List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 55: Difference between revisions

Supreme Court of the United States
Supreme Court of the United States
	38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W
Established	March 4, 1789; 235 years ago
Location	Washington, D.C.
Coordinates	38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W
Composition method	Presidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized by	Constitution of the United States
Judge term length	Life tenure
Number of positions	9 (by statute)
Website	supremecourt.gov
Chief Justice of the United States
Currently	John Roberts
Since	September 29, 2005; 18 years ago

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 03:25, 17 November 2021

This is a list of the 57 cases reported in volume 55 (14 How.) of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States from December 1852 to March 1853.^[2]

Nominative reports

In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ”nominative reports”).

Benjamin Chew Howard

Starting with the 42nd volume of U.S. Reports, the Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States was Benjamin Chew Howard. Howard was Reporter of Decisions from 1843 to 1860, covering volumes 42 through 65 of United States Reports which correspond to volumes 1 through 24 of his Howard’s Reports. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, Philadelphia & Reading R.R. Co. v. Derby is 55 U.S. (14 How.) 468 (1853).

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 55 U.S. (14 How.)

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: ”The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .”. The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).^[3] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice). Due to an unfilled vacancy, when the cases in 55 U.S. (14 How.) were decided the Court comprised only these eight members:

Justice	Office	Home State	Succeeded	Date confirmed by the Senate (Vote)	Tenure on Supreme Court
Roger B. Taney	Chief Justice	Maryland	John Marshall	March 15, 1836 (29–15)	March 28, 1836 – October 12, 1864 (Died)
John McLean	Associate Justice	Ohio	Robert Trimble	March 7, 1829 (Acclamation)	January 11, 1830 – April 4, 1861 (Died)
James Moore Wayne	Associate Justice	Georgia	William Johnson	January 9, 1835 (Acclamation)	January 14, 1835 – July 5, 1867 (Died)
John Catron	Associate Justice	Tennessee	newly-created seat	March 8, 1837 (28–15)	May 1, 1837 – May 30, 1865 (Died)
Peter Vivian Daniel	Associate Justice	Virginia	Philip P. Barbour	March 2, 1841 (25–5)	January 10, 1842 – May 31, 1860 (Died)
Samuel Nelson	Associate Justice	New York	Smith Thompson	February 14, 1845 (Acclamation)	February 27, 1845 – November 28, 1872 (Retired)
Robert Cooper Grier	Associate Justice	Pennsylvania	Henry Baldwin	August 4, 1846 (Acclamation)	August 10, 1846 – January 31, 1870 (Retired)
Benjamin Robbins Curtis	Associate Justice	Massachusetts	Levi Woodbury	December 20, 1851 (Acclamation)	October 10, 1851 – September 30, 1857 (Resigned)

Notable cases in 55 U.S. (14 How.)

Le Roy v. Tatham

Le Roy v. Tatham, 55 U.S. (14 How.) 156 (1852), is a decision of the Supreme Court holding that an abstract principle can neither be patented nor claimed as an exclusive right.

Stephens v. Cady

In Stephens v. Cady, 55 U.S. (14 How.) 528 (1853), the Supreme Court held that a copyright is only notional property without corporeal tangible substance, and so it cannot be seized or sold in an execution sale.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

”C.C.D.” = United States Circuit Court for the District of . . .
- e.g.,”C.C.D.N.J.” = United States Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
”D.” = United States District Court for the District of . . .
- e.g.,”D. Mass.” = United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
”E.” = Eastern; ”M.” = Middle; ”N.” = Northern; ”S.” = Southern; ”W.” = Western
- e.g.,”C.C.S.D.N.Y.” = United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York
- e.g.,”M.D. Ala.” = United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
”Adm.” = Admiralty Court (a federal court)
”Ct. Cl.” = United States Court of Claims
”C.P.” = Court of Common Pleas (a state court)
The abbreviation of a state's name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that state’s judiciary at the time.
- e.g.,”Pa.” = Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- e.g.,”Me.” = Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

List of cases in 55 U.S. (14 How.)

