Talk:Richard H. Ebright: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:51, 29 January 2022

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Richard H. Ebright article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Science and Academia Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States Start‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Niedrig	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Viruses Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Microbiology Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Niedrig	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Hochladen

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Useful reference

https://ncert.nic.in/ncerts/l/jefp106.pdf

https://bpsscience.weebly.com/uploads/2/2/1/3/2213712/4.2_feynman_-_the_making_of_a_scientist_close_reading_exemplar.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjF-O7o-rPsAhVK4zgGHcfkCdgQFjABegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw01KdBalzxQskueIdpUTkpo

https://eg4.nic.in/jnv/DFILES/EBOOKS/IR/TheMakingofaScientist.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjF-O7o-rPsAhVK4zgGHcfkCdgQFjADegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw3J1YJHjklZ6YoxQT-TsN3n

11:19, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Total WP:OVERCITE

This is the most extreme example of WP:OVERCITE ive ever seen. Im not saying these refs are not useful, but do we really need multiple citations on every sentence, including one which has 11? Perhaps we can cut this down a bit? Bonewah (talk) 19:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it's awful. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that is to be read by humans, not merely a repository of facts and references. Also, a devoted section to his views on COVID-19 is undue WP:RECENTISM. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

.

Why are you people reverting edits? AniiiCo (talk) 12:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 This is the most extreme example of [[WP:OVERCITE]] ive ever seen.  Im not saying these refs are not useful, but do we really need multiple citations on every sentence, including one which has 11?  Perhaps we can cut this down a bit? [[User:Bonewah|Bonewah]] ([[User talk:Bonewah|talk]]) 19:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 :I agree, it's awful. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that is to be read by humans, not merely a repository of facts and references. Also, a devoted section to his views on COVID-19 is undue [[WP:RECENTISM]]. [[User:Animalparty|--Animalparty!]] ([[User talk:Animalparty|talk]]) 20:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
+== . ==
+Why are you people reverting edits? [[User:AniiiCo|AniiiCo]] ([[User talk:AniiiCo|talk]]) 12:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)