Jump to content

Biological effects of high-energy visible light: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Unjustified deletion of content
Restored revision 1173909925 by AnomieBOT (talk): Make a case on Talk then
Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
Line 21: Line 21:
==Negative effects==
==Negative effects==
===Blue light hazard===
===Blue light hazard===

The mechanism underlying blue-light hazard concerns a breakdown in the photochemical synergy between the [[retinal pigment epithelium]] (RPE) and the [[Photoreceptor cell|photoreceptor cells]]. Acute exposure takes the form of a depigmented lesion visible in the RPE, which may cause a temporary or permanent [[scotoma]] depending upon the intensity and duration of exposure. However, the specific mechanism is still largely unknown.<ref name="Bull20192">{{cite journal |last1=Bullough |first1=John D. |last2=Bierman |first2=Andrew |last3=Rea |first3=Mark S. |date=3 April 2019 |title=Evaluating the blue-light hazard from solid state lighting |journal=International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics |volume=25 |issue=2 |pages=311–320 |doi=10.1080/10803548.2017.1375172 |pmid=28876164 |s2cid=10490626}}</ref>

Absorption of blue light, has been shown in rats and in a susceptible strain of mice to cause a problem in the process so that cells become unbleached and responsive again to light before they are ready. At wavelengths of blue light below 430&nbsp;nm this greatly increases the potential for oxidative damage.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Grimm C, Wenzel A, Williams T, Rol P, Hafezi F, Remy C |date=February 2001 |title=Rhodopsin-mediated blue-light damage to the rat retina: effect of photoreversal of bleaching |url=http://www.iovs.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=11157889 |url-status=dead |journal=Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. |volume=42 |issue=2 |pages=497–505 |pmid=11157889 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120525164413/http://www.iovs.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=11157889 |archive-date=2012-05-25}}</ref> For blue-light circadian therapy, harm is minimized by employing blue light at the near-green end of the blue spectrum. "1-2 min of 408 nm and 25 minutes of 430 nm are sufficient to cause irreversible death of photoreceptors and lesions of the retinal pigment epithelium. [...] The action spectrum of light-sensitive retinal ganglion cells was found to peak at approximately 450 nm, a range with lower damage potential, yet not completely outside the damaging range."<ref>{{cite journal |author=Remy C |title=Blue Light and the Retina: Good and Bad? |journal=Soc Light Treatment Biol Rhythms |volume=Abstracts 2005, 17:46}}</ref>


A 2019 report by France's [[Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail|Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES)]] highlights short-term effects on the retina linked to intense exposure to blue LED light, and long-term effects linked to the onset of age-related macular degeneration.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.anses.fr/en/content/leds-blue-light |title=LEDs & blue light {{!}} Anses - Agence nationale de sécurité Sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail |website=anses.fr |date=13 August 2019 |access-date=2020-01-29}}</ref> Although few studies have examined occupational causes of macular degeneration, they show that long-term sunlight exposure, specifically its blue-light component, is associated with macular degeneration in outdoor workers.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Modenese |first1=Alberto |last2=Gobba |first2=Fabriziomaria |title=Macular degeneration and occupational risk factors: a systematic review |journal=International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health |date=September 6, 2018 |volume=92 |issue=1 |pages=1–11 |doi=10.1007/s00420-018-1355-y |pmid=30191305 |pmc=6323067 }}</ref> However, the [[International Commission on Illumination|CIE]] published its position on the low risk of blue-light hazard resulting from the use of LED technology in general lighting bulbs in April 2019.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.cie.co.at/publications/position-statement-blue-light-hazard-april-23-2019|title=Position Statement on the Blue Light Hazard (April 23, 2019) {{!}} CIE|website=www.cie.co.at|language=en|access-date=2019-07-24}}</ref>
A 2019 report by France's [[Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail|Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES)]] highlights short-term effects on the retina linked to intense exposure to blue LED light, and long-term effects linked to the onset of age-related macular degeneration.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.anses.fr/en/content/leds-blue-light |title=LEDs & blue light {{!}} Anses - Agence nationale de sécurité Sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail |website=anses.fr |date=13 August 2019 |access-date=2020-01-29}}</ref> Although few studies have examined occupational causes of macular degeneration, they show that long-term sunlight exposure, specifically its blue-light component, is associated with macular degeneration in outdoor workers.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Modenese |first1=Alberto |last2=Gobba |first2=Fabriziomaria |title=Macular degeneration and occupational risk factors: a systematic review |journal=International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health |date=September 6, 2018 |volume=92 |issue=1 |pages=1–11 |doi=10.1007/s00420-018-1355-y |pmid=30191305 |pmc=6323067 }}</ref> However, the [[International Commission on Illumination|CIE]] published its position on the low risk of blue-light hazard resulting from the use of LED technology in general lighting bulbs in April 2019.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.cie.co.at/publications/position-statement-blue-light-hazard-april-23-2019|title=Position Statement on the Blue Light Hazard (April 23, 2019) {{!}} CIE|website=www.cie.co.at|language=en|access-date=2019-07-24}}</ref>
Line 57: Line 53:


