Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2022 May 27: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* {{anchor|Connecticut State Environmental Conservation Police}}[[Connecticut State Environmental Conservation Police]] <span class="plainlinks">([{{fullurl:Connecticut State Environmental Conservation Police|action=history}} history] · [{{fullurl:Connecticut State Environmental Conservation Police|diff=0}} last edit] · [[Talk:Connecticut State Environmental Conservation Police/Temp|rewrite]])</span> from https://portal.ct.gov/DEEP/Environmental-Conservation-Police/EnCon-Police---History. Changed to a redirect, needs to be purged all the way back to page creation. [[User:Apocheir|Apocheir]] ([[User talk:Apocheir|talk]]) 23:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC) |
* {{anchor|Connecticut State Environmental Conservation Police}}[[Connecticut State Environmental Conservation Police]] <span class="plainlinks">([{{fullurl:Connecticut State Environmental Conservation Police|action=history}} history] · [{{fullurl:Connecticut State Environmental Conservation Police|diff=0}} last edit] · [[Talk:Connecticut State Environmental Conservation Police/Temp|rewrite]])</span> from https://portal.ct.gov/DEEP/Environmental-Conservation-Police/EnCon-Police---History. Changed to a redirect, needs to be purged all the way back to page creation. [[User:Apocheir|Apocheir]] ([[User talk:Apocheir|talk]]) 23:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC) |
||
* {{anchor|Rhode Island Capitol Police}}[[Rhode Island Capitol Police]] <span class="plainlinks">([{{fullurl:Rhode Island Capitol Police|action=history}} history] · [{{fullurl:Rhode Island Capitol Police|diff=0}} last edit] · [[Talk:Rhode Island Capitol Police/Temp|rewrite]])</span> from https://capitolpolice.ri.gov/about. The page text asserts that ''This article includes content from the website of the State of Rhode Island, which is available for re-use in accordance with the terms of the [https://www.ri.gov/policies/copyright/ Copyright Policy of the website].'' The linked copyright page is confusing but does not seem like a Wikipedia-compatible license to me. [[User:Apocheir|Apocheir]] ([[User talk:Apocheir|talk]]) 01:13, 28 May 2022 (UTC) |
* {{anchor|Rhode Island Capitol Police}}[[Rhode Island Capitol Police]] <span class="plainlinks">([{{fullurl:Rhode Island Capitol Police|action=history}} history] · [{{fullurl:Rhode Island Capitol Police|diff=0}} last edit] · [[Talk:Rhode Island Capitol Police/Temp|rewrite]])</span> from https://capitolpolice.ri.gov/about. The page text asserts that ''This article includes content from the website of the State of Rhode Island, which is available for re-use in accordance with the terms of the [https://www.ri.gov/policies/copyright/ Copyright Policy of the website].'' The linked copyright page is confusing but does not seem like a Wikipedia-compatible license to me. [[User:Apocheir|Apocheir]] ([[User talk:Apocheir|talk]]) 01:13, 28 May 2022 (UTC) |
||
**The source is [https://capitolpolice.ri.gov/about]. The relevant part of the "Copyright Policy" of the state government website says: "The compiled information presented on this WWW site is considered public information and may be distributed or copied. However, use of appropriate byline/photo/image credits is requested." It's not written in the terms we're used to but no claim to a copyright is made at all, and there is an unqualified and absolute statement that the contents of the website "may be copied". It's compatible with CC BY-SA 3.0 and explicitly requests rather than requires attribution. More than good enough for me. Given that it's a dry paragraph of entirely factual information about the work of a public agency, if anyone is that concerned about it I would suggest it is simply rewritten. [[User:Ninetyone|ninety]]:[[User talk:Ninetyone|one]] 22:43, 29 May 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:43, 29 May 2022
- China Health and Nutrition Survey (history · last edit · rewrite) from .Jacquesparker0 (talk) 19:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
- San Diego County Probation Department (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/sdc/probation/history.html. Some close paraphrasing but largely a direct quote of the source. Remainder of article may be an issue too due to past COI problems. Apocheir (talk) 22:32, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
- Glyphosate-based herbicides (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://link.springer.com/article/10.2165/00139709-200423030-00003. This source was first cited by Seraphim System in 2018. Diff of Glyphosate-based herbicides. However some subsequent content was cited to Bradberry in subsequent edits. Listing here to give interested editors an opportunity to re-write the section. The problem is in the section about toxicity in humans. — Diannaa (talk) 22:38, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
- Connecticut State Environmental Conservation Police (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://portal.ct.gov/DEEP/Environmental-Conservation-Police/EnCon-Police---History. Changed to a redirect, needs to be purged all the way back to page creation. Apocheir (talk) 23:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
- Rhode Island Capitol Police (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://capitolpolice.ri.gov/about. The page text asserts that This article includes content from the website of the State of Rhode Island, which is available for re-use in accordance with the terms of the Copyright Policy of the website. The linked copyright page is confusing but does not seem like a Wikipedia-compatible license to me. Apocheir (talk) 01:13, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
- The source is [1]. The relevant part of the "Copyright Policy" of the state government website says: "The compiled information presented on this WWW site is considered public information and may be distributed or copied. However, use of appropriate byline/photo/image credits is requested." It's not written in the terms we're used to but no claim to a copyright is made at all, and there is an unqualified and absolute statement that the contents of the website "may be copied". It's compatible with CC BY-SA 3.0 and explicitly requests rather than requires attribution. More than good enough for me. Given that it's a dry paragraph of entirely factual information about the work of a public agency, if anyone is that concerned about it I would suggest it is simply rewritten. ninety:one 22:43, 29 May 2022 (UTC)