Against Democracy: Difference between revisions
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit |
|||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
==Reception== |
==Reception== |
||
Law professor [[Ilya Somin]], reviewing the book for [[The Volokh Conspiracy]] in ''[[The Washington Post]]'', described it as an "important new book" whose "analysis of epistocratic alternatives to democracy is worth serious consideration – even if most of these ideas are nowhere near ready for large-scale implementation".<ref>Ilya Somin, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/09/03/democracy-vs-epistacracy/ "Democracy vs. Epistocracy"], September 3, 2016.</ref> ''[[Kirkus Reviews]]'' said that the book is "Sure to cause howls of disagreement, but in the current toxic partisan climate, Brennan's polemic is as worth weighing as any other."<ref>[https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/jason-brennan/against-democracy/ ''Against Democracy'' by Jason Brennan], ''Kirkus Reviews'', June 15, 2016.</ref> |
|||
''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' reviewer Molly Sauter found the book's premises "solidly argued, even lively, but not particularly novel" and would have liked Brennan to give more attention to the underlying causes of the problems it describes.<ref>Molly Sauter, [http://www.latimes.com/books/jacketcopy/la-ca-jc-jaffe-brennan-20160907-snap-story.html "How do we make America great? 'Necessary Trouble' and 'Against Democracy' take contrasting views"], ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', September 16, 2016.</ref> ''[[New York (magazine)|New York]] Magazine''{{'}}s Jesse Singal challenges Brennan's position, in particular the premise that a more qualified electorate would necessarily produce better decisions.<ref>Jesse Singal, [http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2016/10/dissecting-a-professors-argument-against-dumb-people-voting.html "What a Georgetown Professor Got Wrong When He Argued That Maybe Dumb People Shouldn’t Be Allowed to Vote"], ''[[New York (magazine)|New York]]'', October 5, 2016.</ref> {{Disputed inline|Talk page section|date=March 2018|reason=Both reference and inline text refer to New York Magazine, but url goes to a different url, thecut.com}} ''[[Current Affairs (magazine)|Current Affairs]]'' editor [[Nathan J. Robinson]] |
''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' reviewer Molly Sauter found the book's premises "solidly argued, even lively, but not particularly novel" and would have liked Brennan to give more attention to the underlying causes of the problems it describes.<ref>Molly Sauter, [http://www.latimes.com/books/jacketcopy/la-ca-jc-jaffe-brennan-20160907-snap-story.html "How do we make America great? 'Necessary Trouble' and 'Against Democracy' take contrasting views"], ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', September 16, 2016.</ref> ''[[New York (magazine)|New York]] Magazine''{{'}}s Jesse Singal challenges Brennan's position, in particular the premise that a more qualified electorate would necessarily produce better decisions.<ref>Jesse Singal, [http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2016/10/dissecting-a-professors-argument-against-dumb-people-voting.html "What a Georgetown Professor Got Wrong When He Argued That Maybe Dumb People Shouldn’t Be Allowed to Vote"], ''[[New York (magazine)|New York]]'', October 5, 2016.</ref> {{Disputed inline|Talk page section|date=March 2018|reason=Both reference and inline text refer to New York Magazine, but url goes to a different url, thecut.com}} Discussing ''Against Democracy'' in mid-2017 in the context of increasing numbers of works critical of democracy since mid-2016, ''[[Current Affairs (magazine)|Current Affairs]]'' editor [[Nathan J. Robinson]] said that Brennan's book made "the most spirited and comprehensive" such argument but faulted the author for not addressing epistocracy's vulnerability to [[confirmation bias]] and its potential to help restore since-abolished hierarchies, naming [[Jim Crow laws]] as a specific example.<ref>Nathan J. Robinson, [https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/06/democracy-probably-a-good-thing "Democracy: Probably a Good Thing"], ''Current Affairs'', June 27, 2017.</ref> |
||
==Translations== |
==Translations== |
||
Revision as of 17:11, 3 May 2021
 | |
| Author | Jason Brennan |
|---|---|
| Sprache | Englisch |
| Subject | Political philosophy |
| Published | 2016 (Princeton University Press) |
| Publication place | Vereinigte Staaten |
| Media type | |
| Pages | 304 |
| ISBN | 978-0-691-16260-7 |
Against Democracy is a 2016 book by American political philosopher Jason Brennan.[1]
The book challenges the belief that the simplified version of democracy used in the 21st century is good and moral.
In his work, Brennan primarily suggests that voters tend to be irrational and ignorant about politics.[2] He believes that there is little incentive for voters to inform themselves about politics, as they believe (correctly) that one vote will not make a great difference in the overall election results. Moreover, he states that voters tend to make decisions that are ideologically inclined and easily manipulated.
Brennan presents and discusses different alternatives of "the rule of the knowledgeable" (epistocracy), where only the most knowledgeable voters get to elect our leaders.[3]
Reception
Law professor Ilya Somin, reviewing the book for The Volokh Conspiracy in The Washington Post, described it as an "important new book" whose "analysis of epistocratic alternatives to democracy is worth serious consideration – even if most of these ideas are nowhere near ready for large-scale implementation".[4] Kirkus Reviews said that the book is "Sure to cause howls of disagreement, but in the current toxic partisan climate, Brennan's polemic is as worth weighing as any other."[5]
Los Angeles Times reviewer Molly Sauter found the book's premises "solidly argued, even lively, but not particularly novel" and would have liked Brennan to give more attention to the underlying causes of the problems it describes.[6] New York Magazine's Jesse Singal challenges Brennan's position, in particular the premise that a more qualified electorate would necessarily produce better decisions.[7] [disputed – discuss] Discussing Against Democracy in mid-2017 in the context of increasing numbers of works critical of democracy since mid-2016, Current Affairs editor Nathan J. Robinson said that Brennan's book made "the most spirited and comprehensive" such argument but faulted the author for not addressing epistocracy's vulnerability to confirmation bias and its potential to help restore since-abolished hierarchies, naming Jim Crow laws as a specific example.[8]
Translations
The book has been translated into 10 languages.
In 2020 the Ukrainian translation of Against Democracy by Jason Brennan was listed by PEN Ukraine among the best translations of Humanitaristics published in 2020.[9] Also the translation was short-listed for Ukraine's National Book of the Year ‘2020 Award.[10]
See also
External links
References
- ^ "Brennan, J.: Against Democracy (eBook and Hardcover)". press.princeton.edu. Retrieved October 1, 2016.
- ^ Brennan, Jason. Against Democracy.
- ^ Purdy, Jedediah. "Votes of No Confidence". Book Forum. Retrieved October 1, 2016.
- ^ Ilya Somin, "Democracy vs. Epistocracy", September 3, 2016.
- ^ Against Democracy by Jason Brennan, Kirkus Reviews, June 15, 2016.
- ^ Molly Sauter, "How do we make America great? 'Necessary Trouble' and 'Against Democracy' take contrasting views", Los Angeles Times, September 16, 2016.
- ^ Jesse Singal, "What a Georgetown Professor Got Wrong When He Argued That Maybe Dumb People Shouldn’t Be Allowed to Vote", New York, October 5, 2016.
- ^ Nathan J. Robinson, "Democracy: Probably a Good Thing", Current Affairs, June 27, 2017.
- ^ The Best Ukrainian Books of 2020 Year. PEN Ukraine, December 28, 2020 (in Ukrainian)
- ^ Ukraine’s National Book of the Year ‘2020 Award (Knyzhka Roku ‘2020, in Ukrainian)