Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 December 31: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
Line 18: Line 18:
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''


The result of the discussion was '''merge'''<!-- Tfd top --> to [[Template:Motorsports class]] or another name that's clear but not too long. [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 17:39, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was '''merge'''<!-- Tfd top --> to [[Template:Motorsport class]] or another name that's clear but not too long. [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 17:39, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
* {{tfd links|Class A}}
* {{tfd links|Class A}}
* {{tfd links|Class B}}
* {{tfd links|Class B}}

Latest revision as of 17:44, 7 January 2023

colored letter span

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Motorsport class or another name that's clear but not too long. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:39, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I propose merging the templates {{Class A}} / {{Class B}} / {{Class C}} / {{Class D}} / {{Class G}} together, as they are mostly identical, except for the letter displayed and background color. They could also gain a more identifiable name since "Class A", "Class B", "Class C", "Class D", "Class G" mean a whole lot of things. I suggest {{Motorsports class tag}} that takes a single parameter, the class name, and outputs the current various square color letters. This will also allow expansion for other classes than these 5, and merging in of other such templates. The class name would be a selector to choose the display text and colors that are defined in the template. -- 64.229.90.28 (talk) 03:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

64.229.90.28, and {{Class G}}? — Qwerfjkltalk 03:45, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, oops, sorry, I missed that one. That one as well -- 64.229.90.28 (talk) 03:54, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
UPDATED to include {{Class G}} that I missed when I first wrote this up. -- 64.229.90.28 (talk) 03:56, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Including also Template:Junior. Gonnym (talk) 12:31, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I created these templates and agree that they should be merged into one. Is it possible to have a name shorter than Motorsports class tag? Corvus tristis (talk) 05:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Corvus tristis, {{mct}}? — Qwerfjkltalk 20:35, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We try to avoid shortenings so short. I think {{motorsports class}} is probably fine. Izno (talk) 20:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can we just end this it is disrupting all feeder series articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RxxingAddict (talkcontribs) 12:29, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).