Talk:Jacinda Ardern: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:48, 2 February 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jacinda Ardern article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

Jacinda Ardern was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 1, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed
May 4, 2021	Good article reassessment	Delisted

News items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on October 20, 2017, October 17, 2020, and January 20, 2023.

Current status: Delisted good article

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Politics and Government B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Top-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women B‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New Zealand: Politics B‑class Top‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuseeland and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Socialism B‑class Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Politics B‑class High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Hoch	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Feminism B‑class Mid‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in New Zealand English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse, centre, fiord) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Template:Vital article

Text and/or other creative content from Jacindamania was copied or moved into Jacinda Ardern with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Reactions to the death of Elizabeth II was copied or moved into Jacinda Ardern. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

“Monarchs”

Is there a reason the info-box lists “Monarchs” but not “Deputies” or “Governors-General”? Surely it should be consistently in the singular. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jekrox (talk • contribs) 06:33, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it should be consistent, I have had a look on other PM’s wikis and there is a mixture of approaches (some pluralised for multiples, others not), but from a review of the others I think it looks best, requires the least upkeep, and still reads ok to keep it in the singular. Feel free to disagree and/or revert if you can come up with better reasons than mine Cbe46 (talk) 18:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with both editors and their reasons above, and I would add that using plural can give the wrong impression that there were two monarchs on the throne simultaneously during Jacinda Ardern's term of office as PM of NZ. Bcmh (talk) 05:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lede is way too long

This seems to be a trend on Wikipedia lately. Ledes ramble on and on with editorialising. It's a bad look for Wikipedia, honestly, never ending leads make me run away from the page. Tallard (talk) 05:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It could perhaps be trimmed a little, but major world leaders have always had quite long ledes and this does not seem out of line. --Pokelova (talk) 05:48, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 05:40, 2 February 2023 edit Tallard (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,358 edits →‎Lede is way too long: new section Tag: New topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:48, 2 February 2023 edit undo Pokelova (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 9,800 edits →‎Lede is way too long Next edit →
Line 53:		Line 53:

	This seems to be a trend on Wikipedia lately. Ledes ramble on and on with editorialising. It's a bad look for Wikipedia, honestly, never ending leads make me run away from the page. [[User:Tallard\|Tallard]] ([[User talk:Tallard\|talk]]) 05:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC)		This seems to be a trend on Wikipedia lately. Ledes ramble on and on with editorialising. It's a bad look for Wikipedia, honestly, never ending leads make me run away from the page. [[User:Tallard\|Tallard]] ([[User talk:Tallard\|talk]]) 05:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
			:It could perhaps be trimmed a little, but major world leaders have always had quite long ledes and this does not seem out of line. --[[User:Pokelova\|Pokelova]] ([[User talk:Pokelova\|talk]]) 05:48, 2 February 2023 (UTC)