Jump to content

Talk:Baccarat (company): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Keisigei (talk | contribs)
Line 16: Line 16:


:I have now removed content that was problematic for various reasons including [[WP:plagiarism|plagiarism]] ([[Special:Diff/1126140825]]), citing [[WP:USERG|user-generated content]] ([[Special:Diff/1126141056]]), [[WP:OR|original research]] based on primary sources ([[Special:Diff/1126141476]]), combining sources into something neither said ([[Special:Diff/1126141544]]), and an apparent lack of relevance ([[Special:Diff/1126141902]]). [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 19:39, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
:I have now removed content that was problematic for various reasons including [[WP:plagiarism|plagiarism]] ([[Special:Diff/1126140825]]), citing [[WP:USERG|user-generated content]] ([[Special:Diff/1126141056]]), [[WP:OR|original research]] based on primary sources ([[Special:Diff/1126141476]]), combining sources into something neither said ([[Special:Diff/1126141544]]), and an apparent lack of relevance ([[Special:Diff/1126141902]]). [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 19:39, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

== Factual errors and questionable neutrality ==

Specifically, a recent restore of previously removed and discredited edits by Chrma626 have now been picked up by MartinPict and these new edits have ineligible sources (auction results), sources that do not confirm the assertions made, incorrect information (Pierre Laval, for example, was not ever a Nazi) and reflects a bias toward and imbalance of balanced tone on page with an overemphasis on World War II -related allegations without adequate sources. [[User:Keisigei|Keisigei]] ([[User talk:Keisigei|talk]]) 12:47, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:47, 13 June 2023

Updating article

I have noticed several updates to the article which have been reverted. If you have a potential conflict of interest in updating the article, please make your suggestions on this talk page. There are many policies and guidelines which I may be able to help you with. The article does need updating and although you may have a conflict of interest, your ideas, suggestions and comments will help improve the article. Feel free to discuss here or on my talk page. Cheers Gmcbjames (talk) 18:03, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality concerns

Original heading: "non-neutral biased edits" ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:24, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted the last edits by @Chrma626 as they violate WP:Copyright WP:MOS etc. 45mml.23 (talk) 13:38, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have now removed content that was problematic for various reasons including plagiarism (Special:Diff/1126140825), citing user-generated content (Special:Diff/1126141056), original research based on primary sources (Special:Diff/1126141476), combining sources into something neither said (Special:Diff/1126141544), and an apparent lack of relevance (Special:Diff/1126141902). ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:39, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Factual errors and questionable neutrality

Specifically, a recent restore of previously removed and discredited edits by Chrma626 have now been picked up by MartinPict and these new edits have ineligible sources (auction results), sources that do not confirm the assertions made, incorrect information (Pierre Laval, for example, was not ever a Nazi) and reflects a bias toward and imbalance of balanced tone on page with an overemphasis on World War II -related allegations without adequate sources. Keisigei (talk) 12:47, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]