User talk:Lettherebedarklight

CLEAN START

lettherebedarklight no longer uses this account.

Show another

Concern regarding Draft:Manfred Deix

Hello, Lettherebedarklight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Manfred Deix, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Denver Fenton Allen v. State of Georgia

Hello, Lettherebedarklight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Denver Fenton Allen v. State of Georgia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Teahouse#Welcoming me on Wikipedia

• Permalink

Was it really necessary to call that user a bit self-centered? That seems pretty WP:BITEy to me. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:21, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Birth date of Adam Leitman Bailey

Hi Lettherebedarklight, where is this information from? I can't find it in the cited source. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

@tobefree: i just took it from the infobox. didn't bother to check the source. whoops. lettherebedarklight晚安 05:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Ah, no worries. I was afraid I had overlooked something in the source. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of James Farrell (police officer)

Hello! Your submission of James Farrell (police officer) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Khaled al-Qazzaz, you may be blocked from editing. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 16:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

User page

Hi lettherebedarklight. I came across your use page today and noted the altered "semi-retired" notice. Since the word you used is considered a slur by many, any chance you could change it to something else? Thanks. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 18:35, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

it is? darn, i saw it, thought it was funny, and stole it. removed now. lettherebedarklight晚安 18:37, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Teahouse

At the Teahouse, you inexplicably wrote we don't have content policies. Where did you get that notion? We have three interrelated and mandatory core content policies, which are Verifiability, the Neutral point of view and OR|No original research. We have essential content policies about Biographies of living people and Copyright compliance and other things as well. Please do not answer policy questions when it is clear that you are not conversant with the actual policies. Cullen328 (talk) 08:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

i meant content policies in the sense that the asker meant it. lettherebedarklight晚安 10:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

yeah

I think you're right, not sure whether it's quite enough similarity yet, but I'll keep an eye on it, and thanks! Valereee (talk) 12:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Your welcome! I’m glad I feel safe out there. ~WikiCoverings11111 (message) 14:24, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Citation Archive

Thanks for your good faith non-admin close. I don't think anybody's going to object to this closure, but I'll take a liberty and give critique: normally, we shouldn't close a deletion procedure early in a case where the nominator has withdrawn their nom, but at least one other participant has asserted delete. I would have left the process to run its full seven days. In this instance, I think your keep closure was a correct reading of the discussion and I believe the outcome would have been the same if you'd allowed the process to continue. I encourage you to continue closing in obvious cases to get a feel for the process (and make a few mistakes, frankly). Please accept this call-out as such encouragement, not any sort of warning. If you ever need help, feel free to call on me. Thanks for your efforts. BusterD (talk) 13:21, 15 July 2023 (UTC)