Jump to content

Talk:Universally unique identifier: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bend1010 (talk | contribs)
Add "New Versions" section
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Universally unique identifier/Archive 1) (bot
Line 14: Line 14:
|archive = Talk:Universally unique identifier/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:Universally unique identifier/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}

== DOCTYPE Puzzle ==

Readers of this page may be interested in thw following discussion:
* [[Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing#DOCTYPE Puzzle]]
--[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 22:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)


== When Microsoft started using UUIDs ==
== When Microsoft started using UUIDs ==

Revision as of 04:17, 21 July 2022

When Microsoft started using UUIDs

To help fill in the history for when Microsoft started using UUIDs (the "when" question is flagged in the article), I have a bit of information that might help someone search for the answer.

I attended a Microsoft conference at the Redmond campus in 1995 where a presenter gave information about UUIDs, how they are essentially unique, and that Microsoft was going to be using them.

That's not enough to put into the article, obviously, but maybe it'll help give a timeline if someone is researching this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris uvic (talkcontribs) 18:20, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Other vairants of UUID

Reviewing logs in a web gateway, UUID Variant "e" was observed in the wild. This is not Random as fields 3 4 5 are the same between two seperate UUIDs

406bb3ab-a127-ec11-981f-c896653b5010 213d5787-2629-ec11-981f-c896653b5010

https://email.ngpvan.com/unsubscribeUnique/406bb3ab-a127-ec11-981f-c896653b5010/213d5787-2629-ec11-981f-c896653b5010?nvep=ewogICJUZW5hbnRVcmkiOiAibmdwdmFuOi8vdmFuL05HUC9OR1A0Mi8xLzg4NTAzIiwKICAiRGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uVW5pcXVlSWQiOiAiMjEzZDU3ODctMjYyOS1lYzExLTk4MWYtYzg5NjY1M2I5MjA4IiwKICAiRW1haWxBZGRyZXNzIjogImxvbGVyY29hc3RlckBjaXNjby5jb20iCn0%3D &hmac=wVRUIC0pn7S85lof8rzhxr1gJh2MXaBVOMZRmH_96HI=&id=1326529531

  • Log has been altered to remove PII while not changing data type/or meaning

173.38.117.90 (talk)DBNerd — Preceding undated comment added 13:13, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Versions

There is a draft RFC which introduces versions 6, 7 and 8, as well as a form called MAX UUID.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-peabody-dispatch-new-uuid-format#section-3

I don't know if this proposal merits inclusion, or if we should wait until it is finalized.

Bend1010 (talk) 20:31, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]