Talk:Meds (album): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:33, 1 November 2021

Albums C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Alternative music C‑class Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Read This passage. I maintain that despite the little picture of the album at the top, this article has nothing whatsoever to do with this album. Posting the review here, out of context, is just more confusing than informative. Dybeck 08:54, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The song title "Space Monkey" may be a reference to the novel/movie Fight Club, where space monkeys were the shaved soldiers of Project Mayhem.

The Kurt Cobain reference in not totally correct, as well is unneeded here! It should be edited out! The song referenced came out long after his death. The info on this page reads as it is a review of the album. Please leave this to either a blog or some album review website such as pitchforkmedia --buzlink 16:39, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Placebomeds.jpg

Image:Placebomeds.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation Needed?

I feel there are sufficient interpretations of the word MEDS that a disambiguation page could be warranted. In addition to the links given at the top of the article, I propose to add MEDS Band (similar to MICS - Medical_Implant_Communication_Service). AncientBrit 23:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because I Want You merge proposal

The WP:NOTABILITY of "Because I Want You", outside of a solitary chart placing, is dubious, and the article is a stub. I propose the article be merged with this. 165.228.231.15 (talk) 04:19, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Meds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.bpi.co.uk/certified-awards.aspx to http://www.bpi.co.uk/certified-awards.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true oder failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Meds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 October 2021

The request to rename this article to Meds (album) has been carried out.

If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag.

Meds → Meds (album) – I would say most would expect Meds to be a primary redirect to Medication, not an article about this Placebo album. 162 etc. (talk) 03:42, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support, possibly disambiguate. I would be surprised if there are not other potential meanings of the word. BD2412 T 04:39, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Medication gets 18,410 views compared with 1,876[[1]] for the album and all Google results other than this WP article are for the medication meaning or similar. Probably redirect to Medication (disambiguation) or create a new DAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:54, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support and redirect Meds to Medication.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support and redirect Meds to Medication. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:47, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose although I generally prefer disambiguation, I don't see anything other than the album called Meds. Why do we want to let a slang abbrev to get such treatment instead? Dicklyon (talk) 04:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support good argument by the nominator. Lesliechin1 (talk) 08:33, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 65: / Line 65: @@
 *'''Support''' and redirect [[Meds]] to [[Medication]]. [[User:In ictu oculi|In ictu oculi]] ([[User talk:In ictu oculi|talk]]) 20:47, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * '''Oppose''' although I generally prefer disambiguation, I don't see anything other than the album called Meds.  Why do we want to let a slang abbrev to get such treatment instead? [[User:Dicklyon|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon|talk]]) 04:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
+*'''Support''' good argument by the nominator. [[User:Lesliechin1|Lesliechin1]] ([[User talk:Lesliechin1|talk]]) 08:33, 1 November 2021 (UTC)