Jump to content

List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 175: Difference between revisions

Coordinates: 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
Line 162: Line 162:
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[New York Surrogate's Court|N.Y. Sur. Ct.]]
| [[New York Surrogate's Court|N.Y. Cnty. Sur. Ct.]]
| dismissed for want of jurisdiction
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''Anglo-Californian Bank v. United States''
| ''Anglo-Californian Bank v. United States''
Line 173: Line 173:
| dismissed
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''De la Vergne Refrigerating Mach. Co. v. German Sav. Inst.''
| ''De la Vergne R.M. Co. v. German Sav. Inst.''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95104/de-la-vergne-co-v-german-savings-inst 40 (1899)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95104/de-la-vergne-co-v-german-savings-inst 40 (1899)]
| Brown
| Brown
Line 189: Line 189:
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Real de Dolores del Oro v. United States''
| ''Real de Dolores v. United States''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95106/real-de-dolores-del-oro-v-united-states 71 (1899)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95106/real-de-dolores-del-oro-v-united-states 71 (1899)]
| Brown
| Brown
Line 205: Line 205:
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''[[The Hartford|Hartford Fire Ins. Co.]] v. [[Milwaukee Road|Chicago, M. & S.P. Ry. Co.]]''
| ''[[The Hartford|Hartford Fire Ins. Co.]] v. [[Milwaukee Road|Chicago, et al. Ry. Co.]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95108/hartford-ins-co-v-chicago-c-railway 91 (1899)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95108/hartford-ins-co-v-chicago-c-railway 91 (1899)]
| Gray
| Gray
Line 213: Line 213:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Bienville Water Supply Co. v. [[Mobile, Alabama|City of Mobile]]''
| ''Bienville W.S. Co. v. [[Mobile, Alabama|City of Mobile]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95109/bienville-water-supply-co-v-mobile 109 (1899)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95109/bienville-water-supply-co-v-mobile 109 (1899)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
Line 235: Line 235:
| none
| none
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit|5th Cir.]]
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit|5th Cir.]]
| affirmed as modified
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Brady v. Daly''
| ''Brady v. Daly''
Line 251: Line 251:
| none
| none
| [[Arizona Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Ariz.]]
| [[Arizona Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Ariz.]]
| affirmed as modified
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Brown v. [[New Jersey]]''
| ''Brown v. [[New Jersey]]''
Line 258: Line 258:
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Oyer and terminer|N.J. Ct. Oy. & Term.]]
| [[Oyer and terminer|N.J.O. & T.]]
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
Line 285: Line 285:
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United States''
| ''Addyston P. & S. Co. v. United States''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95118/addyston-pipe-steel-co-v-united-states 211 (1899)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95118/addyston-pipe-steel-co-v-united-states 211 (1899)]
| Peckham
| Peckham
Line 309: Line 309:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Arkansas Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Madden''
| ''Arkansas B. & L. Ass'n v. Madden''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95121/arkansas-building-and-loan-assn-v-madden 269 (1899)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95121/arkansas-building-and-loan-assn-v-madden 269 (1899)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
Line 315: Line 315:
| none
| none
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.W.D. Tex.]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.W.D. Tex.]]
| affirmed as modified
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Seeberger v. McCormick''
| ''Seeberger v. McCormick''
Line 323: Line 323:
| none
| none
| [[Illinois Supreme Court|Ill.]]
| [[Illinois Supreme Court|Ill.]]
| dismissed for want of jurisdiction
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''Malony v. Adsit''
| ''Malony v. Adsit''
Line 363: Line 363:
| Harlan
| Harlan
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit|1st Cir.]]
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit|1st Cir.]]
| certification
| [[remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]]
|-
|-
| ''Tullis v. [[Lake Erie and Western Railroad|Lake Erie & W.R.R. Co.]]''
| ''Tullis v. [[Lake Erie and Western Railroad|Lake Erie & W.R.R. Co.]]''
Line 371: Line 371:
| none
| none
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit|7th Cir.]]
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit|7th Cir.]]
| certification
| [[remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]]
|-
|-
| ''The Pedro''
| ''The Pedro''
Line 405: Line 405:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Abbott v. Tacoma Bank of Com.''
| ''Abbott v. Tacoma Bank''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95133/abbott-v-tacoma-bank-of-commerce 409 (1899)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95133/abbott-v-tacoma-bank-of-commerce 409 (1899)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
Line 421: Line 421:
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''La Abra Silver Mining Co. v. United States''
| ''La Abra S.M. Co. v. United States''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95135/la-abra-silver-mining-co-v-united-states 423 (1899)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95135/la-abra-silver-mining-co-v-united-states 423 (1899)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
Line 445: Line 445:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Bardes v. Hawarden First Nat'l Bank''
| ''Bardes v. Hawarden F. Nat'l Bank''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95138/bardes-v-hawarden-first-nat-bank 526 (1899)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95138/bardes-v-hawarden-first-nat-bank 526 (1899)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
Line 485: Line 485:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Blackburn v. Portland Gold Mining Co.''
| ''Blackburn v. Portland G.M. Co.''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95143/blackburn-v-portland-gold-mining-co 571 (1900)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95143/blackburn-v-portland-gold-mining-co 571 (1900)]
| Shiras
| Shiras
Line 501: Line 501:
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Canada Sugar Refin. Co. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am.''
| ''Canada S.R. Co. v. Insurance Co. of N.A.''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95145/canada-sugar-refining-co-v-insurance-co-of-north-america 609 (1900)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95145/canada-sugar-refining-co-v-insurance-co-of-north-america 609 (1900)]
| Shiras
| Shiras
Line 509: Line 509:
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. [[Illinois]]''
| ''Keokuk & H.B. Co. v. [[Illinois]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95146/keokuk-hamilton-bridge-co-v-illinois 626 (1900)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95146/keokuk-hamilton-bridge-co-v-illinois 626 (1900)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
Line 525: Line 525:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Telluride Power Transmission Co. v. [[Utah Division (D&RGW)|Rio Grande W. Ry. Co.]]''
| ''Telluride P.T. Co. v. [[Utah Division (D&RGW)|Rio Grande W. Ry. Co.]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95148/telluride-power-co-v-rio-grande-c-ry 639 (1900)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95148/telluride-power-co-v-rio-grande-c-ry 639 (1900)]
| Brown
| Brown
Line 531: Line 531:
| none
| none
| [[Utah Supreme Court|Utah]]
| [[Utah Supreme Court|Utah]]
| dismissed for want of jurisdiction
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''[[Louisville & Nashville Railroad|Louisville & N.R.R. Co.]] v. Behlmer''
| ''[[Louisville & Nashville Railroad|Louisville & N.R.R. Co.]] v. Behlmer''