Aggressive advertisements may contribute to the incorrect public perception of the purported dangers of blue light. Even when research has shown no evidence to support the use of blue-blocking filters as a clinical treatment for digital eye strain, ophthalmic lens manufacturers continue to market them as lenses that reduce digital eye strain.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=M |first1=Rosenfield |last2=RT |first2=Li |last3=NT |first3=Kirsch |title=A double-blind test of blue-blocking filters on symptoms of digital eye strain |journal=Work (Reading, Mass.) |date=2020 |volume=65 |issue=2 |pages=343–348 |doi=10.3233/WOR-203086 |pmid=32007978 |s2cid=211012744 |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32007978/}}</ref>
Aggressive advertisements may contribute to the incorrect public perception of the purported dangers of blue light. Even when research has shown no evidence to support the use of blue-blocking filters as a clinical treatment for digital eye strain, ophthalmic lens manufacturers continue to market them as lenses that reduce digital eye strain.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=M |first1=Rosenfield |last2=RT |first2=Li |last3=NT |first3=Kirsch |title=A double-blind test of blue-blocking filters on symptoms of digital eye strain |journal=Work (Reading, Mass.) |date=2020 |volume=65 |issue=2 |pages=343–348 |doi=10.3233/WOR-203086 |pmid=32007978 |s2cid=211012744 |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32007978/}}</ref>

[[Essilor]] claims that one may experience vision loss without their special filtering lenses, whether one requires prescription glasses or not.<ref>{{cite web |title=Lenses To Protect Your Eyes From Harmful Blue Light |url=https://www.essilor.com.au/products/blue-light-protection-lenses |access-date=December 9, 2018 |publisher=Essilor}}</ref>. A sponsored post on NewGradOptometry promoted sales training from Essilor and their product range (including the moral benefits), then segued into the amoral nature of upselling unnecessary lenses, finishing by arguing that patients will go blind without blue-filtering lenses.<ref>{{cite web |last=Geller |first=Matt |date=September 8, 2014 |title=Everything to Know About Blue Light and Crizal Prevencia |url=https://newgradoptometry.com/everything-to-know-about-blue-light-crizal-prevencia/ |publisher=NewGradOptometry}}</ref> Essilor provided a pair of free glasses to a fashion blogger who did not need prescription glasses but nonetheless quoted a large number of Essilor marketing pitches including the blindness-preventing promises of their blue-light filtering technology. [[Zeiss]] offers a similar product yet does not make nearly as extreme claims.<ref>{{cite web |date=October 16, 2017 |title=Blue Light: the good and the bad |url=https://www.zeiss.com.au/vision-care/better-vision/understanding-vision/blue-light-the-good-and-the-bad.html}}</ref>


