by focusing on minor issues). Please note that the Daily Mail is not a reliable source (see [[WP:DAILYMAIL]]). Please take the time to review WP:BLP, and note the consequences if you continue to violate it include being blocked from editing. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 00:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
I have reverted your edits as they are in breach of [[WP:BLP]]. The material is one sided, and seemed devoted to attacking this person (including by focusing on minor issues). Please note that the Daily Mail is not a reliable source (see [[WP:DAILYMAIL]]). Please take the time to review WP:BLP, and note the consequences if you continue to violate it include being blocked from editing. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 00:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

'''RESPONSE BY [[User:Sampajanna|Sampajanna]] ([[User talk:Sampajanna#top|talk]]) 00:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC)SAMPAJANNA[[User:Sampajanna|Sampajanna]] ([[User talk:Sampajanna#top|talk]]) 00:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC)''':

No problem with reversion of edit mentioned above. However, another section has also been deleted. PLEASE SEE BELOW [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) that the alternative source is NOT the Daily Mail. It is, in fact, '''news.com'''

(Alternate source inserted clearly stating that this is a CONTROVERSY commented on by Assistant Minister for Social Services and Multiculturalism Affairs)

===Remembrance Day=== {DELETED by Nick-D)
Despite the ANZAC Day outrage in April 2017, Abdel-Magied courted [[controversy]] by tweeting a similar post on [[Remembrance Day]], a memorial day observed on 11 November in [[Commonwealth of Nations]] member states since the end of the First World War to remember the members of their armed forces who have died in the line of duty. The post was criticised by some for being disrespectful and even labelled “pretty [[despicable]]” by Assistant Minister for Social Services and [[Multiculturalism in Australia|Multicultural]] Affairs [[Zed Seselja]]. <ref name="Australian">{{cite news|url=http://www.news.com.au/technology/online/social/absolutely-disgraceful-yasmin-courts-controversy-with-remembrance-day-tweet/news-story/79cbff9007c44977e03671edc43296af|title=‘Absolutely disgraceful’: Yassmin courts controversy with Remembrance Day tweet|work='''news.com'''|date=11 November 2017|accessdate=22 April 2018}}</ref>

_______________________________________________


:Also, please do not copy and paste material from news stories into Wikipedia again - this can also lead to blocks. [[Wikipedia:Copyright violations]] provides advice on this issue. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 00:29, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
:Also, please do not copy and paste material from news stories into Wikipedia again - this can also lead to blocks. [[Wikipedia:Copyright violations]] provides advice on this issue. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 00:29, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

'''RESPONSE BY [[User:Sampajanna|Sampajanna]] ([[User talk:Sampajanna#top|talk]]) 00:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC)SAMPAJANNA[[User:Sampajanna|Sampajanna]] ([[User talk:Sampajanna#top|talk]]) 00:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC)''':
Thanks for clarifying this. I will endeavour to paraphrase or cite more formally in future.

Revision as of 00:46, 22 April 2018

Sampajanna, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Sampajanna! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledged Sampajanna (talk) 04:31, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have signed my guestbook!!

The Barnstar of Good Humor
Hello Sampajanna Recently you have signed my guestbook! Thank you very much for signing my guestbook. Cheers NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 07:34, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should John Ridsdel entry be moved to Abu Sayyaf page?

Should John Ridsdel entry be moved to Abu Sayyaf page? Sampajanna (talk) 11:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sampajanna. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

A tag has been placed on File:Warren Rodwell and Peter Greste.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 17:18, 2 April 2017 (UTC) . .[reply]

>>> RESPONSE .... . In a spirit of friendly cooperation, Sampajanna deleted the residual link to Rodwell and Greste picture. Original picture speedily deleted by someone else, prior to Sampajanna being able to contest such. No desire to pursue matter further at this point of time. . .

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sampajanna. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edits as they are in breach of WP:BLP. The material is one sided, and seemed devoted to attacking this person (including by focusing on minor issues). Please note that the Daily Mail is not a reliable source (see WP:DAILYMAIL). Please take the time to review WP:BLP, and note the consequences if you continue to violate it include being blocked from editing. Nick-D (talk) 00:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE BY Sampajanna (talk) 00:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC)SAMPAJANNASampajanna (talk) 00:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC):[reply]

No problem with reversion of edit mentioned above. However, another section has also been deleted. PLEASE SEE BELOW Nick-D (talk) that the alternative source is NOT the Daily Mail. It is, in fact, news.com

(Alternate source inserted clearly stating that this is a CONTROVERSY commented on by Assistant Minister for Social Services and Multiculturalism Affairs)

===Remembrance Day=== {DELETED by Nick-D)

Despite the ANZAC Day outrage in April 2017, Abdel-Magied courted controversy by tweeting a similar post on Remembrance Day, a memorial day observed on 11 November in Commonwealth of Nations member states since the end of the First World War to remember the members of their armed forces who have died in the line of duty. The post was criticised by some for being disrespectful and even labelled “pretty despicable” by Assistant Minister for Social Services and Multicultural Affairs Zed Seselja. [1]

_______________________________________________


Also, please do not copy and paste material from news stories into Wikipedia again - this can also lead to blocks. Wikipedia:Copyright violations provides advice on this issue. Nick-D (talk) 00:29, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE BY Sampajanna (talk) 00:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC)SAMPAJANNASampajanna (talk) 00:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC): Thanks for clarifying this. I will endeavour to paraphrase or cite more formally in future.[reply]

  1. ^ "'Absolutely disgraceful': Yassmin courts controversy with Remembrance Day tweet". news.com. 11 November 2017. Retrieved 22 April 2018. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help)