User talk:Hipocrite

Hello, Hipocrite. Your no-talkback edit notice is constantly ignored. Facepalm

This user has opted out of talkbacks

I do check my Wikipedia-related email, to those who ask. I don't typically do what emailers want.

You will remove talkback notices every time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. They will never stop.

Frustration regarding Littlefeather

Hi, I am clearly missing a lot of context for this entire situation; I was involved right at the very beginning but have been busy since, but it seems clear that there are a lot of strong opinions on this developing situation. As such, I just wanted to reach out and gently remind you to always strive for Wikipedian ideals such as civility, collaboration, reliability, and neutrality, to name a few. Weaponizing the POV template is not an appropriate response to opposition; this is a developing story that clearly has lots of back-and-forth moving parts. Again, I am missing a lot of context at this point, but I wanted to reach out based on the most recent series of edits on both the article and talk page. Sometimes the best thing to do sometimes is to walk away and edit elsewhere, and to come back with a clear head. I've had to do that plenty of times. TNstingray (talk) 22:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

I suggest that there is a serious NPOV problem on the page. I have discussed on the talk page, and have exactly zero reverts on the main page. I suggest you've picked the wrong person to discuss this with - I'm not the one disparaging a recently dead person. Hipocrite (talk) 00:05, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

See also [1], where another editor believes the article is violating NPOV. Hipocrite (talk) 00:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Having read through the conversations, perhaps I initially mischaracterized your position. That being said, the fact remains that weaponizing templates is an inappropriate bypass of talk page conversations. The information in the article is framed accordingly: Littlefeather said this, and Keeler said that (the latter only has three small sections counting the lede). That in and of itself is not in violation of NPOV, so the issue comes down to the inclusion of your sources. And that is where discussion comes in, and my points still stand to maintain an air of civility even if that is not extended back towards you. I'm behind on reading those sources, so I can see where I stand on the matter. TNstingray (talk) 00:34, 25 October 2022 (UTC)