The UK's [[General Optical Council]] has criticised [[Boots Opticians]] for their unsubstantiated claims regarding their line of blue-light filtering lenses; and the [[Advertising Standards Authority (United Kingdom)|Advertising Standards Authority]] fined them £40,000. Boots Opticians sold the lenses for a £20 markup.<ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.insightnews.com.au/Article3/810/Optical-chain-fined-69-000-for-misleading-ad|title= Optical chain fined $69,000 for misleading ad|first= Matthew |last= Woodley|publisher= Insight|date= May 31, 2017}}</ref> Trevor Warburton, speaking on behalf of the UK [[Association of Optometrists]] stated: "...current evidence does not support making claims that they prevent eye disease."<ref name="aopboots">{{cite web|url= https://www.aop.org.uk/ot/industry/high-street/2017/05/26/boots-opticians-fined-40000-over-misleading-blue-light-advertising|title =BOOTS OPTICIANS FINED £40,000 OVER MISLEADING BLUE LIGHT ADVERTISING|date= May 26, 2017|publisher= Optometry Today |first= Selina|last= Powell}}</ref>.
The UK's [[General Optical Council]] has criticised [[Boots Opticians]] for their unsubstantiated claims regarding their line of blue-light filtering lenses; and the [[Advertising Standards Authority (United Kingdom)|Advertising Standards Authority]] fined them £40,000. Boots Opticians sold the lenses for a £20 markup.<ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.insightnews.com.au/Article3/810/Optical-chain-fined-69-000-for-misleading-ad|title= Optical chain fined $69,000 for misleading ad|first= Matthew |last= Woodley|publisher= Insight|date= May 31, 2017}}</ref> Trevor Warburton, speaking on behalf of the UK [[Association of Optometrists]] stated: "...current evidence does not support making claims that they prevent eye disease."<ref name="aopboots">{{cite web|url= https://www.aop.org.uk/ot/industry/high-street/2017/05/26/boots-opticians-fined-40000-over-misleading-blue-light-advertising|title =BOOTS OPTICIANS FINED £40,000 OVER MISLEADING BLUE LIGHT ADVERTISING|date= May 26, 2017|publisher= Optometry Today |first= Selina|last= Powell}}</ref>.

Revision as of 17:32, 5 September 2023

Blue light, a type of high-energy light, is part of the visible light spectrum

High-energy visible light (HEV light) is short-wave light in the violet/blue band from 400 to 450 nm in the visible spectrum, which has a number of purported negative biological effects, namely on circadian rhythm and retinal health (blue-light hazard), which can lead to age-related macular degeneration.[1][2] Increasingly, blue blocking filters are being designed into glasses to avoid blue light's purported negative effects. However, there is no good evidence that filtering blue light with spectacles has any effect on eye health, eye strain, sleep quality or vision quality.[3]

Blue light

Blue light refers to light in the blue part of the visible spectrum, not necessarily light that is blue, hence why the term high-energy visible (HEV) light is sometimes preferred. When HEV light is alone in a spectrum, it will appear blue, but HEV light can also be a component of broadband colors (white, purple, green, etc.). Blue light is sometimes defined broadly as having a wavelength between 400 and 525 nm, or more narrowly between 400 and 450 nm. However, the bandwidth of the blue light isn't directly significant to the negative effects; rather the overlap of the light spectrum with either the blue-light hazard function or melanopsin spectral sensitivity function is a better measure of the possible negative effect of the light.

Sources of blue light

Spectra of common lighting sources (fluorescent, ultra white led, halogen bulb, white led, incandescent bulb) showing their relative amount of blue light

Blue light is an essential component of white light, including all forms of lighting. The color temperature of a light is a good indication of how much blue light is included, where cool light will have proportionally more blue. However, an intense warm light (e.g. direct sunlight) will still contain more blue light than a dim cool light (e.g. overcast light). LED displays, sunlight, architectural lighting, street lights, vehicle headlamps, and camera flashes all contain blue light. The distribution of light can be quantified with emission spectroscopy to create spectra, which can be analyzed to determine the extent of blue light. Another characteristic of light sources is the color rendering index (CRI), which establishes how smooth (high CRI) or peaky (low CRI) the spectrum is.