Case Name	Page & year	Opinion of the Court	Concurring opinion(s)	Dissenting opinion(s)	Lower court	Disposition of case
Wylie v. Coxe	1 (1853)	Taney	none	none	C.C.D.C.	mandate denied
Ex parte Taylor	3 (1852)	per curiam	none	none	original jurisdiction	rule to show cause denied
Moore v. Illinois	13 (1852)	Grier	none	McLean	Ill.	affirmed
Kanouse v. Martin	23 (1852)	Taney	none	none	Super. Ct. N.Y. City	dismissal denied
Ex parte Many	24 (1853)	Taney	none	none	D. Mass.	mandamus denied
Brown v. Aspden’s Adm’rs	25 (1853)	Taney	none	none	C.C.E.D. Pa.	reargument refused
Hagan v. Walker	29 (1852)	Curtis	none	none	C.C.S.D. Ala.	reversed
Kennett v. Chambers	38 (1852)	Taney	none	none	D. Tex.	affirmed
Wiswall v. Sampson	52 (1853)	Nelson	none	none	C.C.S.D. Ala.	reversed
Sample v. Barnes	70 (1852)	Daniel	none	none	C.C.S.D. Miss.	affirmed
Raymond’s Lessee v. Longworth	76 (1852)	Catron	none	none	C.C.D. Ohio	affirmed
Herman v. Phalen	79 (1852)	Taney	none	none	C.C.E.D. La.	reversed
Rundle v. Delaware & Raritan Canal Co.	80 (1853)	Grier	Catron	Daniel	C.C.D.N.J.	affirmed
In re Kaine	103 (1853)	none	Catron, Curtis	Nelson, Taney, Daniel	C.C.S.D.N.Y.	habeas corpus & certiorari denied
Lawler v. Walker	149 (1852)	Wayne	none	none	Ohio	dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Le Roy v. Tatham	156 (1853)	McLean	none	Nelson	C.C.S.D.N.Y.	reversed
United States v. Rillieux’s Heirs	189 (1853)	Catron	none	none	E.D. La.	reversed
United States v. Gusman	193 (1853)	Catron	none	none	E.D. La.	reversed
Troy Iron & Nail Factory v. Corning	193 (1853)	Wayne	none	none	C.C.N.D.N.Y.	reversed
Silsby v. Foote	218 (1853)	Curtis	none	none	C.C.N.D.N.Y.	affirmed
E.P. Calkin & Co. v. Cocke	227 (1853)	Nelson	none	none	Tex.	reversed
Downey v. Hicks	240 (1853)	McLean	none	Daniel	C.C.S.D. Miss.	reversed
de Lane v. Moore	253 (1853)	Daniel	none	none	M.D. Ala.	affirmed
Vincennes Univ. v. Indiana	268 (1853)	McLean	none	Taney	Ind.	reversed
Christy v. Scott	282 (1853)	Curtis	none	none	D. Tex.	reversed
Christly v. Findley	296 (1852)	Curtis	none	none	D. Tex.	reversed
Christly v. Young	296 (1852)	Curtis	none	none	D. Tex.	reversed
Doss v. Tyack	297 (1853)	Grier	none	none	D. Tex.	affirmed
Christly v. Henley	297 (1853)	Curtis	none	none	D. Tex.	remanded to divided lower court
Perkins v. Fourniquet I	313 (1853)	Wayne	none	none	C.C.S.D. Miss.	reversed
Perkins v. Fourniquet II	328 (1853)	Taney	none	none	C.C.S.D. Miss.	reversed
Harris v. Hardeman	334 (1853)	Daniel	none	none	C.C.S.D. Miss.	affirmed
Hoyt v. Hammekin	346 (1853)	McLean	none	none	D. Tex.	affirmed
General Mutual Ins. Co. v. Sherwood	351 (1853)	Curtis	none	none	C.C.S.D.N.Y.	reversed
Peale v. Phipps	368 (1853)	Taney	none	none	C.C.E.D. La.	reversed
Cunningham v. Ashley	377 (1853)	McLean	none	none	Ark.	reversed
Bosley v. Wyatt	390 (1853)	Taney	none	none	C.C.D. Md.	affirmed
Ennis v. Smith	400 (1853)	Wayne	none	none	C.C.D.C.	reversed
Winder v. Caldwell	434 (1853)	Grier	none	none	C.C.D.C.	reversed
Salmon Falls Mfg. Co. v. Goddard	446 (1853)	Nelson	none	Curtis	C.C.D. Mass.	reversed
Nutt v. Minor	464 (1853)	Catron	none	none	C.C.D.C.	reversed
Philadelphia & R.R.R. Co. v. Derby	468 (1853)	Grier	none	Daniel	C.C.E.D. Pa.	affirmed
Webster v. Cooper	488 (1853)	Curtis	none	none	C.C.D. Me.	reversed
Sheppard v. Graves I	505 (1853)	Daniel	none	none	D. Tex.	affirmed
Sheppard v. Graves II	512 (1853)	Daniel	none	none	D. Tex.	affirmed
Marsh v. Brooks	513 (1853)	Catron	none	none	S.D. Iowa	affirmed
Jackson v. Hale	525 (1853)	Taney	none	none	D. Wis.	affirmed
Stephens v. Cady	528 (1853)	Nelson	none	none	C.C.D.R.I.	reversed
Stainback v. Rae	532 (1853)	Nelson	none	none	C.C.D. Mass.	reversed
Bloomer v. McQuewan	539 (1853)	Taney	none	none	C.C.W.D. Pa.	affirmed
Doolittle’s Lessee v. Bryan	563 (1853)	Grier	none	none	C.C.D. Ohio	remanded to divided lower court
Veazie v. Moor	568 (1853)	Daniel	none	none	Me.	affirmed
Boyden v. Burke	575 (1853)	Grier	none	none	C.C.D.C.	reversed
Walker v. Robbins	584 (1853)	Catron	none	none	C.C.S.D. Miss.	affirmed
Huff v. Hutchinson	586 (1853)	McLean	none	none	D. Wis.	affirmed
Goesele v. Bimeler	589 (1853)	McLean	none	none	C.C.D. Ohio	affirmed
Deacon v. Oliver	610 (1853)	Grier	none	none	C.C.D. Md.	affirmed

