User talk:Heroeswithmetaphors

• ANTIRACISM RESOURCES
• List of language self-study programs
• Great Books of the Western World
• BBC list of 100 'most inspiring' novels
• List of highest-income urban neighborhoods in the United States
• Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction
• Gates books
• List of Burgundy Grand Crus
• List of cities proper by population
• List of countries by GDP (nominal)
• The World's Billionaires
• List of cities by number of billionaires
• Financial Times and McKinsey Business Book of the Year Award
• The Economist Books of the Year
• 10 best books about Wall Street
• GSelevator book list
• List of judo techniques
• Zhuangzi Bilingual Chinese-English version (James Legge translation)

• “There are two types of people: those who try to win and those who try to win arguments.” -- flâneur Nassim Nicholas Taleb
• "Nothing is harder to put up with than the annoyance of good example." -- Mark Twain

[[File:Facebook like thumb.png|left|30px]] ~~~~

<ref name=""> {{cite web
| url=  
| title=  
| last=  
| first=  
| publisher=  
| date=  
| accessdate =
}} </ref>

<ref name=""> {{cite news  
| last=  
| first=  
| url=  
| title=  
| publisher=  
| date=  
| accessdate= 
}}  </ref>  
 

π

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from PricewaterhouseCoopers into ID2020. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 16:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

"Clergy sex abuse scandal" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Clergy sex abuse scandal. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 5#Clergy sex abuse scandal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 22:40, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

"Wikipedia in PRC" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia in PRC. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 11#Wikipedia in PRC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of William S. Pollack

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on William S. Pollack requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 16:32, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

TENET

Science

The film's plot revolves around reversing the entropy of things and people, resulting in time reversibility. Tenet makes reference to physics concepts including the second law of thermodynamics, Maxwell's demon, and Feynman and Wheeler's notion of a one-electron universe. Christopher Nolan stated in the film’s press notes: "we’re not going to make any case for this being scientifically accurate”. (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 18:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bell & Ross (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bell & Ross and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bell & Ross, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Heroeswithmetaphors! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Corruption in Albania

A tag has been placed on Category:Corruption in Albania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:59, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

DMX

Hey, Heroes. I wanted to let you know that I overwrote your edit on DMX in an edit conflict as I already had two sources where yours was, but I used the citation as a means of establishing around what time DMX suffered the overdose, thereby reincorporating the citation into the article. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 02:19, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Currencies introduced in 2020

A tag has been placed on Category:Currencies introduced in 2020 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:51, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

"Indian variant" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Indian variant. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 16#Indian variant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Bangalamania (talk) 17:01, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:35, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

"German officers" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect German officers. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 29#German officers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Talk 06:16, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

"Political instability" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Political instability. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 24#Political instability until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay ^(Talk) 13:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ankr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ankr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankr until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

^Hidden_{Lemon /}^{/ talk} 18:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Solana (blockchain platform)

The article Solana (blockchain platform) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not established notability yet,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 22:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Phoebe English for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phoebe English is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoebe English until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

FossLimi (talk) 13:31, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shūshoku katsudō

The article Shūshoku katsudō has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Duplicate of Simultaneous recruiting of new graduates, which covers the topic in more detail.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 747pilot (talk) 14:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Merger of Shūshoku katsudō into Simultaneous recruiting of new graduates

Hello @Heroeswithmetaphors:. I noticed you created Shūshoku katsudō, however I feel it may be redundant as it is the same thing as Simultaneous recruiting of new graduates. Perhaps we can merge the content into Simultaneous recruiting of new graduates, then redirect Shūshoku katsudō, or just delete Shūshoku katsudō. 747pilot (talk) 13:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Yes, I think the content can be folded into the larger article that is already specific to Japan. Thank you. (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 16:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome, I've now completed the merger and redirected Shūshoku katsudō. Have a good weekend! 747pilot (talk) 20:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello Hero

I was wondering could we have a conversation about you updating my Wikipedia. I love your writing style. 72.241.22.81 (talk) 03:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

It appears that you copied or moved text from Jackson Park (Chicago) to Garden of the Phoenix. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 02:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Ryan Grantham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Grantham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Grantham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Goszei (talk) 06:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Hello, I'm Btspurplegalaxy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Audrey Nuna have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 05:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vladimir Makei, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. WikiHannibal (talk) 08:47, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"Googlenet" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Googlenet and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 22 § Googlenet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Muhali (talk) 12:15, 22 December 2022 (UTC)