Blue LED light

Blue LEDs are often the target of blue-light research due to the increasing prevalence of LED displays and Solid-state lighting (e.g. LED illumination), as well as the blue appearance (higher color temperature) compared with traditional sources. However, natural sunlight has a relatively high spectral density of blue light, so exposure to high levels of blue light is not a new or unique phenomenon despite the relatively recent emergence of LED display technologies. While LED displays emit white by exciting all RGB LEDs, white light from lighting is generally produced by pairing a blue LED emitting primarily near 450 nm combined with a phosphor for down-conversion of some of the blue light to longer wavelengths, which then combine to form white light. This is often considered “the next generation of illumination” as SSL technology dramatically reduces energy resource requirements.[4]

Luminous efficiency

Concerns regarding blue LEDs are related to the difference between photometry and radiometry. Photometry is concerned with the study of human perception of visible light, while radiometry is concerned with the measurement of light energy. Human perception of brightness of different frequencies of light is defined according to the CIE luminous efficiency function V(λ). The peak efficiency of light perception occurs at 555 nm (V(λ)=1). Efficiency decreases towards the extremes of the visible spectrum, where more light energy is required to evoke the same perceptual brightness.

Blue LEDs, particularly those used in white LEDs, operate at around 450 nm, where V(λ)=0.038.[5][6] This means that blue light at 450 nm requires about 25 times the radiant flux (energy) for one to perceive the same luminous flux as green light at 555 nm. For comparison, UV-A at 380  nm (V(λ)=0.000 039) requires 25 641 times the amount of radiometric energy to be perceived at the same intensity as green, three orders of magnitude greater than blue LEDs.[7][8] Studies often compare animal trials using identical luminous flux rather than radiance meaning comparative levels of perceived light at different frequencies rather than total emitted energy.[9][10]

Negative effects

Blue light hazard

A 2019 report by France's Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES) highlights short-term effects on the retina linked to intense exposure to blue LED light, and long-term effects linked to the onset of age-related macular degeneration.[11] Although few studies have examined occupational causes of macular degeneration, they show that long-term sunlight exposure, specifically its blue-light component, is associated with macular degeneration in outdoor workers.[12] However, the CIE published its position on the low risk of blue-light hazard resulting from the use of LED technology in general lighting bulbs in April 2019.[13]

The international standard IEC 62471 assesses the photobiological safety of light sources.[14] A proposed standard, IEC 62778, provides additional guidance in the assessment of blue-light hazard of all lighting products.[15]

Circadian disruption

The circadian rhythm is a mechanism that regulates sleep patterns. One of the primary factors affecting the circadian ryhthm is the excitation of melanopsin, a light sensitive protein that absorbs maximally at 480 nm, but has at least 10% efficiency in the range of 450-540 nm.[16] The periodic (daily) exposure to sunlight generally tunes the circadian rhythm to a 24-hour cycle. However, exposure to light sources that excite melanopsin in the retina during nighttime can interfere with the circadian rhythm. Harvard Health Publishing asserts that exposure to blue light at night has a strong negative effect on sleep.[17] The aforementioned ANSES report "highlights [the] disruptive effects to biological rhythms and sleep, linked to exposure to even very low levels of blue light in the evening or at night, particularly via screens".[18] A 2016 press release by the American Medical Association concludes that there are negative effects on the circadian rhythm from the unrestrained use of LED street lighting and white LED lamps have 5 times greater impact on circadian sleep rhythms than conventional street lamps.[19] However, they also indicate that street lamp brightness is more strongly correlated to sleep outcomes.

Discomfort glare

The use of LEDs in street lights and vehicle head lamps, specifically with higher color temperature (more blue light), has been correlated with higher discomfort glare.[20]

Eye strain

Blue light has been implicated as the cause of digital eye strain, but there is no robust evidence to support this hypothesis.[21][22]

Blue light blocking

Concerns over exposure to blue light has predicated several solutions to decreasing blue light exposure, including disabling or attenuating blue LEDs in displays, color shifting displays towards yellow, or wearing glasses that filter out blue light.

Digital filters

Apple's and Microsoft's operating systems and even the preset settings of standalone computer monitors include options to reduce blue-light emissions by adjusting color temperature to a warmer gamut.[23][24] However, these settings dramatically reduce the size of the color gamut of the display, as they essentially simulate tritan color blindness, thereby sacrificing the usability of the displays. The filters can be set on a schedule to activate only when the sun is down.

