Jump to content

Talk:March equinox: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Reverted New topic
Line 13: Line 13:
|box-advert=yes
|box-advert=yes
}}
}}

== ???The northward equinox passed into Pisces in the year −67 (68 BC)??? ==

According to the annotations made by Hipparchus in the year 129 BC, based on his observations of the Spica, the northward equinox had passed 2 degrees in a period of 144 years -- still being in the Aries constellation at that moment. How could it have been passed into Pisces in the year 68 BC, that is, less than 70 years later?
Isn't the velocity of the travel limited to only one degree every 72 years? If so, it has to have taken a much longer time to pass into Pisces. [[Special:Contributions/189.40.65.121|189.40.65.121]] ([[User talk:189.40.65.121|talk]]) 00:16, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:16, 30 July 2023

Template:Vital article

WikiProject iconAstronomy C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HochThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconHolidays C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HochThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.


???The northward equinox passed into Pisces in the year −67 (68 BC)???

According to the annotations made by Hipparchus in the year 129 BC, based on his observations of the Spica, the northward equinox had passed 2 degrees in a period of 144 years -- still being in the Aries constellation at that moment. How could it have been passed into Pisces in the year 68 BC, that is, less than 70 years later? Isn't the velocity of the travel limited to only one degree every 72 years? If so, it has to have taken a much longer time to pass into Pisces. 189.40.65.121 (talk) 00:16, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]