Jump to content

User talk:Deedman22: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 7: Line 7:


An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Nero]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Seneca]]<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Nero check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Nero?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Nero]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Seneca]]<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Nero check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Nero?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.

{{unblock|reason=Unfair block. Did not violate 3-revert rule, and other party does no want to collaborate (i.e. him blocking me, therefore voiding any possibility of collaboration) so "refusal to collaborate" directed towards me is unfounded. not sure what is meant by "battleground mentality", would like an explanation of the term, and examples (if possible)? i was simply trying to engage in discourse. thank you. [[User:Deedman22|Deedman22]] ([[User talk:Deedman22#top|talk]]) 02:37, 23 June 2021 (UTC)}}


([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 05:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 05:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:37, 23 June 2021

no BG images

Hi, I see you are removing backgrounds of some firearms images. I like such cleanups of images, but do not like when the original image size and details are reduced of the new images. Please try to keep HQ images at the original quality level and keep on the good work.--Francis Flinch (talk) 14:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seneca.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Deedman22 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Unfair block. Did not violate 3-revert rule, and other party does no want to collaborate (i.e. him blocking me, therefore voiding any possibility of collaboration) so "refusal to collaborate" directed towards me is unfounded. not sure what is meant by "battleground mentality", would like an explanation of the term, and examples (if possible)? i was simply trying to engage in discourse. thank you. Deedman22 (talk) 02:37, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Unfair block. Did not violate 3-revert rule, and other party does no want to collaborate (i.e. him blocking me, therefore voiding any possibility of collaboration) so "refusal to collaborate" directed towards me is unfounded. not sure what is meant by "battleground mentality", would like an explanation of the term, and examples (if possible)? i was simply trying to engage in discourse. thank you. [[User:Deedman22|Deedman22]] ([[User talk:Deedman22#top|talk]]) 02:37, 23 June 2021 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Unfair block. Did not violate 3-revert rule, and other party does no want to collaborate (i.e. him blocking me, therefore voiding any possibility of collaboration) so "refusal to collaborate" directed towards me is unfounded. not sure what is meant by "battleground mentality", would like an explanation of the term, and examples (if possible)? i was simply trying to engage in discourse. thank you. [[User:Deedman22|Deedman22]] ([[User talk:Deedman22#top|talk]]) 02:37, 23 June 2021 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Unfair block. Did not violate 3-revert rule, and other party does no want to collaborate (i.e. him blocking me, therefore voiding any possibility of collaboration) so "refusal to collaborate" directed towards me is unfounded. not sure what is meant by "battleground mentality", would like an explanation of the term, and examples (if possible)? i was simply trying to engage in discourse. thank you. [[User:Deedman22|Deedman22]] ([[User talk:Deedman22#top|talk]]) 02:37, 23 June 2021 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Alexander the Great. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 22:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would just like to add that you were blocked not just for edit-warring, but as I noted in the block log: personal attacks, a general battleground mentality, and failure to collaborate with other editors. If this persists after your block expires, the next block will probably be indefinite.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]