Comparison of ICBMs: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Put a neccessary space to a number between braces for better visuals |
m Fix Linter obsolete tag errors. |
||
Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
|12,000 km |
|12,000 km |
||
|49,000 kg |
|49,000 kg |
||
|4 |
|4 {{mono|x}} 300 kt |
||
|Active |
|Active |
||
|2007 |
|2007 |
||
Line 196: | Line 196: | ||
|10,000 km |
|10,000 km |
||
|36,800 kg |
|36,800 kg |
||
|6 |
|6 {{mono|x}} 150 kt |
||
|Active |
|Active |
||
|2005 |
|2005 |
||
Line 326: | Line 326: | ||
|13,000 km |
|13,000 km |
||
|35,300 kg |
|35,300 kg |
||
|3 |
|3 {{mono|x}} 300 kt of TNT |
||
<!-- |(US$) 7 mil --> |
<!-- |(US$) 7 mil --> |
||
|Active |
|Active |
||
Line 340: | Line 340: | ||
|7,400 km |
|7,400 km |
||
|33,142 kg |
|33,142 kg |
||
|8 |
|8 {{mono|x}} 100 kt |
||
|Inactive |
|Inactive |
||
|1977 |
|1977 |
||
Line 418: | Line 418: | ||
|14,000 km |
|14,000 km |
||
|96,750 kg |
|96,750 kg |
||
|10 |
|10 {{mono|x}} 300 kt |
||
|Inactive |
|Inactive |
||
|1983 |
|1983 |
||
Line 444: | Line 444: | ||
|11,300 km+ |
|11,300 km+ |
||
|58,500 kg |
|58,500 kg |
||
|8 |
|8 {{mono|x}} 475 kt or 12 {{mono|c}} 100 kt |
||
<!-- |(US$) 30.9 mil --> |
<!-- |(US$) 30.9 mil --> |
||
|Active |
|Active |
||
Line 458: | Line 458: | ||
|5,000 km |
|5,000 km |
||
|36,000 kg |
|36,000 kg |
||
|6 |
|6 {{mono| x }} 150 kt |
||
|Inactive |
|Inactive |
||
|1985 |
|1985 |
||
Line 471: | Line 471: | ||
|6,000 km |
|6,000 km |
||
|35,000 kg |
|35,000 kg |
||
|6 |
|6{{mono| x }}110 kt TNT |
||
|Active |
|Active |
||
|1986 |
|1986 |
||
Line 484: | Line 484: | ||
|10,000 km (or more) |
|10,000 km (or more) |
||
|52,000 kg |
|52,000 kg |
||
|6 to 10 |
|6 to 10 {{mono|x}} 100 kt of TNT |
||
|Active |
|Active |
||
|2006 |
|2006 |
||
Line 497: | Line 497: | ||
|10,000 km (or more) |
|10,000 km (or more) |
||
|52,000 kg |
|52,000 kg |
||
|6 to 10 |
|6 to 10 {{mono|x}} 150kt of TNT (new [[Tête nucléaire océanique]]) |
||
|Under Development |
|Under Development |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 710: | Line 710: | ||
|Yes |
|Yes |
||
|Road-mobile TEL |
|Road-mobile TEL |
||
|N/A<br /><ref group="Note">Here {{cite web|url=http://www.wisconsinproject.org/countries/israel/israel-aims.html |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2014-04-10 |url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141003212249/http://www.wisconsinproject.org/countries/israel/israel-aims.html |archive-date=2014-10-03 }} it says an Israeli official indicated that "''A 1,000-kilometer missile should come within 50 meters of its target.''" <p>Israel may still lack advanced technology to improve the Jericho's guidance. In 1992 a Defense Department study, the Militarily Critical Technology List, found that Israel lacked a number of specialized devices to make and inspect parts and assemblies for gyroscopes and integrated sensor systems though this finding is over twenty years out of date.</ref> |
|N/A<br /><ref group="Note">Here {{cite web|url=http://www.wisconsinproject.org/countries/israel/israel-aims.html |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2014-04-10 |url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141003212249/http://www.wisconsinproject.org/countries/israel/israel-aims.html |archive-date=2014-10-03 }} it says an Israeli official indicated that "''A 1,000-kilometer missile should come within 50 meters of its target.''" <p>Israel may still lack advanced technology to improve the Jericho's guidance. In 1992 a Defense Department study, the Militarily Critical Technology List, found that Israel lacked a number of specialized devices to make and inspect parts and assemblies for gyroscopes and integrated sensor systems though this finding is over twenty years out of date.</p></ref> |
||
|- style="background:khaki;" |
|- style="background:khaki;" |
||
|54 |
|54 |
Revision as of 15:06, 24 June 2022
This is a comparison list of intercontinental ballistic missiles developed by various countries.
