User talk:Inomyabcs: Difference between revisions

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 09:49, 30 June 2023

re: revert

I don't know how to tag people with notification correctly. I couldnt find much on deodorant spray, so fair enough! Cripplemac (talk) 02:29, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October blitz bling

		The (old school) League of Copy Editors Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Inomyabcs for copy edits totaling over 15,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE October 2022 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 20:21, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Department of South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pichemist was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Department of South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 17:50, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inomyabcs! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! _Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 17:50, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request to comment

I request you to comment on this discussion. Thanks. Cinephilekrr (talk) 12:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Me & Mickey

How about now? 192.248.210.20 (talk) 13:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Honestly, I think we should just create a sarcasm template just for EEng"

As it happens, there's Template:FBDB. E Eng 09:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@EEng, oh we did create one already for you. Task item deleted. Inomyabcs (talk) 09:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 09:31, 30 June 2023 edit EEng (talk \| contribs) Edit filter helpers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors 96,062 edits →‎"Honestly, I think we should just create a sarcasm template just for EEng": new section Tag: New topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:49, 30 June 2023 edit undo Inomyabcs (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 1,926 edits →‎"Honestly, I think we should just create a sarcasm template just for EEng": Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 78:		Line 78:

	As it happens, there's [[Template:FBDB]]. [[User:EEng#s\|<b style="color:red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s\|<b style="color:blue;">Eng</b>]] 09:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)		As it happens, there's [[Template:FBDB]]. [[User:EEng#s\|<b style="color:red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s\|<b style="color:blue;">Eng</b>]] 09:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

			:@[[User:EEng\|EEng]], oh we did create one already for you. Task item deleted. [[User:Inomyabcs\|Inomyabcs]] ([[User talk:Inomyabcs#top\|talk]]) 09:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)