Intraocular lenses

During cataract surgery, the opaque natural crystalline lens is replaced with a synthetic intraocular lens (IOL). The IOL may be designed to filter out equal, more or less UV light than the natural lens (have a higher or lower cutoff), and therefore attenuate or accentuate the blue-light hazard function. The effects of long term exposure of UV, violet and blue light on the retina can then be studied.[25] However, it has been argued that IOLs that remove more blue light than natural lenses negatively affect color vision and the circadian rhythm while not offering significant photoprotection.[26] Systematic reviews found no evidence of any effect in IOLs filtering blue light,[27] and none provided any reliable statistical evidence to suggest any effect regarding contrast sensitivity, macular degeneration, vision, color-discrimination or sleep disturbances.[28] One study claimed a large difference in observed fluorescein angiography examinations and observed markedly less "progression of abnormal fundus autofluorescence"; [29] however the authors failed to discuss the fact that the excitation beam is filtered light between 465 and 490 nm,[30] is largely blocked by blue light filtering IOLs[31] but not clear IOLs present in the control patients.

Blue light blocking lenses

Lenses that filter blue light have been on the market for a long time in the form of brown-, orange-, and yellow-tinted sunglasses.[32] These tinted lenses were popular for the belief that they enhanced contrast and depth perception, but after early research showing the health risks of blue light exposure,[33][34] became more popular for the purported health benefits of blocking blue light.[35]

The efficacy of blue-blocking lenses in blocking blue light is not disputed, but whether typical exposure to blue light is hazardous enough to require blue blocking lenses is highly disputed.[36] One problem with the glasses is that they cannot achieve positive outcomes in blue-light hazard and sleep simultaneously. To be effective in against blue-light hazard, the glasses must be worn continuously, especially during the day when exposure is higher. However, to force blue-light exposure that mimics the normal daylight cycle, the glasses must only be worn at night, when the exposure is already quite low from a photoprotective perspective. Regardless, some evidence shows that lenses that block blue light may be particularly useful for people with insomnia, bipolar disorder, delayed sleep phase disorder, or ADHD, though less beneficial for healthy sleepers.[37]

Aggressive advertisements may contribute to the incorrect public perception of the purported dangers of blue light. Even when research has shown no evidence to support the use of blue-blocking filters as a clinical treatment for digital eye strain, ophthalmic lens manufacturers continue to market them as lenses that reduce digital eye strain.[38]

The UK's General Optical Council has criticised Boots Opticians for their unsubstantiated claims regarding their line of blue-light filtering lenses; and the Advertising Standards Authority fined them £40,000. Boots Opticians sold the lenses for a £20 markup.[39] Trevor Warburton, speaking on behalf of the UK Association of Optometrists stated: "...current evidence does not support making claims that they prevent eye disease."[40].

Apple's and Microsoft's operating systems and even the preset settings of standalone computer monitors include options to reduce blue-light emissions by adjusting color temperature to a warmer gamut.[41][42] These settings dramatically reduce the color gamut of the display, sacrificing the usability of devices without providing any of the alleged benefits of reducing eye strain or preventing circadian rhythm disruption.

In July 2022, a Gamer Advantage advert on Twitch channel BobDuckNWeave was banned by the Advertising Standards Authority for making claims that blue light glasses could improve sleep without substantiation.[43][44]

Positive effects

Blue light is essential for regulating the circadian rhythm, because it stimulates melanopsin receptors in the eye.[45] This suppresses daytime melatonin, enabling wakefulness. Working in blue-free light (aka yellow light) for long periods of time disrupts circadian patterns because there is no melatonin suppression during the day, and reduced melatonin rebound at night.

Dermatology

Blue light within the range 400-450 nm has been reported in a number of studies to be effective as local treatment of eczema and psoriasis, as it purportedly helps dampen the immune response.[46][47][48] Recent studies have also shown improvement of facial acne upon exposure to an LED emitting at 414 nm.[49][50] A combination of exposure to red and blue lights is used more and more in clinical dermatologic therapies.[51][52] Constructors such as Philips currently develop devices and techniques emitting in the blue visible spectrum to be used in dermatologic therapy.[53][54]

