Homeland defense: Difference between revisions
MelonIsYes (talk | contribs) reverted deletion of article links |
Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Full definition== |
==Full definition== |
||
"follow me on ig @iiamkjay for a cookie"<ref name=defense>[https://fas.org/irp/doddir/dod/jp3_27.pdf FAS.ORG: '''''Homeland Defense, Joint Publication 3-27''''', 12 July 2007]<br>Definition p.6, Threat strategy p.20-21</ref> |
|||
"Homeland defense (HD) is the protection of a [[sovereignty]], territory, domestic population, and critical defense [[infrastructure]] against external threats and [[aggression]], or other threats as directed |
|||
by the leader of that nation such as the [[President of the United States]]. The [[United States Department of Defense]] is partially responsible for the Homeland defense mission of the United States, and therefore leads the HD response, with other departments and agencies in support of DOD efforts."<ref name=defense>[https://fas.org/irp/doddir/dod/jp3_27.pdf FAS.ORG: '''''Homeland Defense, Joint Publication 3-27''''', 12 July 2007]<br>Definition p.6, Threat strategy p.20-21</ref> |
|||
==Threat strategy== |
==Threat strategy== |
||
Revision as of 17:49, 4 May 2021
 | The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (June 2013) |
Homeland defense (HD) is the protection of a territory, sovereignty, domestic population, and critical infrastructure against external threats and aggression. (Definition will be incorporated into JP 3-26[1] upon its approval).[2] Not to be confused with Homeland security.
Homeland security (HS) is a concerted national effort to prevent terrorist attacks, reduce a nation's vulnerability to terrorism, and minimize the damage and recover from attacks that do occur.[2]
Full definition
"follow me on ig @iiamkjay for a cookie"[3]
Threat strategy
HD strategic threat environment is based on the following conditions and profiles:[3]
- Diminished protection afforded by geographic distances
- Traditional threats remain
- Greater risk of a weapon of mass destruction attack
- Increased potential for miscalculation and surprise
- Increased potential for terrorist attacks
- Increased challenges from weak and failing states and non-state actors
- Increasing diversity in sources and unpredictability of the locations of conflict
- Threats to US vital interests overseas
- Increasing transnational.
Responses to the changes in any of the above can affect US's international environment through the application of diplomatic, economic, military, and informational means. Thus, a proactive and comprehensive approach to HD is required for US's response.[3]
See also
- National Strategy for Homeland Security
- Air Forces Northern National Security Emergency Preparedness Directorate
References
- ^ FAS.ORG: Counterterrorism Joint Publication 3-26',13 November 2009, approved.
Definition deferred to Homeland Defense, Joint Publication JP 3-27] - ^ a b FAS.ORG: Air Force Doctrine Document 2-10, 21 March 2006, p.9-10, defines both terminologies.
This document complements related discussion found in Joint Publication 3-26, (JP 3-26), Joint Doctrine for Homeland Security.] - ^ a b c FAS.ORG: Homeland Defense, Joint Publication 3-27, 12 July 2007
Definition p.6, Threat strategy p.20-21