Revision as of 01:44, 13 June 2022

Supreme Court of the United States
Map
38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789; 235 years ago (1789-03-04)
LocationWashington, D.C.
Coordinates38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized byConstitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1
Judge term lengthlife tenure, subject to impeachment and removal
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Websitesupremecourt.gov

This is a list of cases reported in volume 175 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1899 and 1900.

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 175 U.S.

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[1] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in volume 175 were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:

Portrait Justice Office Home State Succeeded Date confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
Melville Fuller Chief Justice Illinois Morrison Waite July 20, 1888
(41–20)
October 8, 1888

July 4, 1910
(Died)
John Marshall Harlan Associate Justice Kentucky David Davis November 29, 1877
(Acclamation)
December 10, 1877

October 14, 1911
(Died)
Horace Gray Associate Justice Massachusetts Nathan Clifford December 20, 1881
(51–5)
January 9, 1882

September 15, 1902
(Died)
David Josiah Brewer Associate Justice Kansas Stanley Matthews December 18, 1889
(53–11)
January 6, 1890

March 28, 1910
(Died)
Henry Billings Brown Associate Justice Michigan Samuel Freeman Miller December 29, 1890
(Acclamation)
January 5, 1891

May 28, 1906
(Retired)
George Shiras Jr. Associate Justice Pennsylvania Joseph P. Bradley July 26, 1892
(Acclamation)
October 10, 1892

February 23, 1903
(Retired)
Edward Douglass White Associate Justice Louisiana Samuel Blatchford February 19, 1894
(Acclamation)
March 12, 1894

December 18, 1910
(Continued as chief justice)
Rufus W. Peckham Associate Justice New York Howell Edmunds Jackson December 9, 1895
(Acclamation)
January 6, 1896

October 24, 1909
(Died)
Joseph McKenna Associate Justice California Stephen Johnson Field January 21, 1898
(Acclamation)
January 26, 1898

January 5, 1925
(Retired)

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in volume 175 U.S.