See also

References

  1. ^ Glaz r-Hockstein C, Dunaief JL (January 2006). "Could blue light-blocking lenses decrease the risk of age-related macular degeneration?". Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.). 26 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1097/00006982-200601000-00001. PMID 16395131.
  2. ^ Margrain TH, Boulton M, Marshall J, Sliney DH (September 2004). "Do blue light filters confer protection against age-related macular degeneration?". Prog Retin Eye Res. 23 (5): 523–31. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.05.001. PMID 15302349. S2CID 40276594.
  3. ^ Singh S, Keller PR, Busija L, McMillan P, Makrai E, Lawrenson JG, et al. (2023). "Blue-light filtering spectacle lenses for visual performance, sleep, and macular health in adults". Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 (8): CD013244. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013244.pub2. PMC 10436683. PMID 37593770.
  4. ^ US. Department of energy. (2013). Solid-State Lighting Technology Fact Sheet (Optical Safety of LEDs). Available at: https://www.lightingglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/bsk-pdf-manager/82_opticalsafety_fact-sheet.pdf
  5. ^ "Product family datasheet:Cree® XLamp® XM-L LEDs" (PDF). Cree. p. 4.
  6. ^ "Technical Data Sheet X42182(Z-power LEDs)" (PDF). pp. 12–13.
  7. ^ "Colorimetry -- Part 1: CIE standard colorimetric observers". International Organization for Standardization. Retrieved December 9, 2018.
  8. ^ "Kay & Laby;tables of physical & chemical constants;General physics;SubSection: 2.5.3 Photometry". National Physical Laboratory; UK. Retrieved December 9, 2018.
  9. ^ Krigel, Arthur (2016). "Light-induced retinal damage using different light sources, protocols and rat strains reveals LED phototoxicity" (PDF). Neuroscience. 339. Centre de Recherches des Cordeliers. Université Paris Descartes, France.(Sorbonne University Faculty of Medicine, Physiology Department): 296–307. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.10.015. PMID 27751961. S2CID 1619530. Retrieved December 9, 2018.
  10. ^ "Light-emitting-diode induced retinal damage and its wavelength dependency in vivo" (PDF). International Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 10, No. 2. Feb 18, 2017.
  11. ^ "LEDs & blue light | Anses - Agence nationale de sécurité Sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail". anses.fr. 13 August 2019. Retrieved 2020-01-29.
  12. ^ Modenese, Alberto; Gobba, Fabriziomaria (September 6, 2018). "Macular degeneration and occupational risk factors: a systematic review". International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 92 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1007/s00420-018-1355-y. PMC 6323067. PMID 30191305.
  13. ^ "Position Statement on the Blue Light Hazard (April 23, 2019) | CIE". www.cie.co.at. Retrieved 2019-07-24.
  14. ^ Tsankov, Plamen Ts. (2020). "Lighting Technologies". In Pavlovic, Tomislav (ed.). The Sun and Photovoltaic Technologies. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland. p. 261. ISBN 978-3-030-22402-8. Retrieved May 26, 2022.
  15. ^ "The IEC addresses characterization of the blue light hazard (MAGAZINE)". LEDs Magazine. 15 January 2014. Retrieved 28 August 2023.
  16. ^ Enezi, Jazi al; Revell, Victoria; Brown, Timothy; Wynne, Jonathan; Schlangen, Luc; Lucas, Robert (August 2011). "A "Melanopic" Spectral Efficiency Function Predicts the Sensitivity of Melanopsin Photoreceptors to Polychromatic Lights". Journal of Biological Rhythms. 26 (4): 314–323. doi:10.1177/0748730411409719. PMID 21775290. S2CID 22369861.
  17. ^ "Blue Light Has A Dark Side". Harvard Health Letter. August 13, 2018.