ICBMs by country
Legend for launch system status in below table: Operational Under development Inactive Unknown status
S No. | Name | Operator | Manufacturer | Max range | Missile mass | Warhead/payload[clarification needed] | Status | First flight | MIRV | Mobility | Accuracy (CEP) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | RS-28 Sarmat | Russland | State Rocket Center Makeyev | 18,000 km | 208.1 tonnes[1][2] | 10,000 kg[2] | Active | 2018 | Yes | Silo | 10 m[3] |
2 | BZhRK Barguzin | Russland | Votkinsk | 12,600 km | 45-50 tonnes | K.A. | Under development | K.A. | Yes | Railroad | K.A. |
3 | R-36M2 Voevoda[Note 1] | USSR | Yuzhny Machine-Building Plant | 11,000 km (or 16,000 km with a single warhead)[4] | 211,400 kg[4] | 10 x 800 kt / 8730 kg[4] | Active | 1986 | Yes | Silo | 220 m |
4 | UR-100N UTTKh | USSR | Khrunichev Machine-Building Plant | 10,000 km | 105,600 kg | 6 x 550 kt / 4350 kg | Active | 1977[5] | Yes | Silo | K.A. |
5 | RT-2PM Topol | USSR | Votkinsk Machine Building Plant | 10,500 km | 45,100 kg | 800 kt | Active | 1985 | No | Road-mobile TEL | 200 m |
6 | RT-2PM2 Topol-M | Russland | Votkinsk Machine Building Plant | 11,000 km | 47,200 kg | 800 kt | Active | 1994 | Yes | Silo, road-mobile TEL | 200 m |
7 | RS-24 | Russland | Votkinsk Machine Building Plant | 12,000 km | 49,000 kg | 4 x 300 kt | Active | 2007 | Yes | Silo, road-mobile TEL | 150 m |
8 | R-29R | Russland | State Rocket Center Makeyev | 6,500 km | 35,300 kg | 1650 kg | Active | K.A. | K.A. | Delta III Submarine | K.A. |
9 | R-29RK | Russland | State Rocket Center Makayev | 6,500 km | 34,388 kg | 1650 kg | Active | K.A. | Yes | Delta III Submarine | K.A. |
10 | R-29RL | Russland | State Rocket Center Makeyev | 9,000 km | 35,300 kg | 1650 kg | Active | K.A. | Yes | Delta III Submarine | K.A. |
11 | R-29RM | Russland | Krasnoyarsk Machine-Building Plant | 8,300 km | 40,300 kg | 2800 kg | Active | K.A. | Yes | Delta IV Submarine | K.A. |
12 | R-29RMU Sineva | Russland | Krasnoyarsk Machine-Building Plant | 11,547 km | 40,300 kg | K.A. | Active | 2004 | Yes (6) | Delta IV Submarine | K.A. |
13 | R-29RMU2 Layner | Russland | Krasnoyarsk Machine-Building Plant | 11,000 km+ | 40,000 kg | K.A. | Active | 2011 | Yes (12) | Delta IV Submarine | K.A. |
14 | RSM-56 Bulava | Russland | Votkinsk Plant State Production Association | 10,000 km | 36,800 kg | 6 x 150 kt | Active | 2005 | Yes | Borei class submarine | 200 m |
15 | R-7 Semyorka[Note 2] | USSR | Soviet Academy of Sciences | 12,000 km | 280,000 kg | 2.9 Mt of TNT | Inactive | 1959 | No | Launch pad | 5,000 m |
16 | R-16 | USSR | Khartron | 11,000 km | 141,000 kg | 5 Mt | Inactive | 1961 | No | Silo | 2,700 m |
17 | R-9 Desna | USSR | NPO Energomash Khartron |
11,000 km | K.A. | 2.3 Mt | Inactive | 1961 | No | Silo | 2,000 m |
