Jump to content

User:Lou Löwe/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
changed text in section "historical context"
added links in section historical context
Line 15: Line 15:
As the agreement was discussed and formed while the war was still ongoing, the three allied states (France, the Empire of Russia and Great Britain, forming the [[Triple Entente]]) were convinced to succeed in defeating the Ottoman Empire, who had taken the side of the [[Central Powers]].
As the agreement was discussed and formed while the war was still ongoing, the three allied states (France, the Empire of Russia and Great Britain, forming the [[Triple Entente]]) were convinced to succeed in defeating the Ottoman Empire, who had taken the side of the [[Central Powers]].


Before concluding the Sykes-Picot agreement the British had created an alliance with [[Hussein bin Ali, King of Hejaz|Sharif Hussein]], the Emir of Mecca at the time<ref>Rogan E (2015). A century after Sykes-Picot. Link: <nowiki>https://www.thecairoreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/CR19-Rogan.pdf</nowiki> </ref>. In what is known as the Hussein-McMahon correspondence, the British promised Arab independence over large parts of the Ottoman territory (Greater Syria), if the Arabs staged a revolt against the Ottomans.
Parallelly to the Sykes-Picot agreement the British created an alliance with [[Hussein bin Ali, King of Hejaz|Sharif Hussein]], the Emir of Mecca at the time<ref>Rogan E (2015). A century after Sykes-Picot. Link: <nowiki>https://www.thecairoreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/CR19-Rogan.pdf</nowiki> </ref>. In what is known as the [[McMahon–Hussein Correspondence|Hussein-McMahon correspondence]], the British promised Arab independence over large parts of the Ottoman territory (Greater Syria), if the Arabs staged a [[Arab Revolt|revolt]] against the Ottomans.


''The British disrespected their commitment to Sharif Hussein by dividing the promised territory of Greater Syria among themselves and the French. The British also agreed with the Zionists to allow for parts of Palestine to become Jewish land, further ignoring their commitments to Sharif Husse''in<ref>Kramer M (2016). Sykes-Picot and the Zionists. The American Interest. Link: <nowiki>https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/martinkramer/files/sykes-picot_and_the_zionists.pdf</nowiki> </ref>.
''The British disrespected their commitment to Sharif Hussein by dividing the promised territory of Greater Syria among themselves and the French. The British also agreed with the Zionists to allow for parts of Palestine to become Jewish land, further ignoring their commitments to Sharif Husse''in<ref>Kramer M (2016). Sykes-Picot and the Zionists. The American Interest. Link: <nowiki>https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/martinkramer/files/sykes-picot_and_the_zionists.pdf</nowiki> </ref>.

Revision as of 08:36, 3 May 2022

Leiden University, History of the Modern Middle East, 2021-22

I am a student enrolled in the course above, whose assessment entails editing a Simple Wikipedia entry. I will be using the space below to draft this entry.

Sykes-Picot Agreement Project


The Sykes–Picot Agreement /ˈsks piˈk/, officially known as the Asia Minor Agreement, was a secret 1916 agreement between the United Kingdom and France[1]. The main goal for the British and French was to agree upon who received which sphere of influence in Ottoman territories in Southwest Asia. Thereby they wanted to limit competition after the First World War among European powers and secure strategic territories.[2] The agreement was accepted and approved by the Russian Empire and the Kingdom of Italy, who would in turn also benefit territory-wise. The agreement was named after the two diplomats who negotiated the agreement: the British diplomat Mark Sykes and the French diplomat François Georges-Picot. They negotiated during five weeks between the 23rd of November 1915 and on the 3rd of January 1916, before they agreed on a memorandum. The agreement itself was concluded and enforced on the 9th and the 16th of May 1916, when the British and French governments accepted and signed (ratified) the memorandum.

When the agreement was made public it highly embarrassed the French and British and it outraged the concerned countries. This agreement still plays an important role in today’s conflicts and disputes in the respective regions of the Middle East.

Historical context

As the agreement was discussed and formed while the war was still ongoing, the three allied states (France, the Empire of Russia and Great Britain, forming the Triple Entente) were convinced to succeed in defeating the Ottoman Empire, who had taken the side of the Central Powers.

Parallelly to the Sykes-Picot agreement the British created an alliance with Sharif Hussein, the Emir of Mecca at the time[3]. In what is known as the Hussein-McMahon correspondence, the British promised Arab independence over large parts of the Ottoman territory (Greater Syria), if the Arabs staged a revolt against the Ottomans.

The British disrespected their commitment to Sharif Hussein by dividing the promised territory of Greater Syria among themselves and the French. The British also agreed with the Zionists to allow for parts of Palestine to become Jewish land, further ignoring their commitments to Sharif Hussein[4].

Regional division

The Sykes-Picot Agreement map, showing the division of the region. Area A) under French control, area B) under British control

Geographically, the agreement focused primarily on the provinces outside of the Arabian Peninsula. These provinces were divided by a line called the Sykes-Picot line, determining which parts fall under British- and which parts under French influence. The United Kingdom controlled today’s Southern Israel, Palestine, Jordan, and Southern Iran, as well as parts of Haifa, Acre to ensure that the British sill had access to the Mediterranean Sea. France in turn got South-eastern Turkey, northern Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon. In exchange for the Russian Empire’s approval of the treaty, the Russian Foreign minister Serkey Saznov and the French ambassador Maurice Paléologue (concluding the Saznov-Paléologue Agreement) mutually agreed that the Russian Empire would get Western Armenia in addition to the already earlier attributed Constantinople and the Turksih Straits (which had been concluded in the 1915 Constantinople agreement). The Kingdom of Italy also knew about the agreement and was convinced by being promised Southern Anatolia the Saint-Jean-de-Maurienne agreement. Furthermore, the United Kingdom and France agreed that the Holy places and the Palestine region would fall under international administration or be determined in a later settlement.

Consequences

In 2016 the Sykes-Picot marked its 100th year and was discussed in the light of ISIS mentioning it a lot (ISIS released a video in 2014 called "The End of Sykes-Picot").

References

  1. ^ Bilgin, Pinar (2016-05-26). "What is the point about Sykes–Picot?". Global Affairs. 2 (3): 355–359. doi:10.1080/23340460.2016.1236518. ISSN 2334-0460.
  2. ^ Patel, DS (2016). Repartitioning the Sykes-Picot Middle East? Debunking Three Myths. Website: https://www.brandeis.edu/crown/publications/middle-east-briefs/pdfs/101-200/meb103.pdf
  3. ^ Rogan E (2015). A century after Sykes-Picot. Link: https://www.thecairoreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/CR19-Rogan.pdf
  4. ^ Kramer M (2016). Sykes-Picot and the Zionists. The American Interest. Link: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/martinkramer/files/sykes-picot_and_the_zionists.pdf