Jump to content

Habermas–Rawls debate: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Updated information.
Line 22: Line 22:


{{DEFAULTSORT:Habermas-Rawls debate}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Habermas-Rawls debate}}
[[Category:Jürgen Habermas]]
[[Category:Analytic philosophy]]
[[Category:Continental philosophy]]
[[Category:Continental philosophy]]
[[Category:Philosophical debates]]
[[Category:Intellectual history]]
[[Category:Philosophical arguments]]
[[Category:John Rawls]]
[[Category:John Rawls]]
[[Category:Jürgen Habermas]]

[[Category:Philosophical arguments]]
[[Category:Philosophical debates]]


{{philosophy-stub}}
{{philosophy-stub}}

Revision as of 04:31, 3 June 2021

The Habermas–Rawls debate is the exchange which took place between John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas in The Journal of Philosophy in 1995.[1][2]

See also

References

  1. ^ Pedersen, J. (2012). "Justification and Application: The Revival of the Rawls-Habermas Debate". Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 42 (3): 399–432. doi:10.1177/0048393111414723.
  2. ^ Finlayson, James Gordon (1 April 2007). "The Habermas-Rawls Dispute Redivivus". Politics and Ethics Review. 3 (1): 144–162. doi:10.1177/1743453X0700300111.

Further reading

Finlayson, Gordon (2019). The Habermas-Rawls Debate. Columbia University Press. ISBN 9780231549011.

Finlayson, James Gordon (2016). "Where the Right Gets in: On Rawls's Criticism of Habermas's Conception of Legitimacy" (PDF). Kantian Review. 21 (2): 161–183. doi:10.1017/S1369415416000017.