18 | UR-100 | USSR | Khrunichev Machine-Building Plant | 10,600 km | 41,400 kg | 1 Mt | Inactive | 1966 | No | Silo | K.A. |
19 | RT-2 | USSR | 10,186 km | 34,000 kg | 600 kt | Inactive | 1968 | No | Silo | ||
20 | MR-UR-100 Sotka | USSR | Yuzhny Machine-Building Plant | 10,250 km | 71,200 kg | 4×0.4 Mt | Inactive | 1971 | Yes | Silo | |
21 | RT-23 Molodets | USSR | Yuzhnoye Design Bureau | 10,450 km | 104,500 kg | 10 x 550 kT | Inactive | 1986 | Yes (10 ) | Silo, Railroad | 150–250 m |
22 | R-29 | USSR | State Rocket Center Makayev | 7,700 km | Inactive | 1969 | No | Delta I submarine | |||
23 | R-39 Rif | USSR | Zlatoust Machine-Building Plant | 8,300 km | 84,000 kg | 10 x 100–200 kT | Inactive | 1983 | Yes | Typhoon class submarine | K.A. |
24 | Minuteman III | US | Boeing | 13,000 km | 35,300 kg | 3 x 300 kt of TNT | Active | 1970 | Yes | Silo | 200 m |
25 | Trident | US | Lockheed Martin Space Systems | 7,400 km | 33,142 kg | 8 x 100 kt | Inactive | 1977 | Yes | Ohio-class submarine | 380 m < |
26 | Atlas | US | Consolidated Vultee Aircraft (Convair) | 14,500 km | Inactive | 1959 | No | ||||
27 | Titan I | US | Glenn L. Martin Company | 10,200 km | 105,140 kg | 3.75 Mt | Inactive | 1959 | No | Silo | |
28 | Titan II | US | Glenn L. Martin Company | 15,000 km | 154,000 kg | 9 Mt | Inactive | 1962 | No | Silo | |
29 | Minuteman I | US | Boeing | 1.2 Mt | Inactive | 1961 | No | Silo | 200 m | ||
30 | Minuteman II | US | Boeing | 1.2 Mt | Inactive | 1965 | No | Silo | |||
31 | LGM-118 Peacekeeper | US | Boeing, Martin Marietta, TRW, | 14,000 km | 96,750 kg | 10 x 300 kt | Inactive | 1983 | Yes | Silo | 120 m |
32 | Midgetman | US | Martin Marietta | 11,000 km | 13,600 kg | 475 kT | Inactive | 1992 | No | Small ICBM Hard Mobile Launcher[6] | 90 m |
33 | Trident II | United Kingdom and United States | Lockheed Martin Space Systems | 11,300 km+ | 58,500 kg | 8 x 475 kt or 12 c 100 kt | Active | 1987 | Yes | Ohio-class and Vanguard-class submarines |
90–120 m |
34 | M4 | Frankreich | EADS SPACE Transportation | 5,000 km | 36,000 kg | 6 x 150 kt | Inactive | 1985 | Yes | Le Redoutable class submarine | |
35 | M45 | Frankreich | Aérospatiale/EADS SPACE Transportation | 6,000 km | 35,000 kg | 6 x 110 kt TNT | Active | 1986 | Yes | Triomphant class submarine | 350 m |
36 | M51.1 | Frankreich | EADS Astrium Space Transportation | 10,000 km (or more) | 52,000 kg | 6 to 10 x 100 kt of TNT | Active | 2006 | Yes | Triomphant class submarine | |
37 | M51.2 | Frankreich | EADS Astrium Space Transportation | 10,000 km (or more) | 52,000 kg | 6 to 10 x 150kt of TNT (new Tête nucléaire océanique) | Under Development | Yes | Triomphant class submarine | ||
38 | DF-5 | China | China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology | 12,000 km | 183,000 kg | 5 Mt | Active | 1971 | No | 1,000 m | |