  18. ^ "LEDs & blue light | Anses - Agence Nationale de sécurité Sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail". www.anses.fr. 13 August 2019. Retrieved 2020-01-29.
  19. ^ "AMA adopts guidance to reduce harm from high intensity street lights". American Medical Association. Retrieved 2020-01-29.
  20. ^ Sivak, Michael; Schoettle, Brandon; Minoda, Takako; Flannagan, Michael J. (1 October 2005). "Short-Wavelength Content of LED Headlamps and Discomfort Glare". LEUKOS. 2 (2): 145–154. doi:10.1582/LEUKOS.2005.02.02.006. S2CID 108253413.
  21. ^ Rosenfield, Mark (2016). "Computer vision syndrome (aka digital eye strain)". Optometry in Practice. 17 (1).
  22. ^ LaMotte, Sandee (2023-08-17). "Blue-light glasses don't help with eye strain, major study says". CNN. Retrieved 2023-08-24.
  23. ^ "How to use Night Shift on your Mac". March 13, 2019.
  24. ^ "Set your display for night time in Windows 10". March 13, 2019.
  25. ^ Bullough, John D.; Bierman, Andrew; Rea, Mark S. (3 April 2019). "Evaluating the blue-light hazard from solid state lighting". International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 25 (2): 311–320. doi:10.1080/10803548.2017.1375172. PMID 28876164. S2CID 10490626.
  26. ^ Mainster, Martin A.; Turner, Patricia L. (May 2010). "Blue-blocking IOLs Decrease Photoreception Without Providing Significant Photoprotection". Survey of Ophthalmology. 55 (3): 272–283. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.07.006. PMID 19883931.
  27. ^ Vagge, Aldo; Ferro Desideri, Lorenzo; Del Noce, Chiara; Di Mola, Ilaria; Sindaco, Daniele; Traverso, Carlo E. (2021-03-18). "Blue light filtering ophthalmic lenses: A systematic review". Seminars in Ophthalmology. 36 (7). Informa UK Limited: 541–548. doi:10.1080/08820538.2021.1900283. ISSN 0882-0538. PMID 33734926. S2CID 232302383.
  28. ^ Downie, L. E.; Busija, L.; Keller, P. R. (May 22, 2018). "Artificial, blue-light filtering lenses in the eye for protecting the macula (back of the eye) after cataract surgery". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018 (5). Cochrane: CD011977. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011977.pub2. PMC 6494477. PMID 29786830.
  29. ^ Nagai, H.; Hirano, Y.; Yasukawa, T.; Morita, H.; Nozaki, M.; Wolf-Schnurrbusch, U.; Wolf, S.; Ogura, Y. (September 2015). "Prevention of increased abnormal fundus autofluorescence with blue light-filtering intraocular lenses". Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 41 (9). Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery: 1855–9. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.01.017. PMID 26471051. S2CID 10599992.
  30. ^ Bennett, Timothy J. (2017). "Equipment & Technique". Ophthalmic Photographers' Society.
  31. ^ Bennett, Timothy J. (2017). "Fluorescein Fundamentals". Ophthalmic Photographers' Society.
  32. ^ Clark, B. a. J. (November 1969). "Color in Sunglass Lenses". Optometry and Vision Science. 46 (11): 825–839. doi:10.1097/00006324-196911000-00004. ISSN 1538-9235. S2CID 37985129.
  33. ^ Anderson, Kenneth V; Coyle, Frances P; O'Stben, W. Keith (1 May 1972). "Retinal degeneration produced by low-intensity colored light". Experimental Neurology. 35 (2): 233–238. doi:10.1016/0014-4886(72)90149-5. PMID 5030851.
  34. ^ Ham, William T.; Mueller, Harold A.; Sliney, David H. (11 March 1976). "Retinal sensitivity to damage from short wavelength light". Nature. 260 (5547): 153–155. Bibcode:1976Natur.260..153H. doi:10.1038/260153a0. PMID 815821. S2CID 4283242.
  35. ^ Hovis, Jeffery K.; Lovasik, John V.; Cullen, Anthony P.; Kothe, Angela C. (October 1989). "Physical Characteristics and Perceptual Effects of "Blue-Blocking" Lenses". Optometry and Vision Science. 66 (10): 682–689. doi:10.1097/00006324-198910000-00004. ISSN 1538-9235. PMID 2587033. S2CID 11521840.