Case Name Page & year Opinion of the Court Concurring opinion(s) Dissenting opinion(s) Lower Court Disposition of case
Jones v. Meehan 1 (1899) Gray none none C.C.D. Minn. affirmed
Scudder v. Comptroller 32 (1899) Gray none none N.Y. Cnty. Sur. Ct. dismissed
Anglo-Californian Bank v. United States 37 (1899) Fuller none none 9th Cir. dismissed
De la Vergne R.M. Co. v. German Sav. Inst. 40 (1899) Brown none none 8th Cir. reversed
United States v. Conway 60 (1899) Brown none none Ct. Priv. Land Cl. reversed
Real de Dolores v. United States 71 (1899) Brown none none Ct. Priv. Land Cl. affirmed
Ainsa v. New Mexico & A.R.R. Co. 76 (1899) Gray none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Ariz. reversed
Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Chicago, et al. Ry. Co. 91 (1899) Gray none none 8th Cir. affirmed
Bienville W.S. Co. v. City of Mobile 109 (1899) Fuller none none C.C.S.D. Ala. affirmed
In re Blake 114 (1899) Fuller none none Tenn. mandamus denied
City of New Orleans v. Warner 120 (1899) Brown none none 5th Cir. affirmed
Brady v. Daly 148 (1899) Peckham none none 2d Cir. affirmed
Simms v. Simms 162 (1899) Gray none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Ariz. affirmed
Brown v. New Jersey 172 (1899) Brewer none none N.J.O. & T. affirmed
Coudert v. United States 178 (1899) McKenna none none 2d Cir. affirmed
Markuson v. Boucher 184 (1899) McKenna none none D.N.D. affirmed
The New York 187 (1899) Brown none none 6th Cir. reversed
Addyston P. & S. Co. v. United States 211 (1899) Peckham none none 6th Cir. affirmed
Hays v. United States 248 (1899) Brown none none Ct. Priv. Land Cl. affirmed
Bolles v. Outing Co. 262 (1899) Brown none none 2d Cir. affirmed
Arkansas B. & L. Ass'n v. Madden 269 (1899) Fuller none none C.C.W.D. Tex. affirmed
Seeberger v. McCormick 274 (1899) Shiras none none Ill. dismissed
Malony v. Adsit 281 (1899) Shiras none none D. Alaska affirmed
Bradfield v. Roberts 291 (1899) Peckham none none D.C. Cir. affirmed
Niles v. Cedar Point Club 300 (1899) Brewer none none 6th Cir. affirmed
City of New Orleans v. Stemple 309 (1899) Brewer none none C.C.E.D. La. reversed
New E.R.R. Co. v. Conroy 323 (1899) Shiras none Harlan 1st Cir. certification
Tullis v. Lake Erie & W.R.R. Co. 348 (1899) Fuller none none 7th Cir. certification
The Pedro 354 (1899) Fuller none White S.D. Fla. affirmed
The Guido 382 (1899) Fuller none none S.D. Fla. affirmed
The S.S. Buena Ventura 384 (1899) Peckham none none S.D. Fla. reversed
King v. Cross 396 (1899) White none none R.I. affirmed
Abbott v. Tacoma Bank 409 (1899) Harlan none none Wash. affirmed
Hamilton v. Rathbone 414 (1899) Brown none none D.C. Cir. reversed
La Abra S.M. Co. v. United States 423 (1899) Harlan none none Ct. Cl. affirmed
United States v. Pena 500 (1899) Brewer none none Ct. Priv. Land Cl. reversed
United States v. Chavez 509 (1899) McKenna none none Ct. Priv. Land Cl. affirmed
Bardes v. Hawarden F. Nat'l Bank 526 (1899) Fuller none none N.D. Iowa dismissed
Cumming v. Richmond Cnty. 528 (1899) Harlan none none Ga. Super. Ct. affirmed
Peabody v. United States 546 (1899) Peckham none none Ct. Priv. Land Cl. affirmed
Chavez v. United States 552 (1900) Peckham none none Ct. Priv. Land Cl. affirmed
Northern P.R.R. Co. v. Amacker 564 (1900) Brewer none none 9th Cir. affirmed
Blackburn v. Portland G.M. Co. 571 (1900) Shiras none none C.C.D. Colo. affirmed
United States v. Gleason 588 (1900) Shiras none none Ct. Cl. reversed
Canada S.R. Co. v. Insurance Co. of N.A. 609 (1900) Shiras none none 2d Cir. reversed
Keokuk & H.B. Co. v. Illinois 626 (1900) Fuller none none Ill. affirmed
Whitcomb v. Smithson 635 (1900) Fuller none none Minn. affirmed
Telluride P.T. Co. v. Rio Grande W. Ry. Co. 639 (1900) Brown none none Utah dismissed
Louisville & N.R.R. Co. v. Behlmer 648 (1900) White none none 4th Cir. reversed
The Paquete Habana 677 (1899) Gray none Fuller S.D. Fla. reversed

Notes and references

  1. ^ "Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. Retrieved April 7, 2021.

See also