Talk:Richard H. Ebright: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Animalparty (talk | contribs) →Total WP:OVERCITE: yep. |
→.: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
This is the most extreme example of [[WP:OVERCITE]] ive ever seen. Im not saying these refs are not useful, but do we really need multiple citations on every sentence, including one which has 11? Perhaps we can cut this down a bit? [[User:Bonewah|Bonewah]] ([[User talk:Bonewah|talk]]) 19:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC) |
This is the most extreme example of [[WP:OVERCITE]] ive ever seen. Im not saying these refs are not useful, but do we really need multiple citations on every sentence, including one which has 11? Perhaps we can cut this down a bit? [[User:Bonewah|Bonewah]] ([[User talk:Bonewah|talk]]) 19:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC) |
||
:I agree, it's awful. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that is to be read by humans, not merely a repository of facts and references. Also, a devoted section to his views on COVID-19 is undue [[WP:RECENTISM]]. [[User:Animalparty|--Animalparty!]] ([[User talk:Animalparty|talk]]) 20:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC) |
:I agree, it's awful. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that is to be read by humans, not merely a repository of facts and references. Also, a devoted section to his views on COVID-19 is undue [[WP:RECENTISM]]. [[User:Animalparty|--Animalparty!]] ([[User talk:Animalparty|talk]]) 20:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC) |
||
== . == |
|||
Why are you people reverting edits? [[User:AniiiCo|AniiiCo]] ([[User talk:AniiiCo|talk]]) 12:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:51, 29 January 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Richard H. Ebright article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1 |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Useful reference
https://ncert.nic.in/ncerts/l/jefp106.pdf
11:19, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Total WP:OVERCITE
This is the most extreme example of WP:OVERCITE ive ever seen. Im not saying these refs are not useful, but do we really need multiple citations on every sentence, including one which has 11? Perhaps we can cut this down a bit? Bonewah (talk) 19:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- I agree, it's awful. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that is to be read by humans, not merely a repository of facts and references. Also, a devoted section to his views on COVID-19 is undue WP:RECENTISM. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
.
Why are you people reverting edits? AniiiCo (talk) 12:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Kategorien:
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class virus articles
- Mid-importance virus articles
- WikiProject Viruses articles
- Start-Class Microbiology articles
- Low-importance Microbiology articles
- WikiProject Microbiology articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs