Jump to content

Talk:Nymphaeaceae: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BotanyBot (talk | contribs)
Adding WP:PLANTS project banner: {{WikiProject Plants}}
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Plants|class=|importance=}}

[[image:Lotus1855.JPG|thumb]]
[[image:Lotus1855.JPG|thumb]]



Revision as of 03:24, 8 March 2007

WikiProject iconPlants Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

removed image

The Image:Waterlily1web.jpg was removed. I'm afraid the plant shown on it can't be identified precisely. Therefore, with all its artistic qualities, it doesn't give any new information, since there are already three other images, properly identified and of reasonable quality. Iorsh 06:53, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)

This is a hardy water lily hybrid which looks to me is the hybrid called N. 'James Brydon.' --Dara 03:06, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)


Is anyone seriously opposed to moving this article to a page called Nymphaeaceae, and having the common names of water lily link there? It'd be nice if the plant taxonomy articles all used a smilar naming convention for their pages--nixie 03:21, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)

That's would be against the naming convention of Wikipedia and of the Tree of Life Wikiproject. I would stick to the standard, but if you want to debate it, I would find the discussion there. Sorry I can't point you directly to it. --Chinasaur
I don't suppose that it matters anyway since all the plants in the family are called water-lillies--nixie 21:33, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Similar discussion has been dragging along with orchids, without much of a definitive resolution. Only a few families actually match up with a common name, so it doesn't come up often. I'd say to leave it at common name, people who look at lists of families will know what is going on, while nonspecialists seeing this article for the first time would be mystified by getting redirected to an "aceae". Stan 22:26, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Confusing..

This page is very confusing. I searched for water lilies and it redirected me to this page (water lily) which seems to an article on Nymphaeaceae (the water lily family) and water lilies merged together. And I notice some very common mistakes in the article like the confusion about lotus and waterlilies.

I think that the term waterlily or waterlilies should redirect viewers to the Nymphaea (the genus name of water lilies) page. And Nymphaeaceae should be it's own page because Nymphaeaceae is the name of the water lily family which includes other genera besides Nymphaea (water lilies) like Nuphar, Barclaya, Nelumbo, etc. --Dara 03:20, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)

Agreed (except that Nelumbo isn't in this family); I'm working on it - MPF 11:10, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Done - MPF 13:42, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I've changed the page "Water lily" to a disambiguation that redirects to Nymphaeaceae and Nelumbonaceae. Nov 2 2006