Notes and references

^ Lawson, Gary; Seidman, Guy (2001). "When Did the Constitution Become Law?". Notre Dame Law Review. 77: 1–37.
^ Anne Ashmore, DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS, Library, Supreme Court of the United States, 26 December 2018.
^ "Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. Retrieved April 7, 2021.

External links

[1] Case reports in volume 55 (14 How.) from Court Listener
[2] Case reports in volume 55 (14 How.) from the Caselaw Access Project of Harvard Law School
[3] Case reports in volume 55 (14 How.) from Google Scholar
[4] Case reports in volume 55 (14 How.) of Justia
[5] Case reports in volume 55 (14 How.) from Open Jurist
Website of the United States Supreme Court
United States Courts website about the Supreme Court
National Archives, Records of the Supreme Court of the United States
American Bar Association, How Does the Supreme Court Work?
The Supreme Court Historical Society

[1] Lawson, Gary; Seidman, Guy (2001). "When Did the Constitution Become Law?". Notre Dame Law Review. 77: 1–37.

[2] Anne Ashmore, DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS, Library, Supreme Court of the United States, 26 December 2018.

[3] "Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. Retrieved April 7, 2021.

[1]

[2]

[3]

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 This is a '''list of the 57 cases reported in volume 55 (14 How.) of ''[[United States Reports]]''''', decided by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] from December 1852 to March 1853.<ref>Anne Ashmore, ''DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS'', Library, Supreme Court of the United States, 26 December 2018.</ref>
 == Nominative reports ==
-In 1874, the U.S. government created the ''United States Reports'', and retroactively numbered older privately-published [[Law report|case reports]] as part of the new series.  As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of ''U.S. Reports'' have dual [[Case citation|citation forms]]; one for the volume number of ''U.S. Reports'', and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called "[[Nominate reports|nominative reports]]").
+In 1874, the U.S. government created the ''United States Reports'', and retroactively numbered older privately-published [[Law report|case reports]] as part of the new series.  As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of ''U.S. Reports'' have dual [[Case citation|citation forms]]; one for the volume number of ''U.S. Reports'', and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ”[[Nominate reports|nominative reports]]”).
 === Benjamin Chew Howard ===
-Starting with the 42nd volume of ''U.S. Reports'', the [[Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States]] was [[Benjamin Chew Howard]]. Howard was Reporter of Decisions from 1843 to 1860, covering volumes 42 through 65 of ''United States Reports'' which correspond to volumes 1 through 24 of his ''Howard's Reports''. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, ''Philadelphia & Reading R.R. Co. v. Derby'' is 55 U.S. (14 How.) 468 (1853).
+Starting with the 42nd volume of ''U.S. Reports'', the [[Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States]] was [[Benjamin Chew Howard]]. Howard was Reporter of Decisions from 1843 to 1860, covering volumes 42 through 65 of ''United States Reports'' which correspond to volumes 1 through 24 of his ''Howard’s Reports''. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, ''Philadelphia & Reading R.R. Co. v. Derby'' is 55 U.S. (14 How.) 468 (1853).
 == Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 55 U.S. (14 How.) ==
@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 {{see also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition}}
 {{see also|Taney Court}}
-The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to [[Congress of the United States|Congress]] to set the number of justices. Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/supreme_court|title=Supreme Court Research Guide |access-date=7 April 2021 |publisher=Georgetown Law Library}}</ref> Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to [[Seventh Circuit Act of 1807|seven]], [[Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837|nine]], [[Tenth Circuit Act of 1863|ten]], and back to [[Judiciary Act of 1869|nine]] justices (always including one chief justice). Due to an unfilled vacancy, when the cases in 55 U.S. (14 How.) were decided the Court comprised only these eight members:
+The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: ”The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .”. The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to [[Congress of the United States|Congress]] to set the number of justices. Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/supreme_court|title=Supreme Court Research Guide |access-date=7 April 2021 |publisher=Georgetown Law Library}}</ref> Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to [[Seventh Circuit Act of 1807|seven]], [[Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837|nine]], [[Tenth Circuit Act of 1863|ten]], and back to [[Judiciary Act of 1869|nine]] justices (always including one chief justice). Due to an unfilled vacancy, when the cases in 55 U.S. (14 How.) were decided the Court comprised only these eight members:
 {| class="wikitable sortable"
 |-
@@ Line 75: / Line 75: @@
 ===''Stephens v. Cady''===
