Jump to content

User talk:StraussInTheHouse: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: MassMessage delivery
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:StraussInTheHouse/Archive 7) (bot
Line 10: Line 10:
| minthreadsleft = 1
| minthreadsleft = 1
}}
}}
== new draft, could use any advice you have ==

Hi SITH
Hope all is good, you were a great help a few years ago when i made my first draft of this , I have made a brand new one and have added in publications and circulations amounts to help with notoriety, Does this look ok to you?.
As the last one was deleted is there anything else i need to do for it to be reviewed for approval, Thanks in advance
[[User:Mickmonaghan343|Mickmonaghan343]] ([[User talk:Mickmonaghan343|talk]]) 19:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Luca_Stricagnoli

Hi {{u|Mickmonaghan343}}, it looks to me that you’ve established [[WP:BIO|biographical notability]] for Stricagnoli, which is good. I can see a reviewer pausing over the [[WP:TONE|tone]] as it is a little [[WP:NOTRESUME|CV-like]]. Other than that, the Awards section is probably best off using a [[WP:TABLE|tabular format]]. But as I say, the criteria for inclusion appear to be met with reliable sourcing, so this draft shouldn’t be deleted IMO. Which draft was deleted? You can request restoration under [[WP:REFUND|certain circumstances]]. Hope this helps! '''<span style="font-family: Arial">[[User:StraussInTheHouse|<span style="color: red">SITH</span>]] [[User talk:StraussInTheHouse|<span style="color: blue">(talk)</span>]]</span>''' 19:43, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

I made one a few years ago but it was praising him to much so this one is short and to the point, i really appreciate the quick reply and the advice and ill get working on the above. last time they said he wasnt notable enough so i spent alot of time on the references and with including the paper circulations i hope i am not going overboard. It has been so long i had forgotten if it will be reviewed in time automatically as i didnt start this in sandbox i just clicked on the old article and it gave me the option to restart so i wasnt sure if it would be eventually reviewed or remain in limbo
[[User:Mickmonaghan343|Mickmonaghan343]] ([[User talk:Mickmonaghan343|talk]]) 20:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

== GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021 ==
== GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021 ==



Revision as of 06:52, 30 June 2021


Welcome to StraussInTheHouse's talk page!

  • You can create a new thread by clicking here. Please give descriptive titles to new sections.
  • If you're leaving a message in an existing thread, please indent your posts with colons.
  • Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
  • Replies will be made here, please notify me of discussions elsewhere with {{ping|StraussInTheHouse}}.
  • Experienced users may stalk this page and answer any queries.
  • If you're contacting me about a draft, please read the FAQ page first.

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
  • This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.

Click here to opt out of any future messages.

--Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]