Jump to content

User talk:Deedman22: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 10: Line 10:


([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 05:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 05:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

== June 2021 ==
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]] and violating the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], as you did at [[:Alexander the Great]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 22:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-3block -->
*I would just like to add that you were blocked not just for edit-warring, but as I noted in the block log: personal attacks, a general battleground mentality, and failure to collaborate with other editors. If this persists after your block expires, the next block will probably be indefinite.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 22:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|1=Unfair block. Did not violate 3-revert rule, and other party does no want to collaborate (i.e. him blocking me, therefore voiding any possibility of collaboration) so "refusal to collaborate" directed towards me is unfounded. not sure what is meant by "battleground mentality", would like an explanation of the term, and examples (if possible)? i was simply trying to engage in discourse. thank you. Deedman22 (talk) 02:37, 23 June 2021 (UTC)|decline=Good block, in fact I think you got of lightly. First off you don't need 3 reverts to get a block for edit warring. Secondly your comment on the talk page are completely unacceptable. "[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alexander_the_Great&diff=prev&oldid=1029914971 I am wondering, sometimes, if I am engaged in discourse with a homosexual]" is right out of line. Take a good long look at [[WP:NPA|no personal attacks]] which is a policy that prohibits such commentary about other editors. While you are at it consider how that comments sounds in pretty much any part of society even beyond Wikipedia. That was not your only inappropriate comment but that is plenty. 1 week is lenient, I would have done a lot more if I had seen this first. <small>[[User talk:HighInBC|<b style="color:Green">HighInBC</b>]] <small><sup>Need help? '''[[User talk:HighInBC|Just ask.]]'''</sup></small></small> 06:36, 23 June 2021 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 08:44, 23 June 2021

no BG images

Hi, I see you are removing backgrounds of some firearms images. I like such cleanups of images, but do not like when the original image size and details are reduced of the new images. Please try to keep HQ images at the original quality level and keep on the good work.--Francis Flinch (talk) 14:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seneca.


(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]