-In ''[[Stephens v. Cady]]'', [https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86804/stephens-v-cady/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20528%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus    55 U.S. (14 How.) 528 (1853)], the Supreme Court held that a [[copyright]] is only notional property and has no corporeal tangible substance, so cannot be seized or sold in an execution sale.
+In ''[[Stephens v. Cady]]'', [https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86804/stephens-v-cady/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20528%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus    55 U.S. (14 How.) 528 (1853)], the Supreme Court held that a [[copyright]] is only notional property without corporeal tangible substance, and so it cannot be seized or sold in an execution sale.
 == Citation style ==
@@ Line 84: / Line 84: @@
 [[Bluebook]] citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.
-* "C.C.D." = United States Circuit Court for the District of . . .
+* ”C.C.D.” = United States Circuit Court for the District of . . .
-** ''e.g.,''"C.C.D.N.J." = United States Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
+** ''e.g.,''”C.C.D.N.J.” = United States Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
-* "D." = United States District Court for the District of . . .
+* ”D.” = United States District Court for the District of . . .
-** ''e.g.,''"D. Mass." = [[United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts]]
+** ''e.g.,''”D. Mass.” = [[United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts]]
-* "E." = Eastern; "M." = Middle; "N." = Northern; "S." = Southern; "W." = Western
+* ”E.” = Eastern; ”M.” = Middle; ”N.” = Northern; ”S.” = Southern; ”W.” = Western
-** ''e.g.,''"C.C.S.D.N.Y." = United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York
+** ''e.g.,''”C.C.S.D.N.Y.” = United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York
-** ''e.g.,''"M.D. Ala." = [[United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama]]
+** ''e.g.,''”M.D. Ala.” = [[United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama]]
-* "Adm." = [[Admiralty Court]] (a federal court)
+* ”Adm.” = [[Admiralty Court]] (a federal court)
-* "Ct. Cl." = [[United States Court of Claims]]
+* ”Ct. Cl.” = [[United States Court of Claims]]
-* "C.P." = [[Court of Common Pleas]] (a state court)
+* ”C.P.” = [[Court of Common Pleas]] (a state court)
-* The abbreviation of a state's name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that state's judiciary at the time.
+* The abbreviation of a state's name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that state’s judiciary at the time.
-** ''e.g.,''"Pa." = [[Supreme Court of Pennsylvania]]
+** ''e.g.,''”Pa.” = [[Supreme Court of Pennsylvania]]
-** ''e.g.,''"Me." = [[Supreme Judicial Court of Maine]]
+** ''e.g.,''”Me.” = [[Supreme Judicial Court of Maine]]
 == List of cases in 55 U.S. (14 How.) ==
 {|   class="wikitable sortable"
 |-
-! scope="col" style="width: 333px;" | Case Name
+! scope="col" style="width: 320px;" | Case Name
-! scope="col" style="width: 70px;" | Page & year
+! scope="col" style="width: 75px;" | Page & year
 ! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Opinion of the Court
 ! scope="col" style="width: 80px;" | Concurring opinion(s)
 ! scope="col" style="width: 150px;" | Dissenting opinion(s)
 ! scope="col" style="width: 116px;" | Lower court
-! scope="col" style="width: 200px;" | Disposition of case
+! scope="col" style="width: 233px;" | Disposition of case
 |-
 | ''Wylie v. Coxe''
@@ Line 120: / Line 120: @@
 | ''[[Ex parte]] Many''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86766/ex-parte-william-many/?q=%2255%20U.S.%2024%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                 24 (1853)] ||                                 Taney               ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts|D. Mass.]]      ||        [[mandamus]]  denied
 |-
-| ''Brown v. Aspden's Administrators''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86767/brown-v-aspdens/?q=%2255%20U.S.%2025%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  25 (1853)] ||                                       Taney            ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. Pa.]]      ||       reargument refused
+| ''Brown v. Aspden’s Adm’rs''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86767/brown-v-aspdens/?q=%2255%20U.S.%2025%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  25 (1853)] ||                                       Taney            ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. Pa.]]      ||       reargument refused
 |-
 | ''Hagan v. Walker''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86768/hagan-v-walker/?q=%2255%20U.S.%2029%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  29 (1852)] ||                                     Curtis             ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Ala.]]       ||        reversed
@@ Line 130: / Line 130: @@
 | ''Sample v. Barnes''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86771/sample-v-barnes/?q=%2255%20U.S.%2070%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  70 (1852)] ||                                           Daniel                ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Miss.]]      ||       affirmed
 |-
