Jump to content

Talk:Westinghouse Atom Smasher: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ijggrz (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Ijggrz (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:


==Adding more information to the wartime effort section==
==Adding more information to the wartime effort section==
Adding some more information that I have found about the wartime efforts during World War 2. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ijggrz|Ijggrz]] ([[User talk:Ijggrz#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ijggrz|contribs]]) 22:25, 7 April 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Adding some more information that I have found about the wartime efforts during World War 2.--[[User:Ijggrz|Ijggrz]] ([[User talk:Ijggrz|talk]]) 22:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)


==Wiki Education assignment: History of Science==
==Wiki Education assignment: History of Science==

Revision as of 22:30, 7 April 2023

Better name?

I'm pretty sure the official name for this facility was not "Westinghouse Atom Smasher". I suggest this page be moved to a more appropriate name. If we can't find the official name, something like Westinghouse 1937 Van de Graaff accelerator might be more specific and informative. --ChetvornoTALK 22:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • According to the Wikipedia:Article titles#Common names, "Wikipedia prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in reliable English-language sources) as such names will be the most recognizable and the most natural". Take a look at all the sources, Westinghouse Atom Smasher is the most prevalent and recognizable name for this object, so it should remain where it is. --GrapedApe (talk) 10:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I have to agree with you. Normally if an accelerator is notable it is commonly referred to by its name; nobody calls the Large Hadron Collider the "Geneva Atom Smasher". But I can't find much reference to the Westinghouse machine in technical literature. Its useful life was short; it was apparently obsolete soon after it was completed. And there is some speculation that it was just built for PR purposes, as a prestige item to attract scientific talent to Westinghouse. I guess its most notable role was as a Pittsburgh-area landmark, and the Landmark Commission calls it the "Westinhouse Atom Smasher", so Westinghouse Atom Smasher it is. --ChetvornoTALK 15:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting--are you aware of any references that may have been built mostly for PR purposes? That would be worth adding.--GrapedApe (talk) 12:42, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just this Pittsburgh Post-Gazette op-ed piece. Looks like the only hard evidence were some quotes from the WH board that the machine's high cost was justified "to obtain good publicity value". --ChetvornoTALK 09:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Additional information to lead

I am going to be adding additional information to the lead section about what the atom smasher did or what it was used for. El.Guapo6564 (talk) 17:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a wartime effort section

What the atom smasher and its workers did during the second world war and what happened after. Ijggrz (talk) 17:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding more information to the wartime effort section

Adding some more information that I have found about the wartime efforts during World War 2.--Ijggrz (talk) 22:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: History of Science

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2023 and 5 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): El.Guapo6564, Ijggrz (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Patkeo6, Audrey Metcalf.

— Assignment last updated by K8shep (talk) 18:03, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]