Talk:Refractive index: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Refractive index/Archive 2) (bot |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
This language may be a bit ambiguous, as there are two interpretations: the speed of light in water may be (c÷1.333) or (c - 1.333×c). |
This language may be a bit ambiguous, as there are two interpretations: the speed of light in water may be (c÷1.333) or (c - 1.333×c). |
||
Maybe, it could say, "the speed of light in a vacuum is 1.333 times that in water"? [[User:Ethan Lestat|Ethan Lestat]] ([[User talk:Ethan Lestat|talk]]) 15:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC) |
Maybe, it could say, "the speed of light in a vacuum is 1.333 times that in water"? [[User:Ethan Lestat|Ethan Lestat]] ([[User talk:Ethan Lestat|talk]]) 15:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC) |
||
== "how fast light travels" vs "how slowly light travels" == |
|||
In the introduction, I noticed the refractive index is explained to be "how fast light travels" through a material. And yet, as the refractive index of a material increases, the speed of light in the corresponding material decreases. |
|||
Is it then clearer to explain that refractive index is "how slowly light travels" through a material? Put another way, the more refractive index a material has, the slower light passes through it - so can it be interpreted that refractive index measures slowness? |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/2601:80:C97F:EFD0:C901:84BE:3D6A:D71D|2601:80:C97F:EFD0:C901:84BE:3D6A:D71D]] ([[User talk:2601:80:C97F:EFD0:C901:84BE:3D6A:D71D|talk]]) 06:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:54, 23 December 2021
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() | Refractive index was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 3, 2014). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Formulas in "Relative permittivity and permeability" section
The first section gives the conventional formula for magnetic materials. There is no comment on whether this formula can be directly used with complex values or if it needs to be modified.
After this the text relapses to discussing permittivity only. Here complex values seem to be applied directly to the standard formulas. Putting this section in the complex refractivity index may be more appropriate.
After this section some root expressions appear. They do not seem to be in agreement with the application of complex values and need to be questioned.150.227.15.253 (talk) 19:16, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Dependence on temperature of this quantity
Is this quantity influenced by temperature variations or not?--5.2.200.163 (talk) 15:28, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
A possible error in language used when explaining the basic concept
In an example of water used to demonstrate the formula used to calculate the refractive index n=c/v, it says: water has refractive index 1.33, which indicates speed of light in vacuum is 1.33 times 'more than' that in glass. This is a linguistic error since '1.33 times more than' implies 1+1.33 times in the common case. 戴谨承 (talk) 02:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Another possible error in language when explaining the basic concept
The article says, "the refractive index of water is 1.333, meaning that light travels 1.333 times slower in water than in a vacuum. This language may be a bit ambiguous, as there are two interpretations: the speed of light in water may be (c÷1.333) or (c - 1.333×c). Maybe, it could say, "the speed of light in a vacuum is 1.333 times that in water"? Ethan Lestat (talk) 15:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
"how fast light travels" vs "how slowly light travels"
In the introduction, I noticed the refractive index is explained to be "how fast light travels" through a material. And yet, as the refractive index of a material increases, the speed of light in the corresponding material decreases.
Is it then clearer to explain that refractive index is "how slowly light travels" through a material? Put another way, the more refractive index a material has, the slower light passes through it - so can it be interpreted that refractive index measures slowness?
2601:80:C97F:EFD0:C901:84BE:3D6A:D71D (talk) 06:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- B-Class physics articles
- High-importance physics articles
- B-Class physics articles of High-importance
- B-Class glass articles
- High-importance glass articles
- B-Class glass articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Glass articles
- B-Class Materials articles
- Mid-importance Materials articles
- WikiProject Materials articles
- Former good article nominees