-| ''Raymond's Lessee v. Longworth''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86772/william-f-raymonds-lessee-v-nicholas-longworth/?q=%2255%20U.S.%2076%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  76 (1852)] ||                                                Catron           ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ohio]]      ||      affirmed
+| ''Raymond’s Lessee v. Longworth''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86772/william-f-raymonds-lessee-v-nicholas-longworth/?q=%2255%20U.S.%2076%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  76 (1852)] ||                                                Catron           ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ohio]]      ||      affirmed
 |-
 | ''Herman v. Phalen''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86773/herman-v-phalen/?q=%2255%20U.S.%2079%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  79 (1852)] ||                                             Taney              ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. La.]]      ||      reversed
@@ Line 142: / Line 142: @@
 | ''[[Le Roy v. Tatham]]''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86777/le-roy-v-tatham/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20156%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  156 (1853)] ||           McLean            ||          none          ||         Nelson          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]]      ||        reversed
 |-
-| ''United States v. Rillieux's Heirs''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86778/united-states-v-heirs-of-rillieux/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20189%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                 189 (1853)] ||                                            Catron               ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana| E.D. La.]]      ||       reversed
+| ''United States v. Rillieux’s Heirs''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86778/united-states-v-heirs-of-rillieux/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20189%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                 189 (1853)] ||                                            Catron               ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana| E.D. La.]]      ||       reversed
 |-
 | ''United States v. Gusman''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2620912/united-states-v-gusman/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20193%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  193 (1853)] ||                                            Catron               ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana|E.D. La.]]      ||     reversed
@@ Line 156: / Line 156: @@
 | ''de Lane v. Moore''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86783/de-lane-v-moore/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20253%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  253 (1853)] ||                                             Daniel              ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[M.D. Ala.]]      ||       affirmed
 |-
-| ''[[Vincennes University]] v. [[Indiana]]''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86784/board-of-trustees-for-vincennes-university-v-state-of-indiana/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20268%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  268 (1853)] ||                                            McLean               ||          none          ||         Taney          ||    [[Supreme Court of Indiana|Ind.]]      ||      reversed
+| ''[[Vincennes University|Vincennes Univ.]] v. [[Indiana]]''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86784/board-of-trustees-for-vincennes-university-v-state-of-indiana/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20268%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  268 (1853)] ||                                            McLean               ||          none          ||         Taney          ||    [[Supreme Court of Indiana|Ind.]]      ||      reversed
 |-
 | ''Christy v. Scott''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86785/christy-v-scott/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20282%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  282 (1853)] ||                                                Curtis           ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States District Court for the District of Texas|D. Tex.]]      ||      reversed
@@ Line 176: / Line 176: @@
 | ''Hoyt v. Hammekin''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86790/hoyt-v-hammekin-et-ux/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20346%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  346 (1853)] ||                                            McLean               ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States District Court for the District of Texas| D. Tex.]]      ||       affirmed
 |-
-| ''General Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sherwood''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86791/general-mut-ins-co-v-sherwood/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20351%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  351 (1853)] ||                                           Curtis                ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]]      ||       reversed