39 | DF-5A | China | China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology | 15,000 km | 183,000 kg | 4 Mt | Active | 1983 | Yes (Speculated) | Silo | 1,000 m |
40 | DF-5B | China | China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology | 15,000 km | 183,000 kg | 3 to 8 | Active | 2015 | Yes | Silo | |
41 | DF-4 | China | Factory 211 (Capital Astronautics Co.) | 7,000 km | 82,000 kg | 3.3 Mt | Active | 1975 | Yes (Speculated) |
Silo | 1,500 m |
42 | DF-31 | China | Academy of Rocket Motors Technology (ARMT) | 8,000 km | 42,000 kg | 1 Mt | Active | 1999 (Reported) |
No | Road-mobile TEL | |
43 | DF-31A | China | Academy of Rocket Motors Technology (ARMT) | 12,000 km | 42,000 kg | 3[clarification needed] | Active | Yes | Road-mobile TEL | ||
44 | DF-41 | China | China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology | 12,000 km-15,000km | 10[clarification needed] | Active | 2012[7] | Yes | Road-mobile TEL/ Rail-mobile | ||
45 | JL-2 | China | Factory 307 (Nanjing Dawn Group) | ~7200km | 42,000 kg | 3-6 | Active | 2001 (Believed) |
Yes | Type 094 Jin class submarine | |
46 | JL-3 | China | 12,000km+ | Under development | Yes | Type 096 submarineType 094A (speculated) | |||||
47 | Agni-V | Indien | Defence Research and Development Organisation | 5,500 – 8,000 km | 50,000 kg | 3-6 | Active | 2012 | Yes | Road mobile TEL, Rail Mobile | <10 m (single digit accuracy) [8] |
48 | Agni-VI | Indien | Defence Research and Development Organisation | 11,000 – 12,000 km | 55,000 - 70,000 kg | 10 | Under development | 2022 | Yes | Road mobile TEL, Rail Mobile | <10 m (single digit accuracy) [9] |
49 | Surya | Indien | Defence Research and Development Organisation | 12,000 – 16,000 km | 55,000 - 70,000 kg | 10-15 | Project existence unknown | 2026 | Yes | Road mobile TEL, Rail Mobile | <15 m (single digit accuracy) |
50 | KN-08 | North Korea | 1,500 – 12,000 km (Speculated)[10] |
Inactive (Reportedly)[11] |
2012 | No | Silo | ||||
51 | Hwasong-14 | North Korea | 6,700 – 10,000 km [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] |
33,800 kg[19] | 500 kg[20] | Under development | 2017 | No | Road-mobile TEL | K.A. | |
52 | Hwasong-15 | North Korea | 13,000 km [21] |
72,000 kg[22] | 1,000 kg[23] | Under development | 2017 | Maybe[24][25][26][27] | Road-mobile TEL | K.A. | |
53 | Jericho III | Israel | Israel Aerospace Industries | 4,800 – 11,500 km (Speculated) |
30,000 kg | 750 kg single or MIRVed (Suspected)[28] |
Active (Suspected) |
2008 | Yes | Road-mobile TEL | N/A [Note 3] |
54 | LGM-35 Sentinel | Vereinigte Staaten | Northrop Grumman | Under Development | Yes | Silo |
See also
Notes
- ^ This is world's heaviest ICBM with a throw-weight of 8,800 kg.
- ^ The world's first intercontinental ballistic missile.
