User talk:Deedman22

no BG images

Hi, I see you are removing backgrounds of some firearms images. I like such cleanups of images, but do not like when the original image size and details are reduced of the new images. Please try to keep HQ images at the original quality level and keep on the good work.--Francis Flinch (talk) 14:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seneca.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Alexander the Great. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 22:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

• I would just like to add that you were blocked not just for edit-warring, but as I noted in the block log: personal attacks, a general battleground mentality, and failure to collaborate with other editors. If this persists after your block expires, the next block will probably be indefinite.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Deedman22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Unfair block. Did not violate 3-revert rule, and other party does no want to collaborate (i.e. him blocking me, therefore voiding any possibility of collaboration) so "refusal to collaborate" directed towards me is unfounded. not sure what is meant by "battleground mentality", would like an explanation of the term, and examples (if possible)? i was simply trying to engage in discourse. thank you. Deedman22 (talk) 02:37, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Good block, in fact I think you got of lightly. First off you don't need 3 reverts to get a block for edit warring. Secondly your comment on the talk page are completely unacceptable. "I am wondering, sometimes, if I am engaged in discourse with a homosexual" is right out of line. Take a good long look at no personal attacks which is a policy that prohibits such commentary about other editors. While you are at it consider how that comments sounds in pretty much any part of society even beyond Wikipedia. That was not your only inappropriate comment but that is plenty. 1 week is lenient, I would have done a lot more if I had seen this first. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 06:36, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may not remove block reviews while you are still blocked. Once the block has expired you may blank or archive them. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 09:10, 23 June 2021 (UTC)