  36. ^ Yousef, Tareq. "There's no evidence that blue‑light blocking glasses help with sleep". Dalhousie News. Retrieved 28 August 2023.
  37. ^ Shechter, Ari; Quispe, Kristal A; Mizhquiri Barbecho, Jennifer S; Slater, Cody; Falzon, Louise (June 4, 2020). "Interventions to reduce short-wavelength ("blue") light exposure at night and their effects on sleep: A systematic review and meta-analysis". SLEEP Advances. 1 (1): zpaa002. doi:10.1093/sleepadvances/zpaa002. PMC 10127364. PMID 37192881. Retrieved May 25, 2022.
  38. ^ M, Rosenfield; RT, Li; NT, Kirsch (2020). "A double-blind test of blue-blocking filters on symptoms of digital eye strain". Work (Reading, Mass.). 65 (2): 343–348. doi:10.3233/WOR-203086. PMID 32007978. S2CID 211012744.
  39. ^ Woodley, Matthew (May 31, 2017). "Optical chain fined $69,000 for misleading ad". Insight.
  40. ^ Powell, Selina (May 26, 2017). "BOOTS OPTICIANS FINED £40,000 OVER MISLEADING BLUE LIGHT ADVERTISING". Optometry Today.
  41. ^ "How to use Night Shift on your Mac". March 13, 2019.
  42. ^ "Set your display for night time in Windows 10". March 13, 2019.
  43. ^ "Gamer Advantage LLC". www.asa.org.uk. Advertising Standards Authority. Archived from the original on 21 July 2023. Retrieved 21 July 2023.
  44. ^ "Gamer Advantage's Blue-Light Glasses". Truth in Advertising. 2022. Archived from the original on 21 July 2023. Retrieved 21 July 2023.
  45. ^ Beaulé, C.; Robinson, B.; Lamont, E. W.; Amir, S. (2003). "Melanopsin in the circadian timing system". Journal of Molecular Neuroscience. 21 (1): 73–89. doi:10.1385/JMN:21:1:73. PMID 14500998. S2CID 18390790.
  46. ^ Keemss, Kim; Pfaff, Stephanie C.; Born, Matthias; Liebmann, Jörg; Merk, Hans F.; von Felbert, Verena (2016). "Prospective, Randomized Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Local UV-Free Blue Light Treatment of Eczema". Dermatology. 232 (4): 496–502. doi:10.1159/000448000. PMID 27537360. S2CID 20586892.
  47. ^ Weinstabl A, Hoff-Lesch S, Merk HF, von Felbert V (2011). "Prospective randomized study on the efficacy of blue light in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris". Dermatology. 223 (3): 251–9. doi:10.1159/000333364. PMID 22105015. S2CID 207589357.
  48. ^ Pfaff S, Liebmann J, Born M, Merk HF, von Felbert V (2015). "Prospective Randomized Long-Term Study on the Efficacy and Safety of UV-Free Blue Light for Treating Mild Psoriasis Vulgaris". Dermatology. 231 (1): 24–34. doi:10.1159/000430495. PMID 26044167. S2CID 14291418.
  49. ^ Gold MH, Andriessen A, Biron J, Andriessen H (2009). "Clinical Efficacy of Self-applied Blue Light Therapy for Mild-to-Moderate Facial Acne". J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2 (3): 44–50. PMC 2923954. PMID 20729943.
  50. ^ Morton CA, Scholefield RD, Whitehurst C, Birch J (2005). "An open study to determine the efficacy of blue light in the treatment of mild to moderate acne". J Dermatolog Treat. 16 (4): 219–23. doi:10.1080/09546630500283664. PMID 16249142. S2CID 10681363.
  51. ^ Wan MT, Lin JY (2014). "Current evidence and applications of photodynamic therapy in dermatology". Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 7: 145–63. doi:10.2147/CCID.S35334. PMC 4038525. PMID 24899818.
  52. ^ Nestor MS, Swenson N, Macri A, Manway M, Paparone P (2016). "Efficacy and Tolerability of a Combined 445nm and 630nm Over-the-counter Light Therapy Mask with and without Topical Salicylic Acid versus Topical Benzoyl Peroxide for the Treatment of Mild-to-moderate Acne Vulgaris". J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 9 (3): 25–35. PMC 4896818. PMID 27354885.
  53. ^ "Buy the Philips goLITE BLU energy light HF3332/60 energy light". Philips.
  54. ^ "Philips dermatology treatment solutions - Blue LED light therapy | Philips Healthcare". Philips.