- ^ Here "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2014-10-03. Retrieved 2014-04-10.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) it says an Israeli official indicated that "A 1,000-kilometer missile should come within 50 meters of its target."Israel may still lack advanced technology to improve the Jericho's guidance. In 1992 a Defense Department study, the Militarily Critical Technology List, found that Israel lacked a number of specialized devices to make and inspect parts and assemblies for gyroscopes and integrated sensor systems though this finding is over twenty years out of date.
References
- ^ Podvig, Pavel (2016-05-09). "Sarmat to be deployed in Uzhur and Dombarovskiy". Russian Strategic Nuclear Forces.
- ^ a b "RS-28 Sarmat". Missile Threat. Retrieved 2021-01-06.
- ^ "RS-28 Sarmat Intercontinental Ballistic Missile | Military-Today.com". www.military-today.com. Retrieved 2021-01-06.
- ^ a b c "Стратегический ракетный комплекс Р-36М2 Воевода (15П018М) с МБР 15А18М | Ракетная техника". rbase.new-factoria.ru. Retrieved 2016-05-20.
- ^ "UR-100N family". www.russianspaceweb.com. Retrieved 2016-05-20.
- ^ "Midgetman / Small ICBM – United States Nuclear Forces". Fas.org. Retrieved 2013-01-30.
- ^ "China test fires new long-range missile". August 15, 2012.
- ^ "Agni-V vital: Tessy Thomas". The Hindu. 2013-10-02. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 2016-07-16.
- ^ "Agni-VI vital: INDIAN DEFENCE NEWS". The Hindu. 2015-01-06. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 2016-07-16.
- ^ Ballistic and Cruise Missile Threat (Report). Defense Intelligence Ballistic Missile Analysis Committee. June 2017. p. 29. NASIC-1031-0985-17. Retrieved 16 July 2017.
- ^ "Missili nordcoreani, parla l'ingegnere tedesco..." Difesa Online. November 27, 2017.
- ^ "North Korea Appears to Launch Missile with 6,700 km Range". 3 July 2017.
- ^ "N. Korea likely to have operational ICBM capable of striking U.S. West Coast next year or two: U.S. expert".
- ^ Panda, Ankit. "Why Is Russia Denying That North Korea Launched an ICBM?". thediplomat.com.
- ^ "What is True and Not True About North Korea's Hwasong-14 ICBM: A Technical Evaluation | 38 North: Informed Analysis of North Korea". 38 North. July 10, 2017.
- ^ "Arms Control Wonk : North Korea's ICBM: Hwasong-14". armscontrolwonk.libsyn.com.
- ^ "Arms Control Wonk : North Korea's New Missiles". armscontrolwonk.libsyn.com.
- ^ "North Korean ICBM Appears Able to Reach Major US Cities | Union of Concerned Scientists". www.ucsusa.org.
- ^ "North Korea's newest nuclear HS-14 ICBM". www.b14643.de.
- ^ "North Korea's Third ICBM Launch | 38 North: Informed Analysis of North Korea". 38 North. November 29, 2017.
- ^ "North Korea's Longest Missile Test Yet". All Things Nuclear. November 28, 2017.
- ^ "Hwasong-15 ICBM". www.b14643.de.
- ^ "The New Hwasong-15 ICBM: A Significant Improvement That May be Ready as Early as 2018 | 38 North: Informed Analysis of North Korea". 38 North. November 30, 2017.
- ^ http://www.newsweek.com/north-koreas-missile-could-carry-multiple-warheads-strike-us-mainland-728078 [dead link]
- ^ http://m.yna.co.kr/mob2/en/contents_en.jsp?cid=AEN20171180001353815&site=0400000000&mobile
- ^ https://asia.nikkoi.com/Spotlight/North-Korea-crisis/North-Korea-s-new-missile-may-herald-multiple-warhead-payloads?n_cid=NARAN1501[permanent dead link]
- ^ "Blog". The National Interest.
- ^ http://missilethreat.com/missiles/jericho-123/#fnref-3809-1 Archived 2013-01-21 at the Wayback Machine