Talk:Chris Jacobs (politician): Difference between revisions
→Removal of Capitol information: We need a reliable source, not a headline from a left-wing website--which contradicts itself. |
|||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
::Also, if you read the Verge article (not a reliable source), the article flat out states that Jacobs' vote came after the attack on the capitol. His vote could not "spur" the morons into action if the vote happened after the attack. It just can't. So all you have provided is a headline to an article from an obscure left-wing website and the body of the article contradicts its own headline. You have not provided a reliable source. There is no there there. - [[User:CharlesShirley|CharlesShirley]] ([[User talk:CharlesShirley|talk]]) 20:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC) |
::Also, if you read the Verge article (not a reliable source), the article flat out states that Jacobs' vote came after the attack on the capitol. His vote could not "spur" the morons into action if the vote happened after the attack. It just can't. So all you have provided is a headline to an article from an obscure left-wing website and the body of the article contradicts its own headline. You have not provided a reliable source. There is no there there. - [[User:CharlesShirley|CharlesShirley]] ([[User talk:CharlesShirley|talk]]) 20:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
:::{{tq|"American left-wing technology news website operated by Vox Media" cannot support your synthesis. - }} First, it's not my synthesis, second, you're wrong about bias - a biased source doesn't make it unreliable. Go ahead and read up on that before you continue your egregious POV pushing. [[User:Praxidicae|<span style="color:#E52B50;font-size:11px">CUPIDICAE💕</span>]] 20:42, 14 January 2021 (UTC) |
:::{{tq|"American left-wing technology news website operated by Vox Media" cannot support your synthesis. - }} First, it's not my synthesis, second, you're wrong about bias - a biased source doesn't make it unreliable. Go ahead and read up on that before you continue your egregious POV pushing. [[User:Praxidicae|<span style="color:#E52B50;font-size:11px">CUPIDICAE💕</span>]] 20:42, 14 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
::::Ah, so you see that it is synthesis. It might be your original idea. But it is synthesis. Where is the reliable source? One headline is all you have provided and the underlying article contradicts the headline. Why are you POV pushing? There are no reliable sources that support your POV but you want to put the POV in the article anyway. Why are you POV pushing? - [[User:CharlesShirley|CharlesShirley]] ([[User talk:CharlesShirley|talk]]) 20:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC) |
::::Ah, so you see that it is synthesis. It might not be your original idea. But it is synthesis. Where is the reliable source? One headline is all you have provided and the underlying article contradicts the headline. Why are you POV pushing? There are no reliable sources that support your POV but you want to put the POV in the article anyway. Why are you POV pushing? - [[User:CharlesShirley|CharlesShirley]] ([[User talk:CharlesShirley|talk]]) 20:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:46, 14 January 2021
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chris Jacobs (politician) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chris Jacobs (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070813060748/http://www.dos.state.ny.us/pres/pr2006/confirmed5206.htm to http://www.dos.state.ny.us/pres/pr2006/confirmed5206.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Infobox
I see a bunch of names and dates in the infobox, many of which are not present in the body of the article. Not sure what the sources of these names and dates are. Anyone? 24.29.56.240 (talk) 06:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Removal of Capitol information
I have restored, again, CharlesShirley's removal of reliably sourced content that is neutral and WP:DUE and I'm correcting my mispoken edit summary. The sources clearly say that he voted against the certification and that his actions and comments helped spur the riots. CUPIDICAE💕 18:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- I have removed the synthesis information again. But on this talk page, you just made a claim again, without providing evidence. You did not provide a reliable source to support your addition. The Verge's headline is the only thing close to supporting your claim, but that is just one source and it is not a reliable source. The NY Times article does not say it and the WIVB article does not say it. You have not provided a reliable source to support your claim. See: Wikipedia:SYNTHESIS. Above you claim, without evidence, that Jacobs' vote against certification "helped spur the riots". Where does it say that in the NY Times article? Where does it say that in the WIVB article? Once again, one headline from an "American left-wing technology news website operated by Vox Media" cannot support your synthesis. - CharlesShirley (talk) 20:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Also, if you read the Verge article (not a reliable source), the article flat out states that Jacobs' vote came after the attack on the capitol. His vote could not "spur" the morons into action if the vote happened after the attack. It just can't. So all you have provided is a headline to an article from an obscure left-wing website and the body of the article contradicts its own headline. You have not provided a reliable source. There is no there there. - CharlesShirley (talk) 20:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
"American left-wing technology news website operated by Vox Media" cannot support your synthesis. -
First, it's not my synthesis, second, you're wrong about bias - a biased source doesn't make it unreliable. Go ahead and read up on that before you continue your egregious POV pushing. CUPIDICAE💕 20:42, 14 January 2021 (UTC)- Ah, so you see that it is synthesis. It might not be your original idea. But it is synthesis. Where is the reliable source? One headline is all you have provided and the underlying article contradicts the headline. Why are you POV pushing? There are no reliable sources that support your POV but you want to put the POV in the article anyway. Why are you POV pushing? - CharlesShirley (talk) 20:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Also, if you read the Verge article (not a reliable source), the article flat out states that Jacobs' vote came after the attack on the capitol. His vote could not "spur" the morons into action if the vote happened after the attack. It just can't. So all you have provided is a headline to an article from an obscure left-wing website and the body of the article contradicts its own headline. You have not provided a reliable source. There is no there there. - CharlesShirley (talk) 20:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Mid-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class New York (state) articles
- Mid-importance New York (state) articles
- C-Class Western New York articles
- Unknown-importance Western New York articles
- WikiProject Western New York
- C-Class Conservatism articles
- Unknown-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- C-Class US State Legislatures articles
- Unknown-importance US State Legislatures articles
- WikiProject US State Legislatures articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class U.S. Congress articles
- Unknown-importance U.S. Congress articles
- WikiProject U.S. Congress persons