Jump to content

Talk:Chris Jacobs (politician): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Removal of Capitol information: We need a reliable source, not a headline from a left-wing website.
Line 36: Line 36:
== Removal of Capitol information ==
== Removal of Capitol information ==
I have restored, again, CharlesShirley's removal of reliably sourced content that is neutral and [[WP:DUE]] and I'm correcting my mispoken edit summary. The sources clearly say that he voted against the certification ''and'' that his actions and comments helped spur the riots. [[User:Praxidicae|<span style="color:#E52B50;font-size:11px">CUPIDICAE💕</span>]] 18:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
I have restored, again, CharlesShirley's removal of reliably sourced content that is neutral and [[WP:DUE]] and I'm correcting my mispoken edit summary. The sources clearly say that he voted against the certification ''and'' that his actions and comments helped spur the riots. [[User:Praxidicae|<span style="color:#E52B50;font-size:11px">CUPIDICAE💕</span>]] 18:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
:I have removed the synthesis information again. But on this talk page, you just made a claim again, without providing evidence. You did not provide a reliable source to support your addition. The Verge's headline is the only thing close to supporting your claim, but that is just one source and it is not a reliable source. The [[The New York Times|NY Times]] article does not say it and the WIVB article does not say it. You have not provided a reliable source to support your claim. See: [[Wikipedia:SYNTHESIS]]. Above you claim, without evidence, that Jacobs vote against certification "helped spur the riots". Where does it say that in the NY Times article? Where does it say that in the [[WIVB-TV|WIVB]] article? Once again, one headline from an "American left-wing technology news website operated by Vox Media" can support your synthesis. - [[User:CharlesShirley|CharlesShirley]] ([[User talk:CharlesShirley|talk]]) 20:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:16, 14 January 2021

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chris Jacobs (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

I see a bunch of names and dates in the infobox, many of which are not present in the body of the article. Not sure what the sources of these names and dates are. Anyone? 24.29.56.240 (talk) 06:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Capitol information

I have restored, again, CharlesShirley's removal of reliably sourced content that is neutral and WP:DUE and I'm correcting my mispoken edit summary. The sources clearly say that he voted against the certification and that his actions and comments helped spur the riots. CUPIDICAE💕 18:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the synthesis information again. But on this talk page, you just made a claim again, without providing evidence. You did not provide a reliable source to support your addition. The Verge's headline is the only thing close to supporting your claim, but that is just one source and it is not a reliable source. The NY Times article does not say it and the WIVB article does not say it. You have not provided a reliable source to support your claim. See: Wikipedia:SYNTHESIS. Above you claim, without evidence, that Jacobs vote against certification "helped spur the riots". Where does it say that in the NY Times article? Where does it say that in the WIVB article? Once again, one headline from an "American left-wing technology news website operated by Vox Media" can support your synthesis. - CharlesShirley (talk) 20:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]