Talk:Nuclear Threat Initiative: Difference between revisions
Assessment (C/Low): Effective Altruism, Organizations, +banner shell (Rater) |
→Major Updates to Page: new section |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
: I agree, the article uses some puffery language and goes into a level of detail with no citations that leads one to believe it must be written by a person close to the subject. I'm going to add the COI banner and try to remove a lot of the puffery and uncited information later this week. [[User:Apathyash|Apathyash]] ([[User talk:Apathyash|talk]]) 01:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
: I agree, the article uses some puffery language and goes into a level of detail with no citations that leads one to believe it must be written by a person close to the subject. I'm going to add the COI banner and try to remove a lot of the puffery and uncited information later this week. [[User:Apathyash|Apathyash]] ([[User talk:Apathyash|talk]]) 01:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
== Major Updates to Page == |
|||
I made a major update to this page. Fixed the neutrality issues, updated the very outdated leadership and work sections, cited all claims and removed unverifiable info from old page versions. [[User:Theknittingfrog|Theknittingfrog]] ([[User talk:Theknittingfrog|talk]]) 15:29, 5 July 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:29, 5 July 2022
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
NTI
There is also NewTech InfoSystems, they make CD Burning software, but NTI just goes here..
I removed the "quote" about the "embarassed" official saying that the State Department "needed the money" as I could not locate it in the reference cited. --Jon (talk) 15:07, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Citations & Potential COI
There's a lot of sections of this article that need more citations. Also, there may be a slight conflict of interest issue, as one username of one of the editors has the initials of the organization. In addition, the page of the related World Institute for Nuclear Security has major COI issues, so there may be some spillover. Sandtalon (talk) 22:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- I agree, the article uses some puffery language and goes into a level of detail with no citations that leads one to believe it must be written by a person close to the subject. I'm going to add the COI banner and try to remove a lot of the puffery and uncited information later this week. Apathyash (talk) 01:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Major Updates to Page
I made a major update to this page. Fixed the neutrality issues, updated the very outdated leadership and work sections, cited all claims and removed unverifiable info from old page versions. Theknittingfrog (talk) 15:29, 5 July 2022 (UTC)