+| ''General Mutual Ins. Co. v. Sherwood''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86791/general-mut-ins-co-v-sherwood/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20351%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  351 (1853)] ||                                           Curtis                ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]]      ||       reversed
 |-
 | ''Peale v. Phipps''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86792/peale-v-phipps/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20368%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  368 (1853)] ||             Taney                 ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. La.]]      ||      reversed
@@ Line 188: / Line 188: @@
 | ''Winder v. Caldwell''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86796/winder-v-caldwell/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20434%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  434 (1853)] ||                                            Grier               ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]]        ||     reversed
 |-
-| ''Salmon Falls Manufacturing Co. v. Goddard''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86797/salmon-falls-mfg-co-v-goddard/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20446%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  446 (1853)] ||                                               Nelson            ||          none          ||         Curtis          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Mass.]]      ||       reversed
+| ''Salmon Falls Mfg. Co. v. Goddard''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86797/salmon-falls-mfg-co-v-goddard/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20446%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  446 (1853)] ||                                               Nelson            ||          none          ||         Curtis          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Mass.]]      ||       reversed
 |-
 | ''Nutt v. Minor''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86798/nutt-v-minor/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20464%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  464 (1853)] ||                                               Catron            ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]]       ||     reversed
 |-
-| ''[[Reading Company|Philadelphia & Reading R.R. Co.]] v. Derby''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86799/philadelphia-reading-r-co-v-derby/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20468%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  468 (1853)] ||                                                 Grier          ||          none          ||         Daniel          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. Pa.]]      ||     affirmed
+| ''[[Reading Company|Philadelphia & R.R.R. Co.]] v. Derby''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86799/philadelphia-reading-r-co-v-derby/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20468%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  468 (1853)] ||                                                 Grier          ||          none          ||         Daniel          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. Pa.]]      ||     affirmed
 |-
 | ''Webster v. Cooper''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86800/webster-v-cooper/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20488%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  488 (1853)] ||                                              Curtis             ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Me.]]      ||       reversed
@@ Line 210: / Line 210: @@
 | ''Bloomer v. McQuewan''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86806/bloomer-v-mcquewan/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20539%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  539 (1853)] ||                                            Taney               ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.W.D. Pa.]]      ||       affirmed
 |-
-| ''Doolittle's Lessee v. Bryan''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86807/doolittles-lessee-v-bryan/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20563%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  563 (1853)] ||                                              Grier             ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ohio]]      ||        [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]]
+| ''Doolittle’s Lessee v. Bryan''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86807/doolittles-lessee-v-bryan/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20563%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  563 (1853)] ||                                              Grier             ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ohio]]      ||        [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]]
 |-
 | ''Veazie v. Moor''     ||    align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86808/veazie-v-moor/?q=%2255%20U.S.%20568%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1852&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1854&court=scotus                  568 (1853)] ||                                             Daniel              ||          none          ||         none          ||    [[Supreme Judicial Court of Maine|Me